Gaar,

How fucking stupid are you?
You said "specifically tax entertainers" NOT "tax specific
entertainers".
Fucking moron.

On Nov 12, 5:20 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do youthink I used the term "specifically"?
>
> And you think ALL Entertainers and Athletes don't agree with me?
>
> Just how stupid are you?
>
> On Nov 12, 3:11 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Gaar,
>
> > Most professional entertainers and professional athletes that you seem
> > to refer to ARE "the rich" you idiot.
>
> > You need to re-title your thread "Instead of taxing the rich people
> > who agree with me, tax rich people who do not agree with me". Idiot.
>
> > On Nov 12, 4:53 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > How about we specifically Tax Entertainers at 90%?
>
> > > And how about some Professional Athletes?
>
> > > You know, the People who think they are smart enough to tell the rest
> > > of us that we should be giving more but rarely ever do such things in
> > > their personal Lives?!?!?!?!?
>
> > > Let's see how they like their Wealth being redistributed to the
> > > masses...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to