http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/07/gregg-jarrett-pres
ident-trumps-military-strike-against-syria-is-perfectly-legal.html
Gregg Jarrett: President Trump's military strike against Syria is perfectly
legal

Gregg Jarrett
<http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/personalities/gregg-jarrett/bio>Published
April 07, 2017

Senator Rand Paul may be a fine doctor, but his knowledge of the law and
Constitution appears misguided.

He proved it when he accused President Trump of acting unconstitutionally
<http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/07/sen-rand-pa> by launching a
military strike against a Syrian airbase without congressional approval.

Senator Paul is mistaken.

*The Constitution*

It is true that under Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitutional, only
Congress has the power to declare war. But a singular strike against a
limited asset hardly constitutes war. It is a military action intended to
confront hostilities which does not rise to the level of a declared war as
the Founders envisioned.

It is clear that the Framers recognized there would be times when the
President needs to use immediate military force unilaterally and without
the extensive time it might take for Congress to consider the matter, then
debate it and approve it.  They chose to withhold from him only the power
to *declare* war, not *make* war which was regarded as a vital emergency
power allowed the president to counter or thwart foreign threats.

Hence it is perfectly consistent with the Constitution for President Trump
to have taken action against the brutality of Bashar Al-Assad to prevent
the spread and repeated use of chemical weapons.  It is not only Syrian
civilians the Commander-In-Chief is endeavoring to protect, but U.S. troops
in the region and other American assets, all of whom stand in jeopardy.

*Congressional Acts*

In 1973, Congress passed The War Powers Act in reaction to the Vietnam War,
which was never a declared war even though roughly 60,000 American soldiers
were killed.

In relevant part, the law permits the president to launch a military strike
on his own, as long as he notifies or consults with Congress within 48
hours. This President Trump did.

An argument can also be made that the president has latitude to take action
against Syria under a 2001 law passed by Congress following the 9/11
attacks. Called The Authorization for Use of Military Force, it gives him
permission to direct military force to prevent future *terror* *attacks*
against the U.S.

Presidents Bush, Obama and Trump have used an expansive view of this
authority to fight both Al Qaeda and ISIS in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and
elsewhere.

The law is not limited to terror groups. It encompasses any nation which
engages directly or indirectly in terrorist acts or harbors terrorists.

The Syrian chemical attack against innocent people can surely be described
as an act of terrorism. And again, the U.S. has vulnerable troops in the
region helping in the fight against ISIS. They might be the next target of
an Assad chemical attack should he not be deterred by the use of American
force.

*President Obama’s Actions*

President Trump’s immediate predecessor, as most presidents before him,
used military force in a foreign venue without congressional authorization.
The same basic reasons and justifications were cited.

He launched attacks against Libya even though Congress refused to grant
permission, arguing he had the constitutional and statutory power to do it
anyway.

Two years later, when Assad launched a deadly chemical attack on his own
people, President Obama once again asserted he had clear authority to act
unilaterally. But he didn’t.

He subsequently backed down electing to abdicate his responsibility to
Congress which he knew would decline to act. It is hard to reconcile the
reasoning behind his decisions.

*More Precedence*

Across the history of this nation, presidents have used military force
without express congressional approval on more than 125 occasions.  None of
these actions were held to be unconstitutional. Hence, there is ample
*precedence* for President Trump’s decision to strike a military base in
Syria.

Some of these presidential actions proved unwise, like President Woodrow
Wilson’s military invasion of Veracruz, Mexico, a bloody conflict which
lasted for months and, arguably, achieved little except embarrassment.

But presidents are allowed to make mistakes of judgment, as long as they
abide by the constitutional framework set forth by the Founders and the
statutory requirements imposed by Congress.

President Trump has done so.

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
<#m_3172143436042969469_m_7549346126093908001_m_-8049994305510903373_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmaXMydW4xBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0OTE2NTMyNjU->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYTFkZGNwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ5MTY1MzI2NQ-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to