yes our ecology is a very BFD !

On Dec 3, 6:55 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BFD.  1 degree fluctuation is well with norms for temperature variations.
> And we had an excellent rice crop here in Arkansas.
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://highway7.com/t_enviro/env_0312_food-water.html
> > The prospect of food and water scarcity emerges against a backdrop of
> > concern about global warming. New research by crop ecologists at the
> > International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines and at the
> > U.S. Department of Agriculture indicates that a 1-degree-Celsius rise
> > in temperature (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) above the optimum during the
> > growing season leads to a 10 percent decline in yields of rice, wheat
> > and corn. With four of the past six years being the warmest on
> > record,
> > grain harvests are suffering. High temperatures lowered harvests last
> > year in India and the United States and scorched crops this year from
> > France to Ukraine.
>
> > The new combination of falling water tables and rising temperatures,
> > along with trends such as soil erosion, has led to four consecutive
> > shortfalls in the world grain harvest. This year production fell
> > short
> > of consumption by a record 92 million tons. These shortages have
> > reduced world grain stocks to their lowest levels in 30 years.
>
> > If we have a shortfall in 2004 that is even half the size of this
> > year's, food prices will be rising worldwide by this time next year.
> > You won't have to read about it in the commodity pages. It will be
> > evident at the supermarket checkout counter. During the fall of 2003,
> > wheat and rice prices rose 10 percent to 30 percent in world markets,
> > and even more in some parts of China. These rises may only be the
> > warning tremors before the earthquake.
>
> > We can, however, take measures to improve world food security. We
> > could recognize that population growth and environmental trends
> > threaten economic progress and political stability just as terrorism
> > does. Since the overwhelming majority of the nearly 3 billion people
> > expected to be born during this half-century will be in countries
> > where water tables are already falling and wells are running dry,
> > filling the family planning gap and creating a social environment to
> > foster smaller families is urgent.
>
> > The situation with water today is new, but similar to that with land
> > a
> > half-century ago. Coming out of World War II, we looked toward the
> > end
> > of the century and saw enormous projected growth in population but
> > little new land to plow. The result was a concentrated international
> > effort to raise land productivity; boosting the world grain yields
> > from just over one ton per hectare in 1950 to nearly three tons
> > today.
> > We now need a similar global full-court press to raise water
> > productivity, by shifting to more water-efficient crops, improving
> > irrigation and recycling urban water supplies.
>
> > As it becomes apparent that higher temperatures are shrinking
> > harvests
> > and raising food prices, a powerful new consumer lobby could emerge
> > in
> > support of cutting carbon emissions by moving to a hydrogen-based
> > economy. It is a commentary on the complexity of our time that
> > decisions made in ministries of energy may have a greater effect on
> > future food security than those made in ministries of agriculture.
>
> > On Dec 3, 5:50 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The only problems are the assaholla idiots who think we have
> > environmental
> > > problems and hinder every action to further develop this country and
> > thereby
> > > help other nations.  The total bullshit idea of global warming is going
> > to
> > > do nothing but create a totallitarian state and do nothing to help
> > > anything.  and everyone who thinks there is actually global warming is a
> > > total and complete idiot.
>
> > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Liberal mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > we have a segment of people in America " mostly Republicans " who
> > > > oppose environmental regulations . and anyone who doesn't agree with
> > > > them are labeled tree hugger , Lonnie liberals , hell we all know the
> > > > kind of labels conservatives and anti global warming activists
> > > > use .
> > > > But we are in the middle of a very real crisis that many people are
> > > > ignoring in the name of profits and big business first and all else
> > > > last !  we are setting ourselves up for a climate where water is sold
> > > > to the highest bidder because of shortages and world wide famine
> > > > because big corporations put profits above the human condition . as an
> > > > example of this On Dec. 3, 1984, more than 4,000 people died after a
> > > > cloud of gas escaped from a pesticide plant operated by a Union
> > > > Carbide subsidiary
> > > > in Bhopal,
> > > > India.
> > > > the people of Hatti are eating mud cakes because of
> > > > corporate greed and the trade rules we imposed on them when they
> > > > borrowed money from us .  when will we wake up and realize we do not
> > > > live in a vacuum either in our neighborhoods , towns  cities or
> > > > countries we are all interrelated . we must put aside our differences
> > > > and fix the damage we have done to planet earth before it reaches the
> > > > tipping point and we can't fix it !
>
> > > --
> > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to