One fantasy after another On Nov 11, 12:45 pm, Jim Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While socialist liberals are dancing in the streets upon the election > of their messiah, “Barack the merciful” they seemingly miss a cogent, > prescient point. Simply; conservatism won, it always does. Recently > published exit polls confirm this truism. According to Rasmussen and > his staff of capable scribes, 59% of voters agreed with the Reagan > mantra; “Government is not the solution, government is the problem”. > The same percentage held true on taxes and overwhelmingly felt Osama > Obama would lower their taxes. > > To me that posit is striking. Republicans have let the democrats steal > the fiscal responsibility bone and bury it in Lilliputian liberal > town. Yet, we have to take responsibility, “somewhat” for our > candidate of choice. Let’s face a reality; a stark and harsh > pragmatism. The Republican Party hasn’t produced a conservative leader > since Ronald Reagan. Dubya slipped under our radar with that, > “compassionate conservative” tripe and increased the federal > bureaucracy with Medicare prescription drugs. And, lest we suborn > recent history; conservatives must admit a failing. It is that we > defended Bush, in earnest, only because the left assailed him. After > all, it is more than apparent that he is not a dyed in the wool > conservative and never was. Perhaps Sarah Palin is right; Bush is > somewhat faulted for our current loss because of his stray from the > tenets of conservatives, blighting the republican brand. > > True, we did nominate and support a brain dead, immigration wielding > un-willing idiot for the top of our ticket. Though, he did promulgate > unto the national stage the next Reagan, in a dress, sporting an > assault rifle. > Still, the postmortem is undeniably positive, though short term a gray > pale has been cast on the American horizon. Obama, in the last two > electoral months was cast a tax cutter; strictly a conservative > principal. This right turn, “as it were” did cement in my most fertile > cranium a constant, an imperative. On the naming of Sarah Palin the > oxygen left the Obama campaign and forced this Marxists to Reaganism. > So, after all, conservatism won, even if it was a lie. > > Yet, draw close and hold dear these presents; conservatives have a > farm team, back benchers to date, though, in 2012 two names will be > called upon for our revival. They are Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal. I > suspect Mr. Reagan would approve. > Conservative Springfield 11 Nov 08 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
