carter, clinton, roosevelt, all far worse presidents.  much worse.
and we will be adding barry to that list soon enough.

On Nov 21, 10:44 am, charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All over the country the newspapers and magazines have reported how
> thrilled black people have been over the final electing of one of
> their kind to be president of the US. . . stories of mothers and
> daughters crying with delight, others jumping and shouting, crowds
> gathering to celebrate . . .
> Personally, I am glad he won the election and have great admiration
> for him.  But even so, the seeming race-reaction is, in a perverse
> way, a sort-of racism in reverse and could end in a destructive
> downtrend in racial relations.
>
> Here is how:  we all know how the media likes to ridicule and
> criticize the president of the US. The media is considered as
> “white.”  Of course, for months and perhaps a whole year, he may will
> do no wrong, but when you look at the impossible tasks ahead, he
> cannot even do the right thing without alienating one group after
> another.
>
> For example: he has promised to curb special interest power.
> Congressmen depend upon the special interests to supplement their
> otherwise low wages.  Their salaries are kept low because the public
> is so disgusted with “politics” that it fights ever effort our
> legislators have ever made to keep their salaries up with the cost of
> living.  So, they depend upon special interest “campaign
> contributions” and other perks.  If he alienates them, he cannot get
> his legislative programs through Congress.
>
> Another example: he promised to deal with the medical insurance
> problem, but there are not enough doctors.  People do not want to
> become doctors because their lives are filled with paperwork,
> malpractice suit fears, and having to have too many patients in order
> to pay for office staff.  More doctors commit suicide than in any
> other profession.  To reverse all the paperwork needed, remove the
> malpractice liability hazard and attract in more students into
> medicine would mean reversing all the popular “remedies” the
> government had created to protect privacy, right of redress
> (malpractice), insurance work, etc.  Also, there are not enough nurses
> for many of the same reasons there are too few doctors.  How can you
> provide medical care for everyone if there are not even enough doctors
> and nurses to deal properly with just those who can afford medical
> insurance or whose medical insurance is already paid for by the
> government?
>
> Still another example:  he has spoken out against Iran and its nuclear
> program.  Israel is more concerned about that than we are.  Iran shows
> no willingness to stop its program, and if the President is not able
> to make Iran turn from its course, Israel will bomb Iran's nuclear
> facilities.  The only way to prevent a nuclear arms race within Islam
> is to remove nuclear arms from Israel, and no president can even
> suggest such a solution even though we alone are certainly able to
> provide Israel with security considering that we have some 15,000
> nuclear weapons ourselves!  And if Israel bombs Iran, our policy of
> supporting Israel will inexorably lead to us helping her and bombing
> Iran also.
>
> Still another:  Is it really possible to win in Afghanistan, even with
> more troops?  How can we find more troops if we cannot take them from
> Iraq---and if we go to war against Iran, their fellow Shiites in Iraq
> will turn against us and our troop numbers there will need to climb
> again, not drop.  Even if we do find enough troops to double our
> numbers in Afghanistan, is that war really win-able?  It is not a flat
> plane of cities and towns like Iraq.  It is a mountain wilderness
> filled with tough tribesmen who see we failed to build up their
> country after the Taliban were defeated and humiliated.  Since we
> failed the country, they the all started growing opium plants again.
> Finally, the prestige lost by the defeat of the Taliban was gone.
> Their “Cause” of national liberation has enabled them to regain their
> lost status. If they can kick out the Russians, they figure they will
> fight until they kick us out too.
>
> Perhaps the only way to keep from losing in Afghanistan is to keep
> sending more troops.  Ultimately, President Obama would have to
> reinstitute the draft in order to provide them.  How popular would
> that make  the President then?
>
> Next to final example: there are people starving in Tahiti and in the
> Congo right now.  How can the new president give them adequate help
> without making it look like he is helping only black people?  Should
> he become concerned about the starving people in Ceylon and North
> Korea just to lend balance to his program? But what about the growing
> poverty here in the US and across the world?  Who can the President
> afford to neglect?
>
> Lastly, all this does not even include the economic debacle we are now
> in!  How can he please the conservatives cultists who believe
> government should have no regulatory role in the economy but who
> tolerate big government subsidies for the sugar, peanut, corn growing
> and other agricultural interests?  Each time he helps the banks,
> spends new funds to subsidize the mortgage holders and makes more
> stimulus packages, he alienates one or the other interests and
> increased the hate-him animosity level.
>
> Personally, I am impressed with President-elect Obama and wish him
> will, but I consider it inevitable that he will end up being hated by
> large segments of the population before the end of his first term.
>
> On top of all that, consider what would happen if he were to be
> assassinated!  It would throw this country into the worst form of
> despair and turbulence imaginable.
>
> We are entering a dangerous period---thanks to President Bush, the
> worst president we have ever had in the history of this nation.
>
> charleshttp://atheistic-science.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to