Define "well regulated" as it applies to a militia.

Professor Levy's quote applies to "a well-educated electorate," not a "well 
regulated militia."  Apples and oranges. 

Why are you attempting to make the discussion personal?

On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:11:41 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote:
>
>
> You mean the nominative absolute?
> You *do* grasp simple English grammar?
>
> Regard$,
> --MJ
>
> "A well-educated electorate being necessary for self-governance in a free 
> state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be 
> infringed." Is there anyone who would suggest that means only registered 
> voters have a right to read?" -- Robert Levy, Georgetown University 
> professor
>
>
>
>
> At 10:01 AM 7/20/2017, you wrote:
>
> Another author who decouples the Second Amendment, ignoring the first half 
> pertaining to "A well regulated militia . . . "
>
> On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 8:16:36 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> *We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground’ In Every State, Abolish The 
> BATFE, And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws 
> <http://endoftheamericandream.com> *
>
> ------------------------------
> We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground’ In Every State, Abolish The BATFE, 
> And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws 
>
> Posted: 18 Jul 2017 07:50 PM PDT
>
> [image: []] 
> <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/we-need-to-pass-stand-your-ground-in-every-state-abolish-the-batfe-and-repeal-the-major-federal-gun-laws/gun-girls-silhouette-public-domain#main>Throughout
>  
> history, dictators and tyrants have always wanted to take guns away from 
> the people. Hitler confiscated guns once he took power in Germany, Stalin 
> confiscated guns in Soviet Russia, and Mao confiscated guns when the 
> communists took power in China. An armed population is one of the 
> cornerstones of a free society, and our founders understood this very well. 
> Unfortunately, most Americans don’t seem to understand the Second 
> Amendment in our day and time. The following is what the Second Amendment 
> actually says…¦
>
> A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, 
> the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
>
> The phrase “shall not be infringed†was intended to leave no room for 
> confusion.
>
> Unfortunately, all sorts of restrictions have been put on our absolute 
> right to keep and bear arms over time, and we need to fight to fully 
> restore our rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
>
> A lot of politicians say that they are “pro-gun†, but most of them 
> will only go so far. To me, being “pro-gun†means that you should be 
> fighting to fully restore our Second Amendment rights. In particular, the 
> following are three areas where many “pro-gun†politicians are often 
> quite weak…
>
> #1 We Need Stand Your Ground Laws In All 50 States
>
> If you are not familiar with “stand your ground†laws, the following is 
> how Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law> 
> defines them…
>
> A stand-your-ground law (sometimes called “line in the sand†or “no duty 
> to retreat <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_retreat>†law) is a 
> justification 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_%28jurisprudence%29> in a 
> criminal case, whereby defendants can “stand their ground†and use force 
> without retreating, in order to protect and defend themselves or others 
> against threats or perceived threats. An example is where there is no duty 
> to retreat from any place where they have a lawful right to be, and that 
> they may use any level of force if they reasonably believe the threat rises 
> to the level of being an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily 
> harm or death. One case <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawkins_v._State> 
> describes “the ‘stand your ground’ law… a person has a right to 
> expect absolute safety in a place they have a right to be, and may use 
> deadly force to repel an unlawful intruder.†[1] 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law#cite_note-DS-1>
>
> Today, 28 states have adopted “stand your ground†laws formally, and a 
> few others have adopted “stand your ground†in practice. But even where 
> such laws have been passed formally, they are often way too weak.
>
> We need very strong “stand your ground†laws in all 50 states, and we 
> need to keep fighting for this until we get it done.
>
> #2 We Need To Abolish The BATFE
>
> The BATFE has been used as a political weapon for decades, and there have 
> been many instances where the authority that it has been given has been 
> greatly abused. The following example comes from Breitbart 
> <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/03/report-atf-bypassing-restrictions-compile-information-u-s-gun-owners/>
> …
>
> A recently released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report shows 
> that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) 
> violated restrictions to compile information on U.S. gun owners.
>
> According to the report, the ATF “has 25 firearms-related data systems, 
> 16 of which contain retail firearms purchaser information from a federal 
> firearms licensee (FFL)—such as firearms importers and retaillers.†
> Sixteen of these systems contain “retail firearms purchaser 
> information,†as it pertains to guns purchased from a federal firearms 
> license holder (FFL).
>
> Many have suggested reforming the BATFE, but I believe that the best 
> approach would be to abolish it altogether. If we fully restored Second 
> Amendment rights in this country there would be very little for this agency 
> to do anyway, and any essential functions could easily be taken over by 
> other federal law enforcement institutions.
>
> #3 We Need To Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws
>
> We have lived with some of these laws for so long that most people just 
> assume that they are constitutional. There are so many federal laws that 
> need to be repealed, but I think that a good place to start would be with 
> these four major ones 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States>… National 
> Firearms Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act> 
> (“NFA†) (1934): Taxes the manufacture and transfer of, and mandates the 
> registration of Title II weapons 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_II_weapons> such as machine guns 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_gun>, short-barreled rifles 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-barreled_rifle> and shotguns, heavy 
> weapons, explosive ordnance, silencers 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressor>, and disguised or improvised 
> firearms 
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FImprovised_firearms&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNE4GrcE0i3J6T0HS6Wrrd5zudYWMw>.
>  
> Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Crime_Control_and_Safe_Streets_Act_of_1968>
>  
> (1968): Prohibited interstate 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> trade in handguns 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handgun>, increased the minimum age to 21 
> for buying handguns. Gun Control Act of 1968 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968> (“GCA†): 
> Focuses primarily on regulating interstate commerce 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> in firearms by 
> generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except among licensed 
> manufacturers, dealers and importers. Firearm Owners Protection Act 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act> (“FOPA†
> ) (1986): Revised and partially repealed the Gun Control Act of 1968. 
> Prohibited the sale to civilians of automatic firearms 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_firearm> manufactured after the 
> date of the law’s passage. Required ATF approval of transfers of 
> automatic firearms. 
> If I end up in Washington, I plan to work very closely with the Gun 
> Owners Of America <http://www.gunowners.org/>, the Idaho Second Amendment 
> Alliance <https://www.idahosaa.org/> and other pro-gun groups to draft 
> legislation which will fully restore our Second Amendment rights.
>
> If you believe in what we are trying to do, I hope that you will support 
> us <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. Whenever 
> the left takes power, they unashamedly try to advance their anti-gun 
> agenda. But when the right takes power, they seem to think that the status 
> quo is okay.
>
> The status quo is not okay, and now is the time to fight harder than ever 
> for the rights that are guaranteed to us by the Second Amendment.
>
> Michael Snyder <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/> is a 
> Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional 
> District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his 
> official 
> website <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. His 
> new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters†
> <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A> is available in paperback and for the Kindle on 
> Amazon.com <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A>.
> [image: []] 
> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:yIl2AUoC8zA>
>  
>   [image: []] 
> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:gIN9vFwOqvQ>
>  [image: 
> []] 
> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:qj6IDK7rITs>
>  [image: 
> []] 
> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:V_sGLiPBpWU>
>  [image: 
> []] 
> <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:l6gmwiTKsz0>
>  
> You are subscribed to email updates from The American Dream 
> <http://endoftheamericandream.com>.
> To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now 
> <https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=PUqP-8wQoWiQt5ehZwMHdhStWfE>.
>  
> Email delivery powered by Google 
> Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United 
> States 
>
>
>
> -- 
> -- 
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>  
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to