jgg you are being dishonest once again you made the issue about me !
[ No Mike Hate Speech is a cause the Left demands if it is directed
against THEM...   But the Left also demands the RIGHT to use Hate
Speech against their opponents...   This has always been a
characteristic of our extreme Left ---  one example is you and your
blind hatred of Palin... ]
most of your posts are about me instead of the issues . maybe you
should rethink the reasons you post what you do . i don't want to  get
in a flame war with you or anyone else for that matter i would rather
discus the issues .But so far you seem to want to make every issue a
personal attack against me instead of the  issues .
On Dec 8, 4:02 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take that as you refuse to condemn Hate Speech if done by the
> Left...   The post mike was not about you, but the looney toons you
> run around with ideologically...
>
> On Dec 8, 3:53 pm, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > please show even one example of my supposed hate speech !
>
> > On Dec 8, 12:40 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No Mike Hate Speech is a cause the Left demands if it is directed
> > > against THEM...   But the Left also demands the RIGHT to use Hate
> > > Speech against their opponents...   This has always been a
> > > characteristic of our extreme Left ---  one example is you and your
> > > blind hatred of Palin...
>
> > > As I take a more nuanced POV of "Hate Speech" in that there are two
> > > competing Rights -- Speech or Physical safety - that require all sides
> > > to tolerate verbal stupidity bordering but not crossing over to
> > > physical violence from their opponents...     Now it is best if debate
> > > remains civil, but that condition eliminates the trash talking
> > > extremists love to employ...
>
> > > The Left, if it is honest will accept their role in Hitler-like
> > > attempts to suppress Free Speech on the Right...   Frankly the
> > > attempts by the Left to insist on "Gay Marriage" reminds one of the
> > > Jim Crow advocates pre 1890's or Prohabitionists pre 1918...   Revote
> > > until the result suits you rather than accept the will of the
> > > people...
>
> > > On Dec 8, 11:41 am, mike 532 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > is anti Christian or anti Evangelical there is a big difference !
>
> > > > On Dec 8, 11:15 am, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Or why there should be NO MOB VETO by either the Left of the Right...
>
> > > > >http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2144034/posts
>
> > > > >http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/12/08/backlash-on-prop-8-begins/
>
> > > > > >>> Will Joe ever learn?  How about DENOUNCING the clear hate speech 
> > > > > >>> coming from Prop 8 protesters against those of faith?  How about 
> > > > > >>> taking accountability for the Gay Left’s complete and utter 
> > > > > >>> failure at America’s ballot boxes for the past 20 years?
>
> > > > > Personally, I find the actions of anti-Mormon and anti-Christian
> > > > > bigotry by many Prop 8 losers in California disgusting and
> > > > > outrageously hateful.  It is equally astounding that the Gay Leaders
> > > > > of the USA are turning a blind eye to this simmering gay war on
> > > > > religion.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to