It isn't a misquote holly, it is a misunderstanding... I cited the People who tell us what to do but not do it themself for a reason.
You are free to ignore it all you like. But you might want to stop with the comprehension comments when you are unable to do such things yourself... On Nov 12, 5:26 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gaar, > > Show me where I misquoted you. > > On Nov 12, 7:14 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hmmmm... > > > Interesting how you took that to mean that I believe they ALL do that, > > rather than just Targeting the one's that actually do. > > > On Nov 12, 5:02 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Gaar, > > > > Let me dumb it down for you. > > > > 1. You said "specifically tax entertainers". > > > 2. THEN you said "you know the People who think they are smart enough > > > to tell the rest of us that we should.............." > > > 3. So it was really you that was implying entertainers all DISAGREE > > > with you. > > > 4. Don't know why you were willing to let SOME athletes off the hook. > > > Maybe you were assuming some NASCAR drivers would be on your side? Who > > > the fuck knows? > > > > On Nov 12, 6:37 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yep. > > > > > Again, you think ALL Entertainers agree with me? > > > > > Had I said what you have admitted I did not, then you could make your > > > > silly ass accusation. > > > > > On Nov 12, 4:21 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > How fucking stupid are you? > > > > > You said "specifically tax entertainers" NOT "tax specific > > > > > entertainers". > > > > > Fucking moron. > > > > > > On Nov 12, 5:20 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Why do youthink I used the term "specifically"? > > > > > > > And you think ALL Entertainers and Athletes don't agree with me? > > > > > > > Just how stupid are you? > > > > > > > On Nov 12, 3:11 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > Most professional entertainers and professional athletes that you > > > > > > > seem > > > > > > > to refer to ARE "the rich" you idiot. > > > > > > > > You need to re-title your thread "Instead of taxing the rich > > > > > > > people > > > > > > > who agree with me, tax rich people who do not agree with me". > > > > > > > Idiot. > > > > > > > > On Nov 12, 4:53 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > How about we specifically Tax Entertainers at 90%? > > > > > > > > > And how about some Professional Athletes? > > > > > > > > > You know, the People who think they are smart enough to tell > > > > > > > > the rest > > > > > > > > of us that we should be giving more but rarely ever do such > > > > > > > > things in > > > > > > > > their personal Lives?!?!?!?!? > > > > > > > > > Let's see how they like their Wealth being redistributed to the > > > > > > > > masses...- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
