your assumption is incorrect i never lie and i was indeed calling for the fairness doctrine to be reinstated for many years now .
On Nov 16, 12:55 pm, OMS-II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no we were talking about the fairness doctrine that ensures free > speech for all . > ============================ > Your argument is an intellectually dishonest one. No one brought this > up while AirAmerica was on the air. What you really are saying is that > you want "free" speech for liberals on conservative talk shows that > are paid for by advertising sold by the conservatives to pay for their > shows. > > At least be honest about what you want, mike. You do a disservice to > liberals by lying about your intentions. > > On Nov 11, 6:32 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > no we were talking about the fairness doctrine that ensures free > > speech for all . > > > On Nov 11, 6:19 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > are you talkin bout the censorship doctrine? you know the doctrine > > > that censors conservative talk radio while emboldening liberal > > > outlets. > > > > On Nov 11, 3:09 am, "mike [move on] 532" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > i hate to break it to you but the fairness doctrine has never been > > > > ruled unconstitutional . next time do a little research ! > > > > > On Nov 10, 8:04 pm, KeithInTampa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > talkin bout the censor> On Nov 9, 3:11 am, "mike [Chief Moonbat] 532" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > please show how and where the fairness doctrine violated the > > > > > constitution ! > > > > > > ==== > > > > > > How about for starters, that little clause that states, "Congress > > > > > shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the > > > > > press..." > > > > > > I doubt if you have ever read the document, but assuming for a second > > > > > that I am incorrect, and you have read the document, it is clear from > > > > > a number of your postings that you don't understand the verbiage. You > > > > > are not alone, Senator Charles Schumer has for years demonstrated that > > > > > he does not understand the Constitution of the United States, yet > > > > > Moonbats in New York continue to re-elect this Anti-American. > > > > > > With regard to a new, revised Fairness Doctrine, I think the > > > > > socialists are biting off more than they can proverbially chew. As I > > > > > understand it, this bill would apply to all forms of media, that are > > > > > open, public airwaves. This would include ABC, NBC and CBS, so in > > > > > essence, it will mean the demise of their biased news broadcasts. The > > > > > same goes for shows like The View, Boston Legal, well, damn near > > > > > everything that is produced in California would have to be afforded > > > > > equal time. > > > > > > Excuse my language, but I can think of no better > > > > > term....."Clusterfuck" comes to mind....- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
