All of this was known to the weapon inspectors. On 22 Dec, 22:05, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > Per the defination UNSC, WMD includes stockpiles, components, > precursors, manufacturing capacity, delivery systems, research into > all the above... > > What was found was > > 1) delivery systems > > 2) components and precursors > > 3) manufacturing capacity > > 4) research programs... > > On Dec 22, 3:57 pm, lef <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What kind of WMD was found in Iraq post 2003? > > > On 22 Dec, 21:21, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Mark Russia sent its soldiers into Georgian territory and unilaterally > > > declared part of Georgia Independent... I note the unwillingness on > > > your part to DISCUSS ideas... For example > > > > If one insisted on facts, talking to most of those who opposed Bush in > > > Iraq would be impossible... Why.. They insist not WMD was found in > > > Iraq post 2003... WMD was found in Iraq, as defined by the > > > UNSC... > > > > But I understand this tactic is meant to NOT DISCUSS ideas while > > > pretending to yourself you are open-minded... > > > > On Dec 22, 1:16 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Russia did NOT invade Georgia. It is a lie. An opposing view point > > > > that begins with an incontrovertable lie is worthless. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:14 PM, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps your bias is why your opinions suck --- you refuse to read > > > > > opposing view points... > > > > > > On Dec 20, 3:06 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> Won't even read it as the title contains a lie. > > > > > >> One can not invade a nation one has been in legally by open and > > > > >> admitted consent of that nation. > > > > > >> On Dec 20, 12:44 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> >http://cominganarchy.com/2008/12/20/pinned-americas-taiwan-policy-rec... > > > > > >> > >>> Accordingly, the ultimate goal is preventing hostilities—for > > > > >> > >>> as long as possible. That means no independence declaration > > > > >> > >>> and no military invasion. The best way to maintain this is to > > > > >> > >>> speak Victorian! In other words the US must state that it will > > > > >> > >>> honor its defense pledge to Taiwan in the event this small > > > > >> > >>> democratic nation is attacked by an authoritarian communist > > > > >> > >>> power. And it must supply Taiwan with military hardware > > > > >> > >>> accordingly. But it cannot overstate its support and push > > > > >> > >>> Taiwan to "pull a Georgia." The Russian invasion of Georgia > > > > >> > >>> may end up having an impact on the Far East. We must assume > > > > >> > >>> that Taiwan has watched the lukewarm American response to > > > > >> > >>> Russia's invasion with extreme concern, because it shows that > > > > >> > >>> America really isn't willing to protect reckless leaders that > > > > >> > >>> may be considered allies. Hopefully it acts to restrain > > > > >> > >>> Taiwan's urges for declaring independence, and does not > > > > >> > >>> inspire China about the benefits that could be reaped from an > > > > >> > >>> invasion.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > > Mark M. Kahle > > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- > > > > Dölj citerad text - > > > > - Visa citerad text -- Dölj citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
