It will essentially silence them, since Advertisers have SHOWN they don't wish to sponsor Loony Liberal tripe...
So it will in fact provide LESS Free Speech, and not more, which was one of the conditions the SCOTUS said it needed to STRIKE IT DOWN as UnConstitutional. So please, go ahead and pass it little Liar mikey, so we can finally get it Ruled as unConstitutional. On Nov 16, 9:57 am, OMS-II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yep censor conservatives and their voice of reason against the wacko > dems. > =========================== > The goal isn't to censor conservatives; rather, it is to force them to > give free air time on paid-for programs. > > On Nov 11, 6:50 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > yep censor conservatives and their voice of reason against the wacko > > dems. more gestapo tactics by the incoming hitler regime. the > > reeducation camps cannot be far behind. > > > On Nov 11, 6:32 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > no we were talking about the fairness doctrine that ensures free > > > speech for all . > > > > On Nov 11, 6:19 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > je reeducation camps cannot be > > >heir > are you talkin bout the censorship doctrine? you know the doctrine > > > > that censors conservative talk radio while emboldening liberal > > > > outlets. > > > > > On Nov 11, 3:09 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > i hate to break it to you but the fairness doctrine has never been > > > > > ruled unconstitutional . next time do a little research ! > > > > > > On Nov 10, 8:04 pm, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > talkin bout the censor> On Nov 9, 3:11 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > please show how and where the fairness doctrine violated the > > > > > > constitution ! > > > > > > > ==== > > > > > > > How about for starters, that little clause that states, "Congress > > > > > > shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the > > > > > > press..." > > > > > > > I doubt if you have ever read the document, but assuming for a > > > > > > second > > > > > > that I am incorrect, and you have read the document, it is clear > > > > > > from > > > > > > a number of your postings that you don't understand the verbiage. > > > > > > You > > > > > > are not alone, Senator Charles Schumer has for years demonstrated > > > > > > that > > > > > > he does not understand the Constitution of the United States, yet > > > > > > Moonbats in New York continue to re-elect this Anti-American. > > > > > > > With regard to a new, revised Fairness Doctrine, I think the > > > > > > socialists are biting off more than they can proverbially chew. As > > > > > > I > > > > > > understand it, this bill would apply to all forms of media, that are > > > > > > open, public airwaves. This would include ABC, NBC and CBS, so in > > > > > > essence, it will mean the demise of their biased news broadcasts. > > > > > > The > > > > > > same goes for shows like The View, Boston Legal, well, damn near > > > > > > everything that is produced in California would have to be afforded > > > > > > equal time. > > > > > > > Excuse my language, but I can think of no better > > > > > > term....."Clusterfuck" comes to mind....- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -he w- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
