is it just weddings that general betray us hates or dark skined
people ?

On Nov 8, 4:26 am, "\"Lone Wolf\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another US massacre in Afghanistan
> By James Cogan
> 8 November 2008
>
> An Afghan government investigation into US air strikes carried out on
> Monday in the province of Kandahar has found that at least 37
> civilians taking part in a wedding celebration were massacred. Another
> 30 people or more—men, women and children—were injured. The
> investigation also claimed that 26 insurgents fighting for the former
> Islamist Taliban regime were killed.
>
> The US attacks devastated the small village of Wocha Bakhta in the
> district of Shah Wali Kot, some 80 kilometres north of Kandahar city.
>
> According to a US military statement issued on Wednesday, the air
> strike was called in against a band of Taliban who had occupied the
> village and fired on a patrol of NATO troops. It alleged that the
> insurgents used the civilian population as human shields and implied
> that any casualties could have been caused by insurgent fire.
>
> US spokesman Colonel Greg Julian told journalists: "We acknowledge
> that some civilians have been injured and some may have been killed. I
> can't confirm numbers."
>
> An Agence France Presse report based on interviews with villagers and
> filed on Wednesday presented a very different picture of events.
> Locals told AFP that as a lunch-time wedding celebration was drawing
> to a close, insurgents fired on occupation troops from a nearby hill.
> NATO forces wrongly concluded that the village was the source of the
> attack and initiated a full-scale assault.
>
> Abdul Jalil, a cousin of the woman getting married, told AFP: "They
> surrounded the village. From 2 p.m. until 12 at night they kept the
> village under fire from helicopters, jet fighters and troops on the
> ground."
>
> The village cleric, Mullah Mohammad Asim, claimed that air strikes had
> targeted six to seven houses, including the complex where the wedding
> party was taking place. "They pounded and fired into the village from
> afternoon until midnight," he said.
>
> The family of the bride, who was wounded in the attack, was decimated.
> Her father, Roozbeen Khan, said: "I lost two sons, two grandsons, a
> nephew, my mother and a cousin... My wounded son was in my arms, right
> here, bleeding. He died last night." While the groom was not injured,
> his father, mother and sister were reportedly killed.
>
> Mullah Mohammad Asim described what took place when US ground forces
> finally entered the village: "At midnight the Americans came and they
> took the men out of the houses and handcuffed them. But when they saw
> the death and the destruction, they removed the handcuffs and told us
> to take the wounded to hospital."
>
> The slaughter of civilians in Afghanistan has become an almost daily
> occurrence. Without sufficient troops to control the country and
> desperate to avoid casualties of their own, US and NATO forces rely
> heavily on air power to combat the growing Taliban insurgency. Air
> strikes or helicopter gunship attacks are called in against any
> suspected insurgent concentration. In scores of cases, the alleged
> "Taliban" have turned out to be villagers attempting to go about their
> lives amid a foreign occupation and a resistance war. Wedding parties—
> which often involve celebratory gun fire into the air—have frequently
> been wrongly assessed as "insurgent activity".
>
> Statistics released by the US military show a huge increase in
> airstrikes. In all, 13,802 air missions have been flown in Afghanistan
> and 2,983 bombs were dropped in the first nine months of this year.
> This breaks down to at least 50 missions and 10 bombings per day—a 31
> percent increase over the 10,538 missions flown during the same time
> period in 2007.
>
> The US-backed Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai is becoming
> increasingly frantic over the indiscriminate air strikes. The constant
> reports of civilian deaths have generated enormous hatred of both the
> American occupation and the puppet regime. They are a factor in the
> growing support for the Taliban resistance—especially in the country's
> ethnic Pashtun southern provinces where the population has suffered
> the most from US and NATO atrocities.
>
> At a press conference on Wednesday to congratulate Barack Obama on his
> election victory, Karzai issued an appeal to the president-elect. "My
> first demand from the US president, when he takes office, would be to
> end civilian casualties in Afghanistan and take the war to places
> where there are terrorist nests and training centres," he said.
>
> Any notion that an Obama administration will direct the US military to
> scale back its operations in Afghanistan is absurd. On the contrary,
> Obama has centred his foreign policy on an escalation of the Afghan
> war and an increase in US and NATO troop numbers in the country.
> During the election, he repeatedly advocated extending the conflict
> over the border into Pakistan's tribal agencies, which Taliban
> insurgents have used as a safe haven and base for their resistance to
> the US-led occupation.
>
> Under the fraudulent banner of finishing the "war on terrorism", Obama
> intends to ensure that Afghanistan is consolidated as a US client
> state. His election campaign served as the vehicle for influential
> sections of the American establishment that consider a high priority
> should be given to Central Asia—a region where Russia and China are
> striving for geopolitical dominance.
>
> The Bush administration is now in essence implementing the Obama
> strategy. Since September, the US military has carried out repeated
> air strikes inside Pakistan. Additional US combat brigades are being
> prepared for deployment to Afghanistan. As many as 30,000 extra troops
> may be sent over the next three to six months. The bipartisan
> militarist policy is one of the reasons why Bush can speak of a
> "seamless transition" to an Obama White House.
>
> The figure overseeing the escalation of the Afghan war on behalf of
> both Bush and Obama is US general David Petraeus, the former commander
> of US forces in Iraq. Petraeus now heads US Central Command, which has
> authority over operations throughout the Middle East and Central Asia.
>
> Petraeus visited Pakistan at the beginning of this week for talks with
> President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani. Both
> appealed to him to end the US attacks inside the country which are
> fueling support for Islamist militants. He responded by authorising
> another air strike yesterday against a housing complex in the tribal
> agency of North Waziristan, which killed between 10 and 13 people
> according to Pakistani sources.
>
> Petraeus is now in Afghanistan, where he is compiling a "strategic
> review" of US operations that will be presented in the coming weeks to
> the Bush administration and president-elect Obama. Petraeus arrived in
> the country as the US military brushed off the Karzai government's
> complaints over the impact of air strikes. Within hours of Karzai's
> press conference on Wednesday, a bombing run against an alleged
> Taliban band in the Afghan province of Badghis reportedly killed seven
> civilians as well as 13 militants.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to