Obama dismisses Bush Pentagon appointees
 http://thehill.com:80/leading-the-news/obama-dismisses-bush-pentagon-...
Despite keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Pentagon,
President-elect Obama’s transition team informed 90 Bush appointees
their services will not be needed after Inauguration Day.

Scott Gration, a senior official on Obama’s transition team, called
and emailed several of President Bush’s Pentagon appointees about 10
days ago to inform them they were being dismissed.


Those calls and emails were followed up by an email from Jim
O'Beirne,
the special assistant to the secretary of defense for White House
liaisons, who expressed exasperation that Gration informed the
employees directly instead of letting O'Beirne's office know first.


"With regard to the process, I am unable to provide an explanation,"
O'Beirne wrote on Tuesday in the email, which was obtained by The
Hill. "I played no part in it, and I will not speculate why matters
were handled as they were."


A spokesman for the Pentagon said Gates was "absolutely satisfied"
with the way the transition was handled.


Gates "is sensitive to the fact that a number of appointees will not
be able to stay on after [Jan.] 20th," Defense Department spokesman
Geoff Morrell said. He noted Gates did request many appointees stay
on
and the "Obama team was able to cooperate."


But O'Beirne made it clear in the email that in some cases of
dismissal, he thinks the employee's politics played a role in their
being let go.


O'Beirne said that Gates had "sought to keep virtually his entire
team
in place pending the availability of Obama replacements."


Out of roughly 250 political appointees, 90 were dismissed.


"Whatever negotiations occurred in pursuit of that goal, the Gration
notifications evidently reflected the results of those efforts,"
O'Beirne wrote.


Traditionally political appointees resign at the end of a president’s
term, leaving the new commander in chief to put his own team in place
but with Gates staying in the top Pentagon job there was reason to
believe many of his staff would also stay.


The Obama team noted that a majority of the political appointees will
remain in place.


"Given that our nation is at war, we have asked several political
appointees at the Department of Defense to stay in their jobs past
January 20th to help ensure a smooth transition. We are grateful for
the cooperation and professionalism of the men and women at the
Department of Defense in support of our men and women in uniform," an
Obama transition official said.


Bush has repeatedly stated that he wanted to see an orderly
transition
to ensure that the next president would hit the ground running at a
time when the country is fighting two wars and weathering one of the
most significant economic crises in modern times.


Until now, that process seemed to be going smoothly as a number of
departments have reported efficient and even cordial working
relationships between Bush appointees and transition officials. The
O'Beirne email is the first sign of discontent.


In the email, O'Beirne tried to assure the soon-to-be displaced
employees that the decisions were based on "policy change in the
Obama
administration" and not based on performance.


However, he said, if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can
"content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding
performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention
to you."


"In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were
among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.


Other reasons O'Beirne cited for employees' dismissal were "politics,
matter of policy and availability of qualified replacements and the
strength of the permanent career and uniformed staffs."


Morrell, a political appointee who is staying at the Pentagon, noted
that while O'Beirne is usually the liaison for political appointees
Gates chief of staff Robert Rangel has taken over that role. Rangel
is
also staying on.


"Jim has had to defer many of the things he could normally respond
to," Morrell said as a possible explanation for the email.





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to