We obviously have very different interpretations of how and why the Second Amendment was written the way it was. I'll leave it at that.
On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 3:29:39 PM UTC-5, MJ wrote: > > > > Personal? > I have no problems with English grammar, while you demonstrably do -- > hence the discussion which ensued. > > Again ... > A *nominative absolute* is a noun phrase that begins or ends a sentence. > The phrase has no grammatical connection with the rest of the sentence. > Most *nominative *absolutes contain a participle or participial phrase > which modifies the noun or pronoun. > > Let's make it simpler ... > > [BECAUSE] > > > *A well regulated Militia [is] necessary to the security of a free State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. *Have > you ever diagrammed a sentence? THAT might aid you if you continue to have > difficulties. > > [image: Emacs!] > > > > Professor Levy merely made substitutions in an effort to light the bulb. > > Regard$, > --MJ > > "Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the > birth-right of an American." -- Pennsylvanian Trench Cox > > > > > > At 02:14 PM 7/20/2017, you wrote: > > Define "well regulated" as it applies to a militia. > > Professor Levy's quote applies to "a well-educated electorate," not a > "well regulated militia." Apples and oranges. > > Why are you attempting to make the discussion personal? > > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:11:41 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote: You mean the > nominative absolute? You *do* grasp simple English grammar? > Regard$, --MJ > "A well-educated electorate being necessary for self-governance in a free > state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be > infringed." Is there anyone who would suggest that means only registered > voters have a right to read?" -- Robert Levy, Georgetown University > professor > > > > > At 10:01 AM 7/20/2017, you wrote: > > Another author who decouples the Second Amendment, ignoring the first half > pertaining to "A well regulated militia . . . " > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 8:16:36 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > *We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground’ In Every Stary State, Abolish > The BATFE, And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws > <http://endoftheamericandream.com> * > > > > > > ------------------------------ > We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground•€™ In Every State, Abolish The > BATFE, And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws Posted: 18 Jul 2017 07:50 PM > PDT > > [image: []] > <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/we-need-to-pass-stand-your-ground-in-every-state-abolish-the-batfe-and-repeal-the-major-federal-gun-laws/gun-girls-silhouette-public-domain#main> > > > <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/we-need-to-pass-stand-your-ground-in-every-state-abolish-the-batfe-and-repeal-the-major-federal-gun-laws/gun-girls-silhouette-public-domain#main>Throughout > > history, dictators and tyrants have always wanted to take guns away from > the people. Hitler confiscated guns once he took power in Germany, Stalin > confiscated guns in Soviet Russia, and Mao confiscated guns when the > communists took power in China. An armed population is one of the > cornerstones of a free society, and our founders understood this very well. > Unfortunately, most Americans don’t seem em to understand the Second > Amendment in our day and time. The following is what the Second Amendment > actually says…¦ > > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. > > The phrase “shall not be infringedââ‚€ was intended to leave no room > for confusion. Unfortunately, all sorts of restrictions have been put on > our absolute right to keep and bear arms over time, and we need to fight to > fully restore our rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. A lot of > politicians say that they are “pro-gugun†, but most of them will only > go so far. To me, being “pro-gunâ†means that you should be fighting > to fully restore our Second Amendment rights. In particular, the following > are three areas where many “p“pro-gun†politicians are often quite > weak… #1 We Need Stand Your Ground Laws In All 50 States If you are not > familiar with “stand your grounund†laws, the following is how > Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law> defines > them… > > A stand-your-ground law (sometimes called “line in n the sand†or > “no duty to retreat <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_toto_retreat>†> law) is a justification > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_%28jurisprudence%29> in a > criminal case, whereby defendants can “stand their ground†and use > force without retreating, in order to protect and defend themselves or > others against threats or perceived threats. An example is where there is > no duty to retreat from any place where they have a lawful right to be, and > that they may use any level of force if they reasonably believe the threat > rises to the level of being an imminent and immediate threat of serious > bodily harm or death. One case > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawkins_v._State> describes “the > ‘stand your groundround’ law… a person has a right to to expect > absolute safety in a place they have a right to be, and may use deadly > force to repel an unlawful intruder.†[1] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-youur-ground_law#cite_note-DS-1> Today, > 28 states have adopted “stand your grouound†laws formally, and a few > others have adopted “stand your groundâ†in practice. But even where > such laws have been passed formally, they are often way too weak. We need > very strong “stand your groundâ†laws in all 50 states, and we need > to keep fighting for this until we get it done. #2 We Need To Abolish The > BATFE The BATFE has been used as a political weapon for decades, and > there have been many instances where the authority that it has been given > has been greatly abused. The following example comes from Breitbart > <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/03/report-atf-bypassing-restrictions-compile-information-u-s-gun-owners/> > … > > A recently released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report shows > that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) > violated restrictions to compile information on U.S. gun owners. According > to the report, the ATF “has 25 fireaearms-related data systems, 16 of > which contain retail firearms purchaser information from a federal firearms > licensee (FFL)—such as firearms importers and retaillers.†Sixteen of > these systems contain â₂¬œretail firearms purchaser information,†as > it pertains to guns purchased froom a federal firearms license holder (FFL). > > Many have suggested reforming the BATFE, but I believe that the best > approach would be to abolish it altogether. If we fully restored Second > Amendment rights in this country there would be very little for this agency > to do anyway, and any essential functions could easily be taken over by > other federal law enforcement institutions. > #3 We Need To Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws > We have lived with some of these laws for so long that most people just > assume that they are constitutional. There are so many federal laws that > need to be repealed, but I think that a good place to start would be with > these four major ones > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States>… National > Firearms Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act> > (“NFA†) (1934)934): Taxes the manufacture and transfer of, and > mandates the registration of Title II weapons > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_II_weapons> such as machine guns > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_gun>, short-barreled rifles > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-barreled_rifle> and shotguns, heavy > weapons, explosive ordnance, silencers > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressor>, and disguised or improvised > firearms > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FImprovised_firearms&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNE4GrcE0i3J6T0HS6Wrrd5zudYWMw>. > > Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Crime_Control_and_Safe_Streets_Act_of_1968> > > (1968): Prohibited interstate > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> trade in handguns > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handgun>, increased the minimum age to 21 > for buying handguns. Gun Control Act of 1968 > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968> (“GCA†): > Focusesuses primarily on regulating interstate commerce > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> in firearms by > generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except among licensed > manufacturers, dealers and importers. Firearm Owners Protection Act > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act> > (“FOPA•€ ) (1986): Revised and partially repealed the Gun Control > Act of 1968. Prohibited the sale to civilians of automatic firearms > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_firearm> manufactured after the > date of the law’™s passage. Required ATF approval of transfers of > automatic firearms. If I end up in Washington, I plan to work very > closely with the Gun Owners Of America <http://www.gunowners.org/>, the > Idaho Second Amendment Alliance <https://www.idahosaa.org/> and other > pro-gun groups to draft legislation which will fully restore our Second > Amendment rights. > If you believe in what we are trying to do, I hope that you will support > us <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. Whenever > the left takes power, they unashamedly try to advance their anti-gun > agenda. But when the right takes power, they seem to think that the status > quo is okay. > The status quo is not okay, and now is the time to fight harder than ever > for the rights that are guaranteed to us by the Second Amendment. > > Michael Snyder <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/> is a > Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho‬™s First Congressional > District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his > official > website <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. His > new book entitled â€ÅÅ“Living A Life That Really Matters†> <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A>is available in paperback and for the Kindle on > Amazon.com <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A>. [image: []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:yIl2AUoC8zA> > > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:yIl2AUoC8zA> >  > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:gIN9vFwOqvQ> > [image: > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:gIN9vFwOqvQ>[image: > > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:qj6IDK7rITs> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:qj6IDK7rITs> > [image: > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:V_sGLiPBpWU> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:V_sGLiPBpWU>[image: > > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:l6gmwiTKsz0> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:l6gmwiTKsz0> > You > are subscribed to email updates from The American Dream > <http://endoftheamericandream.com>. To stop receiving these emails, you > may unsubscribe now > <https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=PUqP-8wQoWiQt5ehZwMHdhStWfE>. > > Email delivery powered by Google Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, > Mountain View, CA 94043, United States > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For > options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum  * > Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active > and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking > news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed > to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this > group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to > [email protected]. For more options, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 3:29:39 PM UTC-5, MJ wrote: > > > > Personal? > I have no problems with English grammar, while you demonstrably do -- > hence the discussion which ensued. > > Again ... > A *nominative absolute* is a noun phrase that begins or ends a sentence. > The phrase has no grammatical connection with the rest of the sentence. > Most *nominative *absolutes contain a participle or participial phrase > which modifies the noun or pronoun. > > Let's make it simpler ... > > [BECAUSE] > > > *A well regulated Militia [is] necessary to the security of a free State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. *Have > you ever diagrammed a sentence? THAT might aid you if you continue to have > difficulties. > > [image: Emacs!] > > > > Professor Levy merely made substitutions in an effort to light the bulb. > > Regard$, > --MJ > > "Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the > birth-right of an American." -- Pennsylvanian Trench Cox > > > > > > At 02:14 PM 7/20/2017, you wrote: > > Define "well regulated" as it applies to a militia. > > Professor Levy's quote applies to "a well-educated electorate," not a > "well regulated militia." Apples and oranges. > > Why are you attempting to make the discussion personal? > > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:11:41 AM UTC-5, MJ wrote: You mean the > nominative absolute? You *do* grasp simple English grammar? > Regard$, --MJ > "A well-educated electorate being necessary for self-governance in a free > state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be > infringed." Is there anyone who would suggest that means only registered > voters have a right to read?" -- Robert Levy, Georgetown University > professor > > > > > At 10:01 AM 7/20/2017, you wrote: > > Another author who decouples the Second Amendment, ignoring the first half > pertaining to "A well regulated militia . . . " > On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 8:16:36 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > *We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground’ In Every Stary State, Abolish > The BATFE, And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws > <http://endoftheamericandream.com> * > > > > > > ------------------------------ > We Need To Pass ‘Stand Your Ground•€™ In Every State, Abolish The > BATFE, And Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws Posted: 18 Jul 2017 07:50 PM > PDT > > [image: []] > <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/we-need-to-pass-stand-your-ground-in-every-state-abolish-the-batfe-and-repeal-the-major-federal-gun-laws/gun-girls-silhouette-public-domain#main> > > > <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/we-need-to-pass-stand-your-ground-in-every-state-abolish-the-batfe-and-repeal-the-major-federal-gun-laws/gun-girls-silhouette-public-domain#main>Throughout > > history, dictators and tyrants have always wanted to take guns away from > the people. Hitler confiscated guns once he took power in Germany, Stalin > confiscated guns in Soviet Russia, and Mao confiscated guns when the > communists took power in China. An armed population is one of the > cornerstones of a free society, and our founders understood this very well. > Unfortunately, most Americans don’t seem em to understand the Second > Amendment in our day and time. The following is what the Second Amendment > actually says…¦ > > A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, > the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. > > The phrase “shall not be infringedââ‚€ was intended to leave no room > for confusion. Unfortunately, all sorts of restrictions have been put on > our absolute right to keep and bear arms over time, and we need to fight to > fully restore our rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. A lot of > politicians say that they are “pro-gugun†, but most of them will only > go so far. To me, being “pro-gunâ†means that you should be fighting > to fully restore our Second Amendment rights. In particular, the following > are three areas where many “p“pro-gun†politicians are often quite > weak… #1 We Need Stand Your Ground Laws In All 50 States If you are not > familiar with “stand your grounund†laws, the following is how > Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law> defines > them… > > A stand-your-ground law (sometimes called “line in n the sand†or > “no duty to retreat <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_toto_retreat>†> law) is a justification > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_%28jurisprudence%29> in a > criminal case, whereby defendants can “stand their ground†and use > force without retreating, in order to protect and defend themselves or > others against threats or perceived threats. An example is where there is > no duty to retreat from any place where they have a lawful right to be, and > that they may use any level of force if they reasonably believe the threat > rises to the level of being an imminent and immediate threat of serious > bodily harm or death. One case > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawkins_v._State> describes “the > ‘stand your groundround’ law… a person has a right to to expect > absolute safety in a place they have a right to be, and may use deadly > force to repel an unlawful intruder.†[1] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-youur-ground_law#cite_note-DS-1> Today, > 28 states have adopted “stand your grouound†laws formally, and a few > others have adopted “stand your groundâ†in practice. But even where > such laws have been passed formally, they are often way too weak. We need > very strong “stand your groundâ†laws in all 50 states, and we need > to keep fighting for this until we get it done. #2 We Need To Abolish The > BATFE The BATFE has been used as a political weapon for decades, and > there have been many instances where the authority that it has been given > has been greatly abused. The following example comes from Breitbart > <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/03/report-atf-bypassing-restrictions-compile-information-u-s-gun-owners/> > … > > A recently released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report shows > that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) > violated restrictions to compile information on U.S. gun owners. According > to the report, the ATF “has 25 fireaearms-related data systems, 16 of > which contain retail firearms purchaser information from a federal firearms > licensee (FFL)—such as firearms importers and retaillers.†Sixteen of > these systems contain â₂¬œretail firearms purchaser information,†as > it pertains to guns purchased froom a federal firearms license holder (FFL). > > Many have suggested reforming the BATFE, but I believe that the best > approach would be to abolish it altogether. If we fully restored Second > Amendment rights in this country there would be very little for this agency > to do anyway, and any essential functions could easily be taken over by > other federal law enforcement institutions. > #3 We Need To Repeal The Major Federal Gun Laws > We have lived with some of these laws for so long that most people just > assume that they are constitutional. There are so many federal laws that > need to be repealed, but I think that a good place to start would be with > these four major ones > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_law_in_the_United_States>… National > Firearms Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act> > (“NFA†) (1934)934): Taxes the manufacture and transfer of, and > mandates the registration of Title II weapons > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_II_weapons> such as machine guns > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_gun>, short-barreled rifles > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-barreled_rifle> and shotguns, heavy > weapons, explosive ordnance, silencers > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppressor>, and disguised or improvised > firearms > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FImprovised_firearms&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNE4GrcE0i3J6T0HS6Wrrd5zudYWMw>. > > Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omnibus_Crime_Control_and_Safe_Streets_Act_of_1968> > > (1968): Prohibited interstate > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> trade in handguns > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handgun>, increased the minimum age to 21 > for buying handguns. Gun Control Act of 1968 > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_Control_Act_of_1968> (“GCA†): > Focusesuses primarily on regulating interstate commerce > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_commerce> in firearms by > generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except among licensed > manufacturers, dealers and importers. Firearm Owners Protection Act > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act> > (“FOPA•€ ) (1986): Revised and partially repealed the Gun Control > Act of 1968. Prohibited the sale to civilians of automatic firearms > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_firearm> manufactured after the > date of the law’™s passage. Required ATF approval of transfers of > automatic firearms. If I end up in Washington, I plan to work very > closely with the Gun Owners Of America <http://www.gunowners.org/>, the > Idaho Second Amendment Alliance <https://www.idahosaa.org/> and other > pro-gun groups to draft legislation which will fully restore our Second > Amendment rights. > If you believe in what we are trying to do, I hope that you will support > us <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. Whenever > the left takes power, they unashamedly try to advance their anti-gun > agenda. But when the right takes power, they seem to think that the status > quo is okay. > The status quo is not okay, and now is the time to fight harder than ever > for the rights that are guaranteed to us by the Second Amendment. > > Michael Snyder <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/> is a > Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho‬™s First Congressional > District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his > official > website <https://www.michaelsnyderforcongress.com/contribute.html>. His > new book entitled â€ÅÅ“Living A Life That Really Matters†> <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A>is available in paperback and for the Kindle on > Amazon.com <http://amzn.to/2t5bx4A>. [image: []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:yIl2AUoC8zA> > > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:yIl2AUoC8zA> >  > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:gIN9vFwOqvQ> > [image: > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:gIN9vFwOqvQ>[image: > > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:qj6IDK7rITs> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:qj6IDK7rITs> > [image: > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:V_sGLiPBpWU> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:V_sGLiPBpWU>[image: > > []] > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:l6gmwiTKsz0> > > <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/endoftheamericandream/OFri?a=B275liYFiLU:X9qrd2E0Tw0:l6gmwiTKsz0> > You > are subscribed to email updates from The American Dream > <http://endoftheamericandream.com>. To stop receiving these emails, you > may unsubscribe now > <https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=PUqP-8wQoWiQt5ehZwMHdhStWfE>. > > Email delivery powered by Google Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, > Mountain View, CA 94043, United States > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For > options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum  * > Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active > and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking > news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed > to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this > group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to > [email protected]. For more options, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
