why did the government allow this to occur? Why didn't they take possession of ALL the emails and then a netural party decide which were "personal" and which were "official" documents. ----
The *Bush White House email controversy* surfaced in 2007 during the controversy involving the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy>. Congressional requests for administration documents while investigating the dismissals of the U.S. attorneys required the Bush administration to reveal that not all internal White House <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House> emails were available, because they were sent via a non-government domain hosted on an email server not controlled by the federal government. Conducting governmental business in this manner is a possible violation of the Presidential Records Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Records_Act> of 1978, and the Hatch Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939>.[1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-MJ-1> Over 5 million emails may have been lost.[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-CREW-2> [3] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-autogenerated1-3> Greg Palast <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Palast> claims to have come up with 500 of the Karl Rove <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove> emails, leading to damaging allegations.[4] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-4> In 2009, it was announced that as many as 22 million emails may have been lost. [5] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-5> The administration officials had been using a private Internet domain, called gwb43.com, owned by and hosted on an email server run by the Republican National Committee <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_National_Committee>,[6] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-6>for various communications of unknown content or purpose. The domain name is an abbreviation for "George W. Bush <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush>, 43rd" President of the United States <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States>. The server came public when it was discovered that J. Scott Jennings <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Scott_Jennings>, the White House's deputy director of political affairs, was using a gwb43.com email address to discuss the firing of the U.S. attorney for Arkansas.[7] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-wp1-7> Communications by federal employees were also found on georgewbush.com (registered to "Bush-Cheney '04, Inc."[8] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-8>) and rnchq.org (registered to "Republican National Committee"[9] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-9>), but, unlike these two servers, gwb43.com has no Web server <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_server> connected to it — it is used only for email.[10] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-10> The "gwb43.com" domain name was publicized by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_for_Responsibility_and_Ethics_in_Washington> (CREW), who sent a letter to Oversight and Government Reform Committee <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oversight_and_Government_Reform_Committee> committee chairman Henry A. Waxman <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_A._Waxman> requesting an investigation.[11] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-11> Waxman sent a formal warning to the RNC, advising them to retain copies of all emails sent by White House employees. According to Waxman, "in some instances, White House officials were using nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications."[12] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-12> The Republican National Committee claims to have erased the emails, supposedly making them unavailable for Congressional investigators.[13] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-13> On April 12, 2007, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Stanzel> stated that White House staffers were told to use RNC accounts to "err on the side of avoiding violations of the Hatch Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939>, but they should also retain that information so it can be reviewed for the Presidential Records Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Records_Act>," and that "some employees ... have communicated about official business on those political email accounts."[14] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-gaggle4-12-14> Stanzel also said that even though RNC policy since 2004 has been to retain all emails of White House staff with RNC accounts, the staffers had the ability to delete the email themselves. Contents [hide <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#>] - 1Dead Letter Office <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Dead_Letter_Office> - 2Use by senior White House staff <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Use_by_senior_White_House_staff> - 3Investigations with missing emails <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Investigations_with_missing_emails> - 3.1House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#House_Committee_on_Oversight_and_Government_Reform> - 3.2Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy> - 3.3CIA leak grand jury investigation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#CIA_leak_grand_jury_investigation> - 3.4General Services Administration <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#General_Services_Administration> - 3.5Department of Education <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Department_of_Education> - 4Legalities <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Legalities> - 4.1The Hatch Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#The_Hatch_Act> - 4.2Presidential Records Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#Presidential_Records_Act> - 5See also <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#See_also> - 6References <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#References> - 7External links <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#External_links> Dead Letter Office[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=1> ] Some of the "missing" emails that were sent through the RNC accounts were mistakenly addressed to[15] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-15> georgewbush.org, a parody site. Text of the misaddressed emails is available at the Dead Letter Office.[16] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-16> [*verification needed <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability>*] Use by senior White House staff[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=2> ] According to a former White House official, Karl Rove <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove> used RNC-hosted addresses for roughly "95 percent" of his email.[17] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-17> Rove provided email from his [email protected] address in exhibits to the United States House Committee on the Judiciary <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_the_Judiciary> .[18] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-18> White House deputy Jennifer Farley told Jack Abramoff <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Abramoff> not to use the official White House system "because it might actually limit what they can do to help us, especially since there could be lawsuits, etc."[7] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-wp1-7> Abramoff responded, "Dammit. It was sent to Susan on her RNC pager and was not supposed to go into the WH system."[19] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-19> Investigations with missing emails[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=3> ]House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=4> ] The House Oversight committee in an interim staff report, released on June 18, 2007:[20] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-House-Oversight-2007-06-18-20> - At least eighty-eight Republican National Committee email accounts were granted to senior Bush administration officials, not "just a handful" as previously reported by the White House spokesperson Dana Perino in March 2007. Her estimate was later revised to "about fifty." Officials with accounts included: Karl Rove <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove>, the President’s senior advisor; Andrew Card <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Card>, the former White House Chief of Staff; Ken Mehlman <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Mehlman>, the former White House Director of Political Affairs; and many other officials in the Office of Political Affairs, the Office of Communications, and the Office of the Vice President. - The RNC has 140,216 emails sent or received by Karl Rove. Over half of these emails (75,374) were sent to or received from individuals using official ".gov" email accounts. Other users of RNC email accounts include former Director of Political Affairs Sara Taylor <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Taylor> (66,018 emails) and Deputy Director of Political Affairs Scott Jennings (35,198 emails). These email accounts were used by White House officials for official purposes, such as communicating with federal agencies about federal appointments and policies. - Of the 88 White House officials who received RNC email accounts, the RNC has preserved no emails for 51 officials. - There is evidence that the Office of White House Counsel under Alberto Gonzales <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales> may have known that White House officials were using RNC email accounts for official business, but took no action to preserve these presidential records. - The evidence obtained by the Committee indicates that White House officials used their RNC email accounts in a manner that circumvented these requirements. At this point in the investigation, it is not possible to determine precisely how many presidential records may have been destroyed by the RNC. Given the heavy reliance by White House officials on RNC email accounts, the high rank of the White House officials involved, and the large quantity of missing emails, the potential violation of the Presidential Records Act may be extensive. Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=5> ] *Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy>* ( - v <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy> - t <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy> - e <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy&action=edit> ) Articles - Timeline <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy_timeline> - Summary of attorneys <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissed_U.S._attorneys_summary> - Documents <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy_documents> - Congressional hearings <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy_hearings> - List of dismissed attorneys <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Dismissed_attorneys_table> - Complete list of related articles <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Dismissal_of_United_States_Attorneys_controversy> G. W. Bush administration officials involved - Fred F. Fielding <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_F._Fielding>, White House Counsel <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Counsel> - William K. Kelley <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_K._Kelley>, Deputy White House Counsel - William Moschella <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Moschella>, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General - Brett Tolman <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Tolman>, U.S. Attorney <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney>, District of Utah <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Utah>, former counsel to Senate Judiciary Committee - Mary Beth Buchanan <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Beth_Buchanan>, U.S. Attorney <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney>, Western District of Pennsylvania <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Pennsylvania>, former Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys from 2004 to 2005 Involved administration officials who resigned - Alberto Gonzales <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales>, United States Attorney General <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney_General>, former White House Counsel <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Counsel> - Kyle Sampson <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Sampson>, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General - Michael A. Battle <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_A._Battle>, Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys - Michael Elston <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Elston>, Chief of Staff to the Deputy Attorney General - Monica Goodling <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Goodling>, Justice Department's liaison to the White House - William W. Mercer <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Mercer>, U.S. Attorney, Acting Associate Attorney General (retains position as U.S. Attorney in Montana) - Sara Taylor <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sara_Taylor>, Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Political Affairs - Paul McNulty <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_McNulty>, Deputy Attorney General - Harriet Miers <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Miers>, former White House Counsel (resigned prior to publicity surrounding the controversy, effective January 31, 2007) - Karl Rove <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove>, White House Deputy Chief of Staff <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Deputy_Chief_of_Staff> - Bradley Schlozman <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradley_Schlozman>, Director Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Office_for_United_States_Attorneys#Executive_Office_for_United_States_Attorneys>; former Acting Assistant Attorney General for, and later Principal Deputy Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice_Civil_Rights_Division>; former interim U.S. Attorney <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney> for the Western District of Missouri <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Western_District_of_Missouri> U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Committee_on_the_Judiciary> *110th Congress* - Patrick Leahy <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Leahy>, Chair (D) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)> - Arlen Specter <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlen_Specter>, Ranking member, former Chair (R) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)> - Chuck Schumer <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Schumer>, Chair: Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_Judiciary_Subcommittee_on_Administrative_Oversight_and_the_Courts> (D) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)> U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_the_Judiciary> *110th Congress* - John Conyers <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Conyers>, Chair (D) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)> - Lamar Smith <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamar_S._Smith>, Ranking member (R) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)> - Linda Sánchez <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_S%C3%A1nchez>, Chair: Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Judiciary_Subcommittee_on_Commercial_and_Administrative_Law> (D) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)> Main article: Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy> During the investigation into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys,[21] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-21> it became known White House <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House> staff was using Republican National Committee <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_National_Committee> (RNC) email accounts.[22] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-22> The White House stated it might have lost five million emails.[2] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-CREW-2> On May 2, 2007, the Senate Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena to Attorney General <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General> Alberto Gonzales <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales> and the Department of Justice <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Justice> (DOJ) compelling the production of email Karl Rove sent to DOJ staff, regarding evaluation and dismissal of attorneys, no matter what email account Rove used, whether White House or National Republican party accounts, or other accounts, with a deadline of May 15, 2007 for compliance. The subpoena also demanded relevant email previously produced in the Valerie Plame <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame> controversy and investigation for the CIA leak scandal (2003) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_leak_scandal_(2003)>.[23] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-23> CIA leak grand jury investigation[edit <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bush_White_House_email_controversy&action=edit§ion=6> ] Main articles: CIA leak scandal <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_leak_scandal>, CIA leak grand jury investigation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_leak_grand_jury_investigation> and Niger uranium forgeries <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries> Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_C._Wilson> alleged that his wife's identity was covert and that members of the George W. Bush administration knowingly revealed that information as retribution for his New York Times op-ed entitled "What I Didn't Find in Africa," of July 6, 2003, regarding the claim that Saddam Hussein was seeking uranium. However, as Plame had been serving in a desk job at Langley for more than five years, she was not considered “covert” under the meaning of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act.[24] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-24> Patrick J. Fitzgerald, while investigating the leak, found that emails were missing from the White House server.[25] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-25> [26] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-MotherJones-26> Mother Jones <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Jones_(magazine)> wrote that this is possibly the reason the RNC changed the policy of deleting emails after 30 days to saving all email sent and received by White House officials.[26] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-MotherJones-26> In light of the apparent vanished emails Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_for_Responsibility_and_Ethics_in_Washington> (CREW) has asked to reopen the investigation.[27] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-CREW2-27> [28] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy#cite_note-28> On Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 9:19:18 AM UTC-6, Bill wrote: > > > > > > > .......she destroyed thousands of emails she said were "personal" and > turned over to the Government those that SHE decided were "official" > government documents. This was the fox in the hen house....why did the > government allow this to occur? Why didn't they take possession of ALL the > emails and then a netural party decide which were "personal" and which were > "official" documents. She was given the opportunity to destroy any evidence > that might be used in Court against her and Obama let it happen rather then > slapping a suponea on her ass soon as it became known what she was doing. > Others had gone to jail in the past for not protecting records but she > walks.....and now is the top contender in her party for President of these > United States of America.....unbelievable > > > We see reports on TV all the time with officials carrying out the > computers of people under investigation and with 100 FBI agents looking at > her she is under investigation but still allowed access to her > computers......for her to decide what to turn over and what to > destroy.....and you ask why Trump is so popular with this kind of stuff > going on in DC......... > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] <javascript:> > Reply-to: [email protected] <javascript:> > To: [email protected] <javascript:> > Sent: 2/24/2016 7:25:37 A.M. Pacific Standard Time > Subj: Fwd: [grendelreport] Slick Hilly and Willie > > > > > > > > > > > > *Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton* > > *The Clintons should both be in prison. She is not fit to run for POTUS.* > > > > Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the > > 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely > > had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a > > conflict of interest. > > . > > The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest > > Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as > > a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually > > prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. > > This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and > > repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. > > Here's how it works: > > . > > 1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clinton's > > set it up in Canada. > > . > > 2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian > > charity. In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. > > I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and > > expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one > > morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian > > charity). > > . > > 3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes > > a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation. > > . > > 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity > > claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors. > > . > > 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for > > legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is > > on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, > > pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, > > etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I > > are subsidizing it. > > . > > 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, > > somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They > > discover these "clerical errors" and > > begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns. > > 7. Net result -- foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free > > and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook > > definition of money laundering. > > . > > Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one > > Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the > > formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired > > massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization > > controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department > > approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was > > granted. > > . > > As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. > > That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in > > gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin > > company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk. > > . > > Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly > > structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask > > yourself this: > > . > > Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian > > charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better > > yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and > > countries in need? > > . > > This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. > > . > > Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she > > was willing to take. > > . > > Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and > > they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in > > January 2017. > > . > > Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You > > must inform and educate them. > > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZW40ZGVyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTYzMjQ2MDk-> > > > > [image: > https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcjE4dWZoBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjMyNDYwOQ--] > > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcjE4dWZoBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjMyNDYwOQ--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
