I agree Perp!  The mainstream media is guilty as Hell, for continuing the
false narratives, (especially the case in Minnesota!) when these liberal
wack jobs know, or should know,  (There's no excuse, anyone with common
sense should be able to see the blatant false narrative!)  that the stories
portraying the cops involved in these incidents is blatantly false!  When
you stop and think about it, neither of these stories,  the one from
Minnesota nor the incident in Baton Rouge Louisiana should have even
received the national media attention that they did....The stories only got
attention because of the false narrative storyline that the cause was a
poor innocent Black man who was shot by aggressive White cops!  (My blood
boils!)

With regard to Sheriff David Clarke,  I thought the segment was hilarious
when I saw it this morning!  Sheriff  Clarke appears on set with Don Lemon
who cuts off the feed and sends the show to commercial because he doesn’t
like Clarke's  pushback.  When they come back from commercial, Clarke
doesn’t let up.  Notice how Don Lemon demands a civil conversation then
doesn’t let Clarke finish a sentence!   Typical far left mainstream media,
when the agenda doesn't go the way that they are scripting it!



On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:56 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I watched that earlier and think the good Sheriff wasn't quite at the top
> of his game. That's understandable, though, in light of all the cops being
> killed lately.
>
> But he missed the opportunity to pin the false rhetoric that is leading to
> these cop killings on not just Obama and other democrats, but ALSO the
> leftloons in the media who have played a HUGE role in it.
>
> I think the sooner the media is forced to own the fact that they have
> blood on their hands with the rising body count of cops being murdered, the
> better. I'm glad to see some finally stating openly that Obama has blood on
> their hands, but really think the media has played an equal role.
>
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 12:14:08 PM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> The same perspective from CNN's homosexual Democratic Sympathizer Don
>> Lemon, who met his "Waterloo" with Wisconsin Sheriff David Clarke:
>>
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/18/us/wisconsin-sheriff-david-clarke-i-predicted-this/index.html
>>
>> (Good For a Laugh!)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:53 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/12/cnn_panel_devolves_into_shouting_when_blacklivesmatter_supporter_rejects_statistics_on_race_and_crime.html
>>>
>>> It's people like Marc Lamont Hill who can't be bothered with facts that
>>> are the problem. But it's good to hear someone finally state forcefully
>>> what many of us have been saying for years - that blacks interact more with
>>> cops than whites b/c they commit FAR more violent crimes (and as a result
>>> are disproportionately arrested for those crimes).
>>>
>>> How is this not common sense? And how does this "Distinguished
>>> Professor of African American Studies at Morehouse College in Atlanta,
>>> Georgia" expect to be taken seriously (by thinking people) when he insists
>>> that when 75% of murders are committed by 23% of the population that "those
>>> numbers aren't true because there are other dimensions"?
>>>
>>> What's even more fascinating is that he says - practically in the same
>>> breath - that finding 3 racist emails from a police force of 100 people is
>>> indicative of systemic racism. And he later argues with Houck that
>>> "systemic" doesn't mean "throughout the police department". Someone needs
>>> to send this "Distinguished Professor" a freaking dictionary:
>>>
>>> sys·tem·ic
>>> səˈstemik/
>>> *adjective*
>>> adjective: *systemic*
>>> *1*.
>>> of or relating to a system, especially as opposed to a particular part.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think I've ever seen a panel get that loud on CNN.
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to