I have read both the UN and Congressional speeches..... what you are saying is just as he said.... simply NOT true.
On 12/23/08, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > If one listened to Bush's pre War speeches, one WOULD hear a multitude > of reasons given... The argument that the MSM simplified the argument > for some who refused to look into the matter as nuclear WMD is a > circular firing squad that is meant to prevent the obvious fact from > being said --- multiple reasons were given many times before the war > by Bush, Republicans and Democrats... > > I understand it is convenient to remember a one sided POV and MSM spun > Urban Myth to justify one's reasoning... > > On Dec 23, 12:39 pm, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 23, 10:55 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > That was one reason given to remove Saddam... And I grant that that > > > was based on fault intel... As our Intel has been faulty for 30+ > > > years, is that a reason to require 20/20 hindsight to validate ALL > > > reasons given... > > > > The fact of the matter is; is that it was sold to the American public > > as a nuclear threat, where none existed. > > Intel custom tailored to fit the fears of the American people. > > > > I look forward to enjoying you're defense of validation on faulty > > premises > > of many other issues. > > > -- Mark M. Kahle Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
