mark, What FEC rule/regulation reqires a candidate for POTUS to post a certified copy of his birth certificate online or any other public place for public inspection?
On Nov 25, 5:22 am, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The media bought it. The voters bought it. And now some in Congress > are resisting the idea of congressional hearings because they believe > that Barack Obama's "birth certificate" has been posted online. > > Not so. > > What was posted was not a birth certificate, but something that > resembles a "Certification of Live Birth" or COLB, which, even if > authentic, does not prove "natural born" U.S. citizenship. You see, in > Hawaii, a Certification of Live Birth is issued within a year of a > child's birth to those who register a birth abroad or one that takes > place outside a hospital. > > It's Rathergate all over again with more amiss than a 1970s Selectric > typewriter. But before I tell you what the experts found, let me ask > you a few questions: > > 1. If you were a natural born American citizen and had it within > your means to quiet all the lawsuits and questions with proof, would > you do it? > > 2. If you were a natural born American citizen, would you spend > thousands of dollars to fight the legal cases against you, or would > you simply answer the legitimate question of whether you meet the > constitutional requirements for office? > > 3. If you were a natural born American citizen, would you forge a > document called a "Certification of Live Birth" and tell the public it > was a real "birth certificate"? > > If someone were to violate the law by manufacturing a forgery in order > trick the public, would that be enough evidence for members Congress > to conduct hearings and for a court to issue an order for the critical > records, including the original long-form birth certificate (signed by > the doctor) to ensure that the U.S. constitutional requirements for > office were not violated? After all, Congress is sworn to uphold and > defend that Constitution, and the justices on the U.S. Supreme Court > are "guardians" of the Constitution. That's their job, isn't it? > > Ron Polarik, holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and specializes in > computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, > printers and typewriters, and has come forth with proof more > definitive that the word processor that tried to simulate a 1970s > Selectric typewriter. > > Polarik has submitted a signed affidavit and has now released his > findings on video atwww.ObamaForgery.comwith his identify masked and > voice altered to guard against the carrying out of threats, which he > has already received. > > The Summary: The Certificate of Live Birth documents posted on Mr. > Obama's websitewww.fightthesmears.com, Daily Kos (a pro-Obama blog) > and factcheck.org, (a pro-Obama political research group), were found > to be altered and forged. > > 1. The problem of the pixels: When you have a green patterned > document such as this, there should be a lot of green pixels from the > background showing up between the letters that appear on the > certification. But in this case, instead of green pixels, there are > white and grey pixels between the letters, which result when you > replace existing text with other text. > > 2. There is no second fold line. The pictures show two folds – > necessary to fit any COLB into an envelope for mailing, but the > document itself shows only one fold. This is another indication of > document alteration. > > 3. There's a blurred border. The border has a lower resolution than > the rest of the document, which is another indication that it has been > altered. > > 4. The border is one that is used in 2007 COLBs. As a security > measure, Hawaii changes their borders every year. This is when the > Obama campaign claims the certificate was obtained. That is fine > except for the problem that … > > 5. The seal and signature stamp are from a 2008 COLB. As revealed > by a process called edging, the Hawaiian seal and signature stamp on > the back of the document are revealed to be from the wrong year! > > Like with Rathergate, when you're creating documents, make sure you > use only a typewriter that was invented at the time you report the > document was manufactured. When posting a "Certification of Live > Birth," make sure you "borrow" only from documents used in the same > year! > > http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81943 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
