I disagree Brine.

To date, most insurance companies have left the market because they cannot
make a profit and/or compete.

Just as important, "ObamaCare" prohibits what I termed, "Catastrophic
Health Insurance";  where folks had a plan that covered them in some type
of health care crisis;  now, EVERYONE must pay for pap smears,  abortions;
contraception; (at 60, why do I need contraception?); and mental health
services.

Total bull crap....



On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Brian Bednarek <[email protected]> wrote:

> The biggest problem with "keeping your plan" was that the insurance
> companies got rid of many existing plans and people were forced to either
> find a plan from another company or a different plan within the same
> network ... the system is still too slanted to the insurance and pharma
> companies!!!
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Uhm????
>>
>> Where are you getting your numbers from Lobo?  Back in 2014 at the one
>> year anniversary from when the ACA was rolled out and implemented, only 56%
>> were able to keep their original health care plans, (which includes
>> Doctors) and less than 6% were happy with the plan.  This was before the
>> significant price increases that happened last year and are predicted to
>> double this year if something isn't done.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Lobo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Good to see you too, Kam.
>>>
>>> <<Before I burn 10 mins of my time, do you actually believe that 98% of
>>> those folks enrolled in the ACA were able to keep their doctor?>>
>>>
>>> 98% of people who have insurance policies have kept their doctors,
>>> whether they got them through employment or on exchanges.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 9:29:16 PM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Los Lobos, good to see you.
>>>>
>>>> That being said; "*If You Like Your Doctor, You Can Keep Your
>>>> Doctor">>*
>>>>
>>>> True enough for 98% of insurance policyholders after the passage of the
>>>> ACA."
>>>>
>>>> Before I burn 10 mins of my time, do you actually believe that 98% of
>>>> those folks enrolled in the ACA were able to keep their doctor?
>>>>
>>>> I'll give you a hint, no where near 98%, but lemme know if you're game.
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:41:51 PM UTC-6, Lobo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> BTW:
>>>>>
>>>>> <<"*If You Like Your Doctor, You Can Keep Your Doctor">>*
>>>>>
>>>>> True enough for 98% of insurance policyholders after the passage of
>>>>> the ACA. Unlike the huge percentage of Americans who lost their doctors of
>>>>> choice after the switch to HMOs under Republicans in the 1970s. Not to
>>>>> mention the tens of millions of Americans who will lose ANY doctors PERIOD
>>>>> after Trump/GOPers "repeal & replace" the ACA with JustGoAwayAndDieCare.
>>>>>
>>>>> << "*Thousands of Shovel Ready Jobs!">>*
>>>>>
>>>>> They were ready soon enough. The Stimulus created/saved 3.2 million
>>>>> jobs and turned around the slide into another Great Depression (we were
>>>>> losing 800,000 jobs a month!) into the longest sustained period of job
>>>>> growth in history.
>>>>>
>>>>> <<"*My Administration will be the most transparent Administration bar
>>>>> none!">>*
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't it feel a little silly to bring that up coming on the heels of
>>>>> a president who won't even release his tax returns, despite having 
>>>>> billions
>>>>> of dollars of assets and debts here and abroad?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:50:19 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Lobo!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Not Even Close.....No Cigar My Friend!)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, this comes from the Obama Administration's web site:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/11/20/infogra
>>>>>> phic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are the same folks who sold the American People: "*If You Like
>>>>>> Your Doctor, You Can Keep Your Doctor"*; and among other "Greatest
>>>>>> Hits" like:  "*Thousands of Shovel Ready Jobs!"*;  and, "*My
>>>>>> Administration will be the most transparent Administration bar none!"   *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meanwhile, we've had numerous examples of the Obama Administration's
>>>>>> literal failure of vetting anyone, much less folks from Iran, Iraq,
>>>>>> Somalia, Syria, Yemen, and whatever the other two Nations are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Lobo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two to three years being intensively investigated by nine different
>>>>>>> US agencies is "no vetting process whatsoever"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/11/20/infogra
>>>>>>> phic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states
>>>>>>> Infographic: The Screening Process for Refugee Entry into the United
>>>>>>> States
>>>>>>> NOVEMBER 20, 2015 AT 7:09 PM ET BY AMY POPE
>>>>>>> TWITTER
>>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=%2Fblog%2F2015%2F11%2F20%2Finfographic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states&text=Infographic%3A%20The%20Screening%20Process%20for%20Refugee%20Entry%20into%20the%20...>
>>>>>>>  FACEBOOK
>>>>>>> <http://facebook.com/sharer.php?u=%2Fblog%2F2015%2F11%2F20%2Finfographic-screening-process-refugee-entry-united-states>
>>>>>>>  EMAIL
>>>>>>> Summary:
>>>>>>> A step-by-step guide to the rigorous process for refugee entry into
>>>>>>> the U.S.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ‎Refugees undergo more rigorous screening than anyone else we allow
>>>>>>> into the United States. Here's what the screening process looks like for
>>>>>>> them:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [image: The Screening Process for Refugees Entry Into the United
>>>>>>> States (full text of the graphic written below the image)]
>>>>>>> The Full Text of the Graphic:
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> The Screening Process for Refugee Entry Into the United States
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recurrent vetting: Throughout this process, pending applications
>>>>>>> continue to be checked against terrorist databases, to ensure new, 
>>>>>>> relevant
>>>>>>> terrorism information has not come to light. If a match is found, that 
>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>> is paused for further review. Applicants who continue to have no flags
>>>>>>> continue the process. If there is doubt about whether an applicant 
>>>>>>> poses a
>>>>>>> security risk, they will not be admitted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. *Many refugee applicants identify themselves to the U.N.
>>>>>>>    Refugee Agency, UNHCR. UNHCR, then:*
>>>>>>>       - *​​*Collects identifying documents
>>>>>>>       - Performs initial assessment
>>>>>>>          - Collects biodata: name, address, birthday, place of
>>>>>>>          birth, etc.
>>>>>>>          - Collects biometrics: iris scans (for Syrians, and other
>>>>>>>          refugee populations in the Middle East)
>>>>>>>       - Interviews applicants to confirm refugee status and the
>>>>>>>       need for resettlement
>>>>>>>          - Initial information checked again
>>>>>>>       - Only applicants who are strong candidates for resettlement
>>>>>>>       move forward (less than 1% of global refugee population).
>>>>>>>    2. *Applicants are received by a federally-funded
>>>>>>>    Resettlement Support Center (RSC):​​*
>>>>>>>       - Collects identifying documents
>>>>>>>       - Creates an applicant file
>>>>>>>       - Compiles information to conduct biographic security checks
>>>>>>>    3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Biographic security checks start with enhanced interagency
>>>>>>>    security checks*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Refugees are subject to the highest level of security checks of
>>>>>>>    any category of traveler to the United States.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       *​​*U.S. security agencies screen the candidate, including:
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          National Counterterrorism Center/Intelligence Community
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          FBI
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Department of Homeland Security
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          State Department
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       The screening looks for indicators, like:
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Information that the individual is a security risk
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Connections to known bad actors
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Outstanding warrants/immigration or criminal violations
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       *DHS conducts an enhanced review of Syrian cases, which may
>>>>>>>       be referred to USCIS Fraud Detection and National Security 
>>>>>>> Directorate for
>>>>>>>       review. Research that is used by the interviewing officer informs 
>>>>>>> lines of
>>>>>>>       question related to the applicant’s eligibility and credibility.*
>>>>>>>       4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/USCIS interview:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Interviews are conducted by USCIS Officers specially trained
>>>>>>>       for interviews*​​*
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Fingerprints are collected and submitted (biometric check)
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Re-interviews can be conducted if fingerprint results or new
>>>>>>>       information raises questions. If new biographic information is 
>>>>>>> identified
>>>>>>>       by USCIS at an interview, additional security checks on the 
>>>>>>> information are
>>>>>>>       conducted. USCIS may place a case on hold to do additional 
>>>>>>> research or
>>>>>>>       investigation. Otherwise, the process continues.
>>>>>>>       5.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Biometric security checks:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Applicant’s fingerprints are taken by U.S. government
>>>>>>>       employees
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Fingerprints are screened against the FBI’s biometric
>>>>>>>          database.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Fingerprints are screened against the DHS biometric
>>>>>>>          database, containing watch-list information and previous 
>>>>>>> immigration
>>>>>>>          encounters in the U.S. and overseas.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Fingerprints are screened against the U.S. Department of
>>>>>>>          Defense biometric database, which includes fingerprint records 
>>>>>>> captured in
>>>>>>>          Iraq and other locations.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       If not already halted, this is the end point for cases with
>>>>>>>       security concerns. Otherwise, the process continues.
>>>>>>>       6.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Medical check:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       The need for medical screening is determined​​
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       This is the end point for cases denied due to medical
>>>>>>>       reasons. Refugees may be provided medical treatment for 
>>>>>>> communicable
>>>>>>>       diseases such as tuberculosis.
>>>>>>>       7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Cultural orientation and assignment to domestic resettlement
>>>>>>>    locations:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ​​Applicants complete cultural orientation classes.
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       An assessment is made by a U.S.-based non-governmental
>>>>>>>       organization to determine the best resettlement location for the
>>>>>>>       candidate(s). Considerations include:
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Family; candidates with family in a certain area may be
>>>>>>>          placed in that area.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Health; a candidate with asthma may be matched to certain
>>>>>>>          regions.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       A location is chosen.
>>>>>>>       8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *Travel:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ​​International Organization for Migration books travel
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Prior to entry in the United States, applicants are subject
>>>>>>>       to:
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Screening from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s
>>>>>>>          National Targeting Center-Passenger
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          The Transportation Security Administration’s Secure Flight
>>>>>>>          Program
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       This is the end point for some applicants. Applicants who
>>>>>>>       have no flags continue the process.
>>>>>>>       9.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    *U.S. Arrival:*
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       *​​*All refugees are required to apply for a green card
>>>>>>>       within a year of their arrival to the United States, which 
>>>>>>> triggers:
>>>>>>>       -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Another set of security procedures with the U.S.
>>>>>>>          government.
>>>>>>>          -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       *Refugees are woven into the rich fabric of American society!*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *‎Amy Pope is Deputy Assistant to the President for Homeland
>>>>>>> Security*
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Correction: A previous version of the graphic and blog post stated
>>>>>>> in step 2 that the name of the RSC was the Refugee Support Center. This 
>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>> been corrected to the proper name, the Resettlement Support Center.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 6:19:40 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since we seem to, "Speak In Meme" on occasion here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Keith In Tampa <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good Evening Mags!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm curious if you really subscribe to what's contained in your
>>>>>>>>> meme, or if you're just, "Passing It Along"; as the 
>>>>>>>>> "OccupyDemocrats/George
>>>>>>>>> Soros/DailyKos/DemocraticUnderground" are encouraging the Secular
>>>>>>>>> Progressive camp to express and propound?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 5:32 PM, ImStillMags Mags <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-i7vEKt-p5qs/WJEQV5eqmFI/AAAAAAAAQpE/fjkf_UQ6rzEoMAhX1MJfc5rwgkfDBR6OQCLcB/s1600/16196037_1168354486619262_9066036556020302696_n-1.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 5:51:26 AM UTC-8, OhioMark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> they want to let hundreds of thousands of potential terrorists
>>>>>>>>>>> to just waltz right into our country, no questions asked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group
>>>>>>>>>> /PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "PoliticalForum" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> brine
> http://brineb.blogspot.com/
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to