Eeeegads *2. The Democratic Party views itself as having authority to favor a candidate without any legal repercussions.*
Without any pretense the Democratic primary nominating process should be expected to be conducted fairly, lawyers for the Democratic Party tell Judge Zloch the lawsuit should be thrown out because the Party has the freedom to determine its nominees by “internal rule”, not voter interests, and thus the party “could have favored a candidate”. On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 2:29:08 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote: > Now this should be good for some laughs! > > A Class Action Complaint has been filed against the DNC by a number of > Bernsie WhuzHisName Supporters claiming that the DNC Primary was conducted > unfairly. In response, counsel for the DNC has argued, among other > arguments, that the DNC is not required to conduct a fair, "Impartial" > election; and that the Court, nor the Judicial Branch of government has the > dominion to make a determination as to whether an Democratic Primary > Election is fair. > > Amazingly, I've heard absolutely no news coverage of this Class Action > Complaint! > > > *7 Jaw-Dropping Revelations From Hearings on the Motion to Dismiss the DNC > Fraud Lawsuit* > > https://medium.com/@zachhaller/7-jaw-dropping-revelations-from-hearings-on-the-motion-to-dismiss-the-dnc-fraud-lawsuit-bee1723b713f > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
