Ramakazee, With brilliant thinking like that your secret identiy is ob viously head offensive coach for the Rams.
On Nov 11, 11:41 am, Kamakazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get it. > > The lack of principles is, in fact, a principle (i.e., a law to have > no laws is a law in and of itself). > > You rock. > > On Nov 11, 11:33 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > They are just principles that differ from yours dummy. Buy a fucking > > dictionary. > > > On Nov 11, 10:09 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Understood holly... > > > > It must be nice being a Democrat, and not having such problems. > > > > Since none of you stand for any principles. > > > > On Nov 11, 8:03 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > Correct. In the long run the terrible ass-kicking you boys just got > > > > may be the best thing that ever happened to you. What's important is > > > > how you all hash out and decide just what your core principles really > > > > are. > > > > > On Nov 10, 8:02 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Actually, he is correct. > > > > > > This will cause the Republicans to go back to their core principles, > > > > > finally. > > > > > > On Nov 10, 5:57 pm, studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 10, 8:45 pm, Jim Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > While socialist liberals are dancing in the streets upon the > > > > > > > election > > > > > > > of their messiah, “Barack the merciful” they seemingly miss a > > > > > > > cogent, > > > > > > > prescient point. > > > > > > > Well, I suppose it's better than dancing in the streets to another > > > > > > clueless > > > > > > neo-con nincompoop. > > > > > > > > Simply; conservatism won, it always does. > > > > > > > Sure it did, keep dreaming. > > > > > > > > Yet, draw close and hold dear these presents; conservatives have a > > > > > > > farm team, back benchers to date, though, in 2012 two names will > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > called upon for our revival. They are Sarah Palin and Bobby > > > > > > > Jindal. > > > > > > > Oh brother. > > > > > > Whoever wrote this is living in a dream state. > > > > > > It's other Republicans who are dissing Palin in order to get her out > > > > > > of > > > > > > the 2012 spotlight. > > > > > > It would be a sure losing ticket. > > > > > > > > I suspect Mr. Reagan would approve. > > > > > > > I suspect the writer is dreaming again.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
