Yep.

I wonder if all of the Clinton campaign workers who also work at CNN will 
start spontanously combusting over Hillary's 22-point deficit with men 
compared to Trump's 15-point deficit with women?

I sure hope so, as it would be fun to watch - should any of them bother to 
notice it.

On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 8:48:49 PM UTC-4, gtheist957 wrote:
>
> They also pointed out that the lead has changed hand numerous times but 
> hillary has been in the lead more times than Trump, you know     to put 
> things in perspective.
>
> On Sep 6, 2016 2:56 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" <
> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> That's entirely possible. But I would think if they were preparing for an 
>> anti-Trumb bomb, they'd have continued sampling 6-8% more democrats and 
>> left his numbers lower than they are, then made that their false target to 
>> show outright defeat (and no reason for his supporters to even bother 
>> voting).
>>
>> Maybe they know an anti-Hillary bomb is about to drop and they're trying 
>> to dampen the clear connection to a drop in the polls? I certainly hope so, 
>> anyway. But you're right that it's suspicious.
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 10:52:07 AM UTC-4, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm trying to figure out the logic of this poll....I don't believe that 
>>> CNN or any of the mainstream media would allow for this, unless there's an 
>>> overall, concerted effort and reasoning as to "Why" there's now a change to 
>>> show Trump as leading.
>>>
>>> Could be that they're getting ready to drop another bomb on Trump?  
>>> Something's up.....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:45 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It appears that CNN mysteriously stopped falsely constructing their 
>>>> polls by oversampling of democrats vs. republicans.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the 20% lead among independents suggests to me that many former 
>>>> republicans now claiming to be independents are finally pulling their 
>>>> heads 
>>>> out of their asses and admitting Trump really is a safer vote than 
>>>> Hillary. 
>>>> Or it could also mean that even those extreme morons who claim they are 
>>>> republicans who will vote for Hillary to "save the GOP" might have managed 
>>>> to pull their heads out as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 10:32:48 AM UTC-4, Perplexed wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/06/_politics-zone-injection/trump-vs-clinton-presidential-polls-election-2016/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet this just KILLED them to admit! And that they finally go into 
>>>>> particulars and show that Hillary's gap with men is far worse than 
>>>>> Trump's 
>>>>> with women is astonishing - especially that they show that it's only 
>>>>> unmarried women that are giving Hillary an overall advantage with women.
>>>>>
>>>>> Immigration - statistical tie (does that mean that half of the country 
>>>>> is racist? According to Clinton voters it does).
>>>>>
>>>>> Economy - Trump wins by 56-41%
>>>>>
>>>>> Terrorism - Trump wins by 51-45%
>>>>>
>>>>> Honesty/trustworthy - Trump by 50-35%
>>>>>
>>>>> Independents give Trump a 20% lead over Clinton. I guess that means 
>>>>> they are all partisan hack radical rightwingers too, right Hillary 
>>>>> asshats?
>>>>>
>>>>> Voter enthusiasm - Trump wins by 56-46%
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> -- 
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>  
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to