gaar, I'm back, got cold.
Be my guest. I'll be more than happy to point it out if your full of shit. You're a hoot lad, a statement such as you loosely describe has yet to be made but you have the arrogance to just assume that you will, of course, "rightly" point it out. You taking the approach that "it is if I SAY it is?" Get a grip. On Nov 16, 3:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's fine with me holly... > > You can just expect that when you simply make it about the "messemger" > I will rightly point out that you are making an Ad Hominem Attack, no > matter how many other ignorant people, like you, that there are. > > Capiche? > > On Nov 16, 1:14 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > gaar, > > > Have you gone bonkers? I'll decide what I wish to ask, not you. > > Who do you think you are? Your arrogance is not exactly becoming lad, > > not an attractive attribute. > > I am finished with you for the time being. it's a sunny day here in > > STL and I'm going to go out and enjoy it. > > > On Nov 16, 2:30 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yes holly, and that is ALL you asked for... > > > > Had you been able to address ANY of his argument, and then made that > > > point, it would have not been as I said. > > > > That FACT that is ALL you did makes it what it is. > > > > Not my fault you Idiots do such things, I simply point them out. > > > > On Nov 16, 12:13 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > gaar, > > > > > What did I say "against the man"? I asked what credientials he had > > > > that would make him "tops" in his field. > > > > I have to show his theory is flawed BEFORE I dare ask what his > > > > credentials are? Ridiculous! > > > > I did in fact make no rebuttal whatsoever of his theory. I asked YOU > > > > "who says he's tops" in his field. Your getting more and more > > > > ridiculous lad. > > > > > On Nov 16, 1:14 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Asked and answered. > > > > > > Care to discuss anything he has said, or just discuss him? > > > > > > You understand that Ad Hominem is Latin for "against the man", right? > > > > > > So when you concentrate your argument "against the man" that is > > > > > presenting it, you are in fact commiting an Ad Hominem attack. > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > Now, had you questioned his "Theory" and SHOWN it to be flawed in a > > > > > general psychiatrive sense, then it would be well and good to question > > > > > his credentioals. When you make that your ONLY REBUTTAL, it is in > > > > > FACT an Ad Hominem Attack. > > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:10 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > No, saying that his momma is a ho or that he is an ignorant ass is a > > > > > > personal attack. Asking for someone's credentials when it is claimed > > > > > > that they are a "top psychiatrist" and make sweeping generalizations > > > > > > about huge portions of the population is in no way an attack. > > > > > > Inquiring minds want to know. > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2:05 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, holly... > > > > > > > > When you ignore his argument to only try to discuss him, you are > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > fact commiting an Ad Hominem attack. > > > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:00 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > Your getting as hyper-sensitive as a pre-teen little girl. > > > > > > > > Asking for > > > > > > > > a man's credentials is an ATTACK? Ain't you the delicate one? > > > > > > > > Get real lad. Anyone can play war-of-the-experts. > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:43 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 7:43 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > WHO says Dr. Rossiter is a "top psychiatrist"? > > > > > > > > > > Just like a Loony Liberal. > > > > > > > > > > Instead of addressing ANYTHING the man asserts, attack him > > > > > > > > > personally > > > > > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > Same old shit, just another day with these Loony Liberals. > > > > > > > > > > No surprise there.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
