Interesting thet Holly wants the "author" of the article whereas no author
was listed, only that the research was directed by George Barka, the founder
of The Barka Group who published the article. Their website is located at
the bottom of the article and if Holly werent a ruderal he could have gone
to the website and gotten the email address of their contact person. Which I
did and he can go do his own research as I am not doing it for him. Travis
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I guess you were just signing your comment "hick" then, and not
> directing that comment at Travis in regard to the mistake you were
> noting?
>
> Give me a break.
>
> Instead of apologizing for your mistake, you are now going to deny you
> did it?
>
>
> On Nov 12, 9:21 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gaar,
> >
> > What the fuck is it with you and the word BLAME? What the fuck did I
> > blame Travis FOR? At the time I made the comment Travis was the ONLY
> > poster prior to my posting. So, who the fuck was i supposed to address
> > my comment to if not him??
> > Are you drunk? Fuck it, i think I'll just ignore your "suggestion". My
> > sole comment was about the CONTENT of the article, specifically the
> > thread title. Didn't say shit ABOUT Travis specifically other than to
> > close my post to him with "hick", which i almost always do. Same as
> > you close many of your posts to me with "idiot" or "hypocrite.
> >
> > Good night you two, I'm going to bed and dream the sweet dreams of the
> > pure of heart. :-)
> >
> > On Nov 12, 11:00 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > No, I just don't think you should have blamed Travis.
> >
> > > I don't care if you comment or not TO the Author, just suggested any
> > > comments about the Title should have been made ABOUT the AUthor, and
> > > not Travis.
> >
> > > And you rail me for comprehension problems?
> >
> > > Hypocrite.
> >
> > > On Nov 12, 8:58 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Travis,
> >
> > > > Thanks, but I didn't ask for a web site. I asked for the original
> > > > author's e-mail address as Mr. Hard Head seems to think i should have
> > > > addressed by comment to him/her as oppossed to you. No idea in the
> > > > fucking world why he would think that.
> >
> > > > On Nov 12, 10:54 pm, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > H: here is their website which you could have seen if you had
> loooked at
> > > > > the bottom of the article.www.barna.org
> >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Hollywood <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Gaar,
> >
> > > > > > Have you gone completely fucking mental?
> > > > > > I've addressed this. The only problem that exists is in your hard
> > > > > > head. Any problem here is of your creation. Piss off.
> >
> > > > > > On Nov 12, 9:54 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > On Nov 12, 7:03 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > If the goal of Travis was to simply stimulate
> debate/conversation then
> > > > > > > > he succeded, i commented. So where's the problem.
> >
> > > > > > > The problem is in your trying to blame Travis for the Title...
> >
> > > > > > > Say what you like about it, but blame the person who wrote it,
> not the
> > > > > > > person who posted it.
> >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--
*~@):~{>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
