<http://www.americanthinker.com/>

July 28, 2016
Creeping Sharia in Health Care

*By Carol Brown <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/carol_brown/>
  
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/creeping_sharia_in_health_care_.html
<http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/creeping_sharia_in_health_care_.html>*

Islamic supremacy is arriving in medical settings using stealth means, or
what is often referred to as creeping sharia. Common themes include Muslim
health care workers refusing to uphold infection control protocols, Muslim
medical students refusing to study topics they deem forbidden according to
Islamic law, Muslim visitors in hospitals ignoring hygiene guidelines to
protect patients, and hospitals bending over backwards (or is it forwards?)
to accommodate Muslim demands above and beyond anything done for members of
any other religious or demographic group. Also covered are outright acts of
violence perpetrated by Muslim men who attack hospital personnel.

Islamic supremacy + dhimmitude = the end of civilized societies. Before I
begin the (by no means exhaustive) list of how this equation is playing out
in health care settings throughout the West, I’d like to share a personal
story.

Shortly after the 9/11 Islamic terror attacks I had occasion to speak with
a Muslim doctor who lived down the street from me. At that point in time I
was completely ignorant about Islam and was, in fact, still a leftist
(though wouldn’t be for much longer).

The doctor, a meticulously groomed, soft-spoken, modern-appearing man made
it clear that, among other things, he believed that Muslim females become
“mature” when they turned nine and therefore can be married at that age. I
ignored the alarm bell that went off in my head when he made that
statement. Of course I’ve long since realized that this highly educated
doctor who worked at a prestigious hospital had sanctioned, at the very
least, child rape (in keeping with the teachings of his prophet, the king
of all pedophiles, Mohammed).

And therein lies the rub with Muslim doctors, as with all Muslims. If they
are good Muslims and follow the teachings of the Quran, their values will
necessarily be in direct conflict with our own.

So with that in mind, let me begin our tour through Islamic supremacy in
medical settings right here in the United States.

An Islamic medical association <https://imana.org/> operating in this
country was identified
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/20.pdf> by the Muslim
Brotherhood as one among several “organizations of our friends” -- friends
that could help the MB advance their goal of destroying America from
within. Part of the association’s oath
<http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7419> includes:
“We serve no other God besides [Allah] and regard idolatry as an abominable
injustice.”

Islamic supremacy also asserts itself through lawfare
<http://www.primerus.com/business-law-articles/accommodating-islam-in-the-workplace-a-work-in-progress-332011.htm>
as
when a Muslim medical student who was dismissed
<http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=31687> due to poor
academic performance sued the medical school on grounds of discrimination.
Another case involved a Muslim health care worker who was fired because she
refused
<http://www.fox25boston.com/news/woman-sues-childrens-hospital-after-being-fired-for-refusing-flu-shot/141573987>
to
get a flu vaccine (required in hospital settings to protect patients)
claiming the vaccine violated
<http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2016/04/muslim_who_refused_shot_cannot_sue_to_get_job_back>her
Islamic faith because it contained a pork by product and that the entire
affair violated her civil rights.

In addition to lawfare there are many other ways Muslims push for special
accommodations
<https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/global-and-cultural-effectiveness/Pages/Accommodating-Muslim-Employees-During-Ramadan.aspx>
such
as Muslim doctors
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/health/01patients.html?pagewanted=print&_r=1>
and
advocacy organizations <http://www.ispu.org/default.aspx> calling
<http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2010/10/31/jme.2010.037614.abstract> on
health care personnel to be more knowledgeable
<http://www.ispu.org/pdfs/620_ISPU_Report_Aasim%20Padela_final.pdf> about
Muslim traditions so they can better meet the needs of their Muslim
patients.

And so hospitals across the country are implementing
<http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130727/MAGAZINE/307279970> an
array of services for Muslim patients,  including halal meals, alternatives
to medications that contain alcohol and/or pork derivatives, gowns for
women designed to protect their modesty, early morning and late night
appointments during the month of Ramadan, hiring more Muslim chaplains,
handing out Qurans to the parents of Muslim children after they’re born,
providing prayer rugs, hosting Iftar events
<http://www.massgeneral.org/about/newsarticle.aspx?id=2341>, and setting up
prayers rooms exclusively
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/25/AR2006082501123.html>
for
Muslims who often find existing multi-faith prayers rooms offensive and/or
inconvenient.

One town in Illinois proposed
<http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130727/MAGAZINE/307279970> a
“Muslim-centric” medical facility replete with many of the features noted
above as well as Arabic-speaking staff, private rooms to ensure a Muslim
standard of modesty, and space for ritual foot baths. The state rejected
the plan but it was resubmitted without any references to sharia law.

There has also been a proliferation of medical outreach programs for the
Muslim community along with “sensitivity training” for medical staff who
are expected to become so well versed in the array of Muslim patients’
needs that they can discern differences between the needs of a Muslim from
Pakistan compared to a Muslim from Saudi Arabia.

The Muslim-as-victim meme rears its head as well, such as the idea
<http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130727/MAGAZINE/307279970> that
Muslims “don’t have access” to healthcare, as was recently asserted by the
vice president of cultural competence at a medical center in Brooklyn, NY.

And when Muslims do access health care, special demands may be made as when
a Muslima
<http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/07/muslim_woman_sues_somerset_hos.html>
in
New Jersey went to an emergency room complaining of chest pain and insisted
on a female (corrected) technician after she was told she’d need an
electrocardiogram. No male technician was available and she was informed of
her options. She decided to sit and wait. After several hours her husband
requested she be transferred to a different hospital. The couple then sued,
claiming the Patient’s Bill of Rights entitled the Muslima to her demands.

The issue of Muslima patients demanding same-sex health care professionals
in emergency situations is one I expect to escalate, as is happening in
Europe. But first, let’s take a quick detour to Canada where medical
professionals banned
<http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/10/13/canadian-doctors-barred-from-performing-virginity-tests.html?intcmp=latestnews>virginity
tests and the issuance of “chastity certificates” (popular in the Muslim
culture) after the discovery of four dead Afghan women who were victims of
“honor killings.” Elsewhere in Canada on a maternity
<http://www.thewhig.com/2010/07/31/expensive-upgrade> ward where shared
rooms arranged four beds with privacy curtains in between, a Muslim couple
received greater levels of privacy than were afforded to others when their
demands ejected at least one non-Muslim couple out of the ward and into a
much more costly private room that the couple had to pay for.

In Europe the situation is even more dire. And pervasive.

In the UK, an 87-year-old Alzheimer’s patient was forced to wait
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/9162051/Woman-died-after-Muslim-nurse-refused-to-help-as-he-was-praying.html>
for
care after she fell because the Muslim charge nurse withheld assistance
until he finished his prayers. This delay in care lasted five to ten
minutes. The patient died shortly thereafter.

Meanwhile, in at least one British hospital, staff
<http://www.religionnewsblog.com/20044/islamification-10> were turning the
beds of Muslim patients up to five times a day so patients could face Mecca
while they pray. Then staff turned them back when the patients were
finished. Staff were also expected to provide Muslim patients with running
water so they can wash their feet before prayer.

And then there is the issue of traditional Muslim attire, much of which
doesn’t meet standards
<http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2009/07/den-bosch-muslim-nurse-fired-for.html>
for
infection control. The National Health Service requires staff providing
direct care to patients to be in short sleeves to reduce the risk of
transmitting increasingly deadly pathogens from one patient to another.
Since many Muslim women consider it immodest to expose their forearms, some
have refused to do so for proper hand-washing or scrubbing in prior to
surgery. So the NHS developed
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7528335/Female-Muslim-doctors-allowed-to-wear-disposable-sleeves-for-modesty-official-guidance.html>
disposable
sleeves for Muslim health care workers who have direct patient contact.

Naturally the tale above would not be complete without the
Muslim-claiming-discrimination story as when a British radiographer
<http://www.nursingtimes.net/muslim-woman-quits-nhs-over-bare-arms-policy/1823410.fullarticle>
who
was faced with having to choose
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/2662473/Muslim-radiographer-loses-job-after-refusing-to-bare-her-arms.html>
between
losing her job or complying with the dress code, chose Islam over her job,
then complained about having to make the choice. Meanwhile, the Islamic
Medical Association in the UK upheld
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1577426/Female-Muslim-medics-disobey-hygiene-rules.html>
the
Islamic tenet that Muslim women out in public must be covered, stating: “No
practicing Muslim woman -- doctor, medical student, nurse, or patient --
should be forced to bare her arms below the elbow.”

But it doesn’t stop there. (It never stops when it comes to Islamic
supremacism.) Some Muslimas working in hospitals in the UK also want
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4634351.stm> sterile hijabs to wear in
the operating room and a private place to scrub in so their modesty can be
protected. Some Muslim health care workers also refuse
<http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(06)68431-6/fulltext>
to
use alcohol-based hand sanitizer because they claim it is forbidden
according to Islamic law.

And what of British Muslims studying to work in health care? Well, some
<http://www.religionnewsblog.com/19582/islamic-extremism-9> have refused to
attend classes or learn about anything that conflicts with the teachings of
the Quran, such as material
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2066795/Muslim-students-walking-lectures-Darwinism-clashes-Koran.html>
on
evolution and health issues related sexual promiscuity and/or alcohol
consumption. The commitment to avoid all things alcohol-related also
impacts patient safety when Muslim visitors to hospitals refuse
<http://www.religionnewsblog.com/16960/muslims-refuse-anti-mrsa-gel> to use
anti-bacterial gel before entering patient wards, ignoring signs posted
throughout British hospitals asking visitors to use the gel in order to
reduce the spread of infection. (Of note, there is nothing in Islamic law
that would suggest Muslims cannot use alcohol-based sanitary gels and it
appears that some Muslims are using this as a point of leverage to assert
supremacy. See here
<http://www.islam-watch.org/Mac/Islam_Superstition_Health_issues.htm>, here
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643194/If-Muslim-doctors-are-intolerant-let-them-go.html>,
and here
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1202192/Muslims-refuse-use-alcohol-based-hand-gels-religious-beliefs.html>
.)

The final exhibit of the UK tour is a Muslim dentist who insisted
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-482112/Muslim-dentist-told-patient-wear-headscarf-elsewhere.html>
his
female patients wear hijabs, keeping a stash of head scarves in his office
to give them. He abandoned at least two patients in acute pain who refused
to don the hijab and on at least one occasion
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178411/Muslim-dentist-refused-treat-female-patients-unless-wore-Islamic-dress.html>
provided
lesser quality care to a patient’s son when the mother agreed to wear the
hijab but apparently didn’t answer a question about her son’s prayer habits
in a way that pleased the dentist. Of note, the dentist’s younger brother
is an Islamic extremist who stated that the 9/11 terror attack served “the
pleasure of Allah.”

Throughout Europe it has also become increasingly common for Muslim men
<http://www.islamist-watch.org/143/delivering-obstetrics-from-radical-islam>to
physically attack
<https://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/01/french-muslim-attacks-male-gynecologist-for-examining-his-wife-after-complicated-birth>
male
doctors. In some cases, women are denied
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/feb/06/france.jonhenley> urgently
needed medical care because their spouses are adamant
<http://www.expatica.com/fr/news/Muslims-fined-for-refusing-male-doctor-at-childbirth_153167.html>
that
they be attended to by a female, or not be attended to at all.

In France, a newborn’s father
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2077529/French-Muslim-jailed-punching-nurse-tried-remove-wifes-burqa-childbirth.html#ixzz1hSVrJ1Er>
called
the midwife a “rapist” then broke into the locked delivery room after
seeing a nurse remove his wife’s burqa so she could give birth, hit the
nurse in the face, and demanded she put the burqa back on his wife. In
another case a Muslim male physically attacked
<http://islamineurope.blogspot.it/2008/08/lyons-gynecologist-attacked-by-husband.html>
a
gynecologist who stepped in to assist with his wife’s complicated delivery.
A few months prior to that, another doctor was attacked by a knife-wielding
Islamist.

In Belgium, when a Muslim woman needed an emergency c-section, her husband
blocked <http://www.religionnewsblog.com/19778/islamic-extremism-13> the
door to the operating room because the anesthesiologist was a male. After
being told no female anesthesiologists were available a two-hour stand-off
ensued after which time an imam was called upon who allowed the doctor to
administer an epidural through a tiny opening in the woman’s burqa. A
female nurse performed the surgery while the anesthesiologist
<http://www.meforum.org/1823/delivering-obstetrics-from-radical-islam>remained
outside the room shouting instructions to another nurse who was monitoring
the anesthesia. An organization of anesthesiologists stated there have been
other such incidents involving Muslim patients and their families.

In Sweden, it’s more of the same. When a male doctor answered
<http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2010/11/sweden-doctor-assaulted-for-being-man.html>
an
urgent call to assist with a mother who was bleeding heavily after giving
birth, the woman’s husband screamed at him to leave the room immediately.
When the doctor refused, the husband and the brother-in-law
<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/06/islamists-in-the-hospital-ward>
physically
attacked him.

In addition to Muslim males becoming enraged if a male health care provider
attends to their wife, there other things that may set them off. (Like just
about everything.) And so a Turkish Muslim went on a violent
<https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/05/germany-sick-turk-attacks-hospital-nurse-because-too-many-crosses-on-wall>
rampage
in a Catholic hospital in Germany because there were too many crosses on
the walls.

Barbarism meets the West. (And I haven’t even touched upon the abject
madness that has unfolded in hospitals across Europe as invaders invade en
masse, here
<http://pamelageller.com/2015/10/video-czech-doctor-describes-migrant-hospital-invasion.html/>
, here
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/260412/muslim-migrants-attack-german-nurses-wknives-daniel-greenfield>,
and here <http://www.aina.org/news/2012082490853.htm>.)

As the Muslim population in a society increases
<http://pamelageller.com/atlas_shrugsmuslim-immigration/>, expressions of
Islamic supremacy become more and more aggressive. How it manifests in
health care settings is just one of many ways in which the West is slowly
and steadily being taken down by those who embrace an ideology that
mandates nothing less than world domination.


Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/07/creeping_sharia_in_health_care_.html#ixzz4FvbtbVAP

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>
| AmericanThinker
on Facebook
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>


------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdTRnMzQwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0Njk5MTgxNTk->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJldXQxYzlzBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ2OTkxODE1OQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to