What if we all run up a tab and declare bankruptsy? The USA would collapse.
On Nov 7, 5:02�pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ramakazee, > > What happens to each when the company stock falls? > Your burning your own time lad. > > On Nov 7, 9:48�am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You insipid weed, do you own any stock other than a couple shares of > > Walmart? > > > Are you employed? �Do you have a 401k with your employer? �Maybe a 529 > > for your inbred kids? �What happens to each when your company's stock > > rises? > > > Quit burning my time Gilligan. > > > On Nov 6, 10:52�pm, PhreedomPhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Always good to hear from the kiddies in the Pre-K. �Initial issues of > > > stock helps the company, trading stocks is nothing but speculation. > > > The "wealth" created is ephemeral and can blow away with the first > > > breeze of downturn. �Those making financial gain through speculating > > > in stocks are parasites. �After market stocks are gambles not > > > investments. > > > > Your coffee cup is probably the only one dumb enough to listen to you, > > > Gomer. > > > > I can't believe there are two people this dumb and ignorant in this > > > group. �Gaar, is Kamakazee your screenname, too? > > > > On Nov 6, 1:54 pm, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > "You have said in the past that you make your living as a Day > > > > Trader in the stock markets. That means that by speculating you are > > > > able to draw wealth from the system without actually producing > > > > anything." > > > > > Nice attempt at kindergarden econ. > > > > > Increasing the worth/value of a company, through purchasing it stock, > > > > not only helps the company in the financial markets, it also benefits > > > > those employees whose 401ks are tied to the stock price. And that's > > > > just for starters.... > > > > > I've dumbed this down to the point of my coffee cup nodding in > > > > agreement, hope that you can grasp it Gilligan. > > > > > On Nov 6, 10:41 am,PhreedomPhan<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gaar, you should know by now that I fully oppose both the Welfare and > > > > > the Warfare State. I think both are created for the deficit spending > > > > > that enriches those who finance the debt. Still, it never ceases to > > > > > amaze me how you, a self professed parasite, can talk of living off > > > > > the sweat of others. > > > > > > You don't remember professing to be a parasite? Let me refresh your > > > > > memory. You have said in the past that you make your living as a Day > > > > > Trader in the stock markets. That means that by speculating you are > > > > > able to draw wealth from the system without actually producing > > > > > anything. You draw a profit which you can then compete for goods and > > > > > services with those who actually work for a living and put value into > > > > > the system. You are living off the sweat of others. > > > > > > We have in our bodies various bacteria and other organisms that > > > > > contribute in some way to our well being while drawing nourishment > > > > > from us, but any creature that draws nourishment from the host body > > > > > without returning anything useful to that body is a parasite. You > > > > > Gaar, by definition, are a parasite. > > > > > > Rick > > > > > 18th Century Liberal > > > > > 21st Century > > > > > Reactionaryhttp://PhreedomPhan-lostliberty.blogspot.comhttp://phreedomphan-ameri... > > > > > > On Nov 6, 10:16 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Just making the point that he CHOSE to respond. > > > > > > > Usually, those who have no interest don't waste the time. > > > > > > > Guess you Loony Liberals have plenty of time to waste, since you are > > > > > > going to be Living off the sweat of others... > > > > > > > No surprise there. > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 11:44 pm, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > he is just trying to piss in your pocket hollywood . because the > > > > > > > people rejected his hero ! > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 10:51 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > Just didn't find the subject all that interesting. So sue me. > > > > > > > > > Obama won, deal with it. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 5, 12:02 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 8:24 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Dosen't much matter what I think about it. > > > > > > > > > > The better question with you holly is do you think? > > > > > > > > > > You have shown here, time and again, to be only interested in > > > > > > > > > what you > > > > > > > > > have and have not said, and not really interested in > > > > > > > > > discussing things > > > > > > > > > any further than your smantical rantings... > > > > > > > > > > Imagine that. > > > > > > > > > > I could list a few very simple questions about Obama and what > > > > > > > > > he has > > > > > > > > > said he would do, but why bother? > > > > > > > > > > You have never shown an ability to discuss such things in any > > > > > > > > > manner > > > > > > > > > other than to insult or say what you didn't say... > > > > > > > > > > Which is as productive as the Obama Presidency will be.- Hide > > > > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
