http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-30/barack-obama-will-be-only-president-history-never-have-year-3-gdp-growth
Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of
3% GDP Growth

*Submitted by Michael Snyder via The Economic Collapse blog,*
<http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/barack-obama-is-on-track-to-be-the-only-president-in-history-to-never-have-a-year-of-3-gdp-growth>

*We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. * It was being
projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent
<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-29/u-s-economy-grew-a-less-than-forecast-1-2-in-second-quarter>
during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2
percent.  In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the
first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8
percent.  What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging
on by its fingernails from falling into a recession.   As Zero Hedge
<http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-29/gdp-shocker-us-economy-grew-only-12-second-quarter-q1-revised-08>
has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current
business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least
1949″.  *This
is not what a recovery looks like.*

In addition,* Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only
president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the
economy grew by at least 3 percent.*  Every other president in American
history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew
by at least 3 percent.  But this has not happened under Obama even though
he has had two terms in the White House.

[image: Description:
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/07/25/20160730_obama_0.jpg]
<http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/07/25/20160730_obama.jpg>

The following are the yearly GDP growth numbers under Obama.  They come
directly from the official website of the World Bank
<http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=US>…

*2009: -2.8 percent*

*2010: 2.5 percent*

*2011: 1.6 percent*

*2012: 2.2 percent*

*2013: 1.5 percent*

*2014: 2.4 percent*

*2015: 2.4 percent*

*Does that look like a “recovery” to you?*

Of course not.

And many are anticipating that this latest extremely disappointing GDP
number will discourage the Federal Reserve from raising interest rates any
time in the near future
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2016/07/29/economy-grows-weakly-third-straight-quarter/87684508/>
…

The disappointing report could keep the Federal Reserve on hold longer as
it considers another interest rate hike. The Fed lifted its key rate in
December for the first time in nine years but has held it steady since.

*According to the pundits in the mainstream media, this was supposed to be
the year when the U.S. economy finally returned to “normal”, but that has
not happened at all. * In fact, in recent days we have gotten a spate of
bad news about the economy.  We just learned that the homeownership rate in
the United States has hit the lowest level ever
<http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/bye-bye-middle-class-the-rate-of-homeownership-in-the-united-states-has-hit-the-lowest-level-ever>,
and Gallup’s U.S. economic confidence index has fallen to the lowest level
so far this year
<http://wolfstreet.com/2016/07/19/americans-economic-gloom-risis-stocks-hit-high-asset-bubbles-not-helpful/>
.

With the election coming up rapidly, this is the kind of news that Hillary
Clinton
<http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/is-it-just-a-coincidence-that-vicious-lightning-storms-hit-philly-on-the-day-of-hillary-clintons-acceptance-speech>
definitely does not need.  She needs to be able to sell the American people
on the idea that the Obama years have been very good for the U.S. economy.
If things take a sharp turn down in the coming months, that may be enough
to cost her the election.

So far, Hillary Clinton’s economic agenda has not received that much
scrutiny, but the truth is that she hopes to increase taxes in a whole
bunch of ways which would be very harmful for the economy.  The following
comes from an excellent piece by John Kartch and Alexander Hendrie
<http://www.atr.org/full-list-hillary-s-planned-tax-hikes>…

Hillary has endorsed several tax increases on middle income Americans,
despite her pledge <http://www.atr.org/hillary-s-phony-250000-tax-pledge>
not to raise taxes on any American making less than $250,000. She has said
she would be fine with a payroll tax hike
<http://www.atr.org/hillary-admits-she-would-not-veto-middle-class-tax-hike>
on all Americans, she has endorsed a steep soda tax
<http://www.atr.org/bernie-slams-hillary-s-soda-tax-proposal-clearly-violates-her-pledge>,
endorsed a 25% national gun tax
<http://www.atr.org/newly-released-footage-shows-hillary-s-25-gun-tax-endorsement>,
and most recently, her campaign manager John Podesta said
<http://www.atr.org/hillary-open-carbon-tax-says-campaign-chief> she would
be open to a carbon tax. It’s no wonder that when asked by ABC’s George
Stephanopoulos if her pledge was a “rock-solid” promise, she slipped and
said the pledge was merely a “goal.”
<http://www.atr.org/hillary-s-phony-250000-tax-pledge> In other words,
she’s going to raise taxes on middle income Americans.

Hillary’s formally proposed $1 trillion net tax increase consists of the
following:

*Income Tax Increase – $350 Billion:* Clinton has* proposed
<https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/08/10/college-compact/>*
a
$350 billion income tax hike in the form of a 28 percent cap on itemized
deductions.

*Business Tax Increase — $275 Billion: *Clinton has called for a tax hike
of at least $275 billion through undefined business tax reform, as
described in a Clinton *campaign
<https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/infrastructure/> *document.

*“Fairness” Tax Increase —* *$400 Billion: *According to her *published
plan
<https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2016/01/12/investing-in-america-by-restoring-basic-fairness-to-our-tax-code/>,*
Clinton has called for a tax increase of “between $400 and $500 billion” by
“restoring basic fairness to our tax code.” These proposals include a “fair
share surcharge,” the taxing of carried interest capital gains as ordinary
income, and a hike in the Death Tax.

Taxes tend to be a pet peeve of mine, so looking at that list of proposed
taxes definitely makes me cringe.

*If Donald Trump wants to hit the Democrats really hard on the economy, all
he has to do is point out the fact that Barack Obama is going to be the
only president in American history to never see 3 percent economic growth
for an entire year, and he had two entire terms in which to try to turn
things in a positive direction.*

Sadly, things are very likely going to be worse for the economy no matter
who wins the election.  Under Obama, our national debt
<http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/19-4-trillion-dollars-in-debt-we-have-added-1-1-trillion-dollars-a-year-to-the-national-debt-under-obama>,
our trade deficit, and most of our other long-term economic problems have
gotten much, much worse, and so the table is set for a major economic
disaster during the next presidential administration.

And if what I have to share about the future of America in my new book
<http://amzn.to/2aaOiMF> is correct, we are definitely moving into a
“perfect storm” that will not just be economic in nature.  The things that
are coming are going to shake this nation to the very core, and I believe
that we will soon face the consequences for decades of exceedingly foolish
decisions.

*So in the end, we may look back and long for the days of 1.2 percent
economic growth, because what is on the horizon is going to make that look
like a Sunday picnic.*


------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMGp0bTg4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0Njk5MTgwODM->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlN2dsMXFwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2OTkxODA4Mw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to