her choice, not the schools On Dec 5, 7:09 pm, Running <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > an unfair curtailment of freedom. > > but a chastity ring IS pretty geeky. > > On Dec 5, 6:15 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Once again, educrats have been forced to step in to prevent a British > > schoolgirl from wearing a Christian purity ring. > > > A gift from her mother, 12-year-old Kioni Lansbury's ring signifies > > her intention to refrain from sex until she's married. Still more > > outrageous, these rings reference a passage from the Bible. > > > Wonders Kioni: > > > If people can wear head scarves, why can't I wear a ring? > > > It could be because Christians don't fly planes into buildings, blow > > up buses, and go on homicidal rampages. Or it could be that the ring > > is somehow dangerous, as alleged by the ironically named headteacher > > Faith Jarrett: > > > It's not a case of being religious or anti-religious. We take the > > view that it's potentially dangerous. > > > The open-minded Ms. Jarrett is willing to let Kioni bring the ring to > > school, so long as she keeps it in her bag. If only the ring announced > > her intentions to sleep around and then have an abortion, she could > > wear it with pride. > > >http://www.moonbattery.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
