This is public schools in america. Over here you have a turd and over here
you have a turd wrapped in colorful ornate wrapping with bows and ribbons.

On Feb 3, 2017 10:35 AM, "Pittalum" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm going to suggest that the *accommodations and planning* needing made
> will change the very nature of the schools that made them desirable in the
> first place.
>
> OK, for the sake of speculation, let's say the planning and accommodations
> have been made. How is that going to make it all better; in what ways?
>
>
> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 11:27:46 AM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote:
>>
>>
>> "pretty much overwhelming those school districts' ability to accommodate
>> them"
>>
>> That's comparable to a company deciding not to advertise during the Super
>> Bowl because the prospective business that the ad would create might be
>> overwhelming...
>>
>> Structurally there would need to be planning, kids would need to enroll a
>> year or so early, accommodations would need to be made.
>>
>> Nothing impossible, this isn't Chinese algebra.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 8:44:28 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think you fellows have really thought this thing through - or if
>>> you have, you aren't telling us the whole story.
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't, for example, every parent in the city of Pittsburgh want
>>> their kids to go to Mt. Lebanon or Upper St. Clair High School - pretty
>>> much overwhelming those school districts' ability to accommodate them. Who
>>> will pick and choose what kids get in and which ones don't? And what do you
>>> do with those that don't?
>>>
>>> Right now, there are charter schools popping up all over the place - so
>>> that's already happening.
>>>
>>> Can someone give a little more detail on how you expect this thing to
>>> work - or what it is that you expect to change from current conditions?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 6:27:34 PM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 95% would welcome them, as long as they are involved in the school and
>>>> its activities.  And the voucher-parents would see stereotypical myths
>>>> dissolve in front of their eyes.
>>>>
>>>> PS.  I went to a private school from 8th-12th.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 4:06:30 PM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How do you think the parents of kids currently in those private
>>>>> schools would feel about a bunch of voucher clutching underprivilegeds
>>>>> banging on the doors to get in...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 2:40:21 PM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would end real fast by empowering parents to put their kids in
>>>>>> private schools with a voucher system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 11:27:46 AM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote:
>>
>>
>> "pretty much overwhelming those school districts' ability to accommodate
>> them"
>>
>> That's comparable to a company deciding not to advertise during the Super
>> Bowl because the prospective business that the ad would create might be
>> overwhelming...
>>
>> Structurally there would need to be planning, kids would need to enroll a
>> year or so early, accommodations would need to be made.
>>
>> Nothing impossible, this isn't Chinese algebra.
>>
>>
>> On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 8:44:28 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think you fellows have really thought this thing through - or if
>>> you have, you aren't telling us the whole story.
>>>
>>> Why wouldn't, for example, every parent in the city of Pittsburgh want
>>> their kids to go to Mt. Lebanon or Upper St. Clair High School - pretty
>>> much overwhelming those school districts' ability to accommodate them. Who
>>> will pick and choose what kids get in and which ones don't? And what do you
>>> do with those that don't?
>>>
>>> Right now, there are charter schools popping up all over the place - so
>>> that's already happening.
>>>
>>> Can someone give a little more detail on how you expect this thing to
>>> work - or what it is that you expect to change from current conditions?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 6:27:34 PM UTC-5, Kamakazee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 95% would welcome them, as long as they are involved in the school and
>>>> its activities.  And the voucher-parents would see stereotypical myths
>>>> dissolve in front of their eyes.
>>>>
>>>> PS.  I went to a private school from 8th-12th.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 4:06:30 PM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How do you think the parents of kids currently in those private
>>>>> schools would feel about a bunch of voucher clutching underprivilegeds
>>>>> banging on the doors to get in...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 2:40:21 PM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would end real fast by empowering parents to put their kids in
>>>>>> private schools with a voucher system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to