View this email in your browser
<http://us12.campaign-archive2.com/?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=915199356c&e=8f9bc48c43>

<http://meforum.us12.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=3391b29529&e=8f9bc48c43>


Trump Upsets the Academic Foreign Policy Establishment

*by Andrew Harrod*

*Jihad WatchFebruary 17, 2017*

*https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/trump-upsets-the-academic-foreign-policy-establishment
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=4ebf0481a0&e=8f9bc48c43>*



Nathan Brown

"Previous administrations, Republican and Democrat, very sharply resisted"
the Middle East foreign policy outlook of America's new president, Donald
Trump. So argued George Washington University Middle East studies
professor Nathan
Brown
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=40de3720e7&e=8f9bc48c43>
during the February 7 presentation
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=4bcff7c14d&e=8f9bc48c43>
"Trump's Foreign Policy Positions on Palestine and the Middle East" at
Washington, DC's anti-Israel Jerusalem Fund. The hackneyed views of the
panelists and, presumably, the largely leftist audience of about fifty,
including two women in Code Pink
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=382a6dd5df&e=8f9bc48c43>
attire and "pussy hats
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=e958723c71&e=8f9bc48c43>,"
strengthened the case for Trump's anti-establishment approach.

Brown skeptically referenced Trump's "conviction that the United States is
in a civilizational battle." Trump considers the "necessity to eliminate
radical Islamic terrorism" a "very, very core theme," thereby raising a
"suspicion on some people's parts that 'radical Islamic terrorism' is
really a synonym for Islam." As an example, Brown cited Trump's references
to global Muslim support for executing apostates
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=31605c9b99&e=8f9bc48c43>,
a factual observation of Islam's political pathologies.

Brown condemned the "extremely pugnacious tone" of Trump and his
administration, particularly forthcoming ambassador to Israel David Friedman
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=f09c5fe741&e=8f9bc48c43>,
to whom he attributed "very, very strong, even deeply offensive statements
about people who disagree with him." He fretted—seemingly without
irony—that "it is difficult to think analytically when you have so many
verbal fireworks and, sort of, bombs being set off." Brown ignored whether
an unorthodox approach might improve upon the recurring failures of the
Middle East foreign policy establishment.

The never-ending Arab-Israeli conflict exemplifies this uncritical
acceptance of the status quo. Brown noted the past decade's "ineffectual
flailing in the context of a peace process that was created in the 1980s
and 1990s." He maintained that the Oslo Accords peace process had
"viability in that time," but "died in the mid-2000s, around the time of
the Palestinian elections of 2006," which ultimately brought Hamas to power
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=ad1c3ed0b3&e=8f9bc48c43>
in the Gaza Strip. The conflict in recent years has "metastasized" into a
"generational struggle between two societies," he maintained, disregarding
the Islamic supremacism underling Palestinian rejection of Israel
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=bc2f0e9a35&e=8f9bc48c43>.
At least now, Brown rightfully recognizes that the conflict is "not one in
which some sort of concerted diplomatic push" will succeed.

Although wrong to demand that both sides undertake reforms in equal
measure, Brown grasped the truth that there should be a

focus on developments within these societies, ways in which a younger
generation of Palestinian political activists are just fundamentally
different and check out some of the questions and the structures that are
answerable to the past. One in which the Israeli political spectrum is
shifted in some important ways. . . . It makes sense to take a much longer
perspective and not worry about what the administration said last week.

University of Maryland professor and longtime Middle East pollster Shibley
Telhami
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=368e6f7abc&e=8f9bc48c43>,
meanwhile, clung to tired, failed Middle East foreign policy concepts,
including the traditional two-state solution. He was distraught at the
thought of Trump initiating a "shift in paradigm" whereby policymakers
could entertain ideas such as "it's not an occupation in the West Bank; we
shouldn't support a Palestinian state; support annexation of blocs of
settlements." Reiterating the myth that Israeli settlements are key to
peace, he wondered "how much damage will take place" under Trump and
whether the U.S. will "be permissive of massive change on the ground" in
the disputed territories from the 1967 war.

Shibley Telhami

Telhami condemned Israeli "occupation" of the ancestral Jewish heartland in
Judea and Samaria and rejected out of hand any connection between Islam and
violence. "When someone says it is not occupation, who is going to
spearhead the fight that it is occupation? When you say Islam is terrorism,
who is going to spearhead the fight" against this claim, he asked.

Telhami drew hope from polling data
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=f5e92aacfe&e=8f9bc48c43>
suggesting that the Palestinians' supposed "demand for justice actually is
resonating more to America than in the past." Similarly, he lauded the
disgraceful
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=ad4ce1cc03&e=8f9bc48c43>
United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334
<http://meforum.us12.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b7aa7eddb0f2bb74bfa4f6cb5&id=1bbfe2bd42&e=8f9bc48c43>,
which falsely called Israeli building in the West Bank and even East
Jerusalem illegal, for restating "that every single inch of the territories
were to be considered occupied territory." For Telhami, it demonstrated an
"international public opinion that is still very strongly on the side of
fairness," a "fairness" that apparently includes labeling Judaism's holiest
site, the Wailing Wall, "occupied."

The panelists may have legitimate concerns about the Trump Administration's
impetuosity, but possibilities for change are preferable to the dead end
policies they proffered. The dangers of Islamic supremacism deserve fresh
scrutiny after years of policymakers' politically-correct willful
blindness. Likewise, rather than rote sloganeering about "land for peace,"
Israel deserves the chance to apply the pressures necessary to defeat an
enemy that has consistently opposed its existence. Trump will receive
plenty of advice, but he would do well to avoid such Middle East studies
establishment figures such as Brown and Telhami.

*Andrew E. Harrod is a freelance researcher and writer who holds a Ph.D.
from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and a J.D. from George
Washington University Law School. He is a fellow with the Lawfare Project.
Follow him on Twitter at @AEHarrod. *








------------------------------
[image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>



__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMWkza25yBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0ODgzMTU5NzE->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbTVkbTZlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ4ODMxNTk3MQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to