With Obama, DC Residents Hope for a Voice
Voting act would give delegate full power.
http://www.truthout.org:80/123108VA
Washington - In recent years, residents of this city - the "last
colony," some call it - have resorted to political theater in their
fight for representation in Congress. They dumped tea into the
Potomac
River. They sarcastically petitioned for reunification with Britain.
They produced license plates that proclaimed they lived in a place of
"Taxation Without Representation," which President Bush refused to
put
on his limousine.
But now, after two centuries of complaint, the District of
Columbia may finally be about to get a full-voting representative, if
not two US senators and the ultimate goal of statehood. President-
elect Barack Obama is an original cosponsor of the DC Voting Rights
bill, which would turn the city's congressional delegate, who has
limited power, into a full-fledged member of the US House.
Some are hoping Obama will also back measures eventually leading
to statehood. The issue could be one of the first legislative
initiatives of his presidency, and a test of his commitment to make
life better for the district's 581,000 residents, who on average pay
some of the nation's highest federal income tax bills.
Backers of the legislation say it is a matter of basic democratic
rights and fairness because the lack of representation in the House
and Senate disenfranchises a city where African-Americans make up 56
percent of the population - a point made all the more dramatic with
Obama, the first black person to be elected president, about to move
into the White House.
"You would have thought there were no Americans left without
representation in the people's House by the time you had your first
African-American in the White House," said Eleanor Holmes Norton, the
district's elected delegate to Congress who is allowed to vote in
committee and on some procedural matters, but not on the final
passage
of legislation. "So, if anything, Obama has leaped over history."
Ilir Zherka, executive director of DC Vote, which is funded
partly
by city taxpayers, said he hoped the issue would gain notice as the
nation focuses on Obama's arrival at the White House. "D.C. residents
serve in the armed forces but don't have a vote on whether we go to
war," he said. "On all of the national questions that Congress
addresses, D.C. residents lack the power to shape any of those."
Advocates nearly won approval last year of full voting rights for
D.C.'s delegate. The bill easily passed the House and fell three
votes
short of overcoming a filibuster in the Senate. Obama himself was a
prime sponsor in the Senate. Bush, by contrast, threatened to veto
it.
In an effort to make a deal palatable, backers crafted a
compromise that would give Utah an extra seat in the House, while
putting off the question of giving Washington, D.C., two senators or
granting statehood. The deal was designed to keep the partisan
balance
in the House because a Democrat would almost certainly be elected
from
the nation's capital and a Republican would come from Utah.
But the political equation could unravel. Jason Chaffetz, who
last
month won election to Congress from Utah, said his state shouldn't
get
another House member if it means an extra one would be awarded to
Washington.
"I think it is trying to cut a backroom deal with Utah and I
think
it is wrong," Chaffetz said, arguing that the effort is
unconstitutional. And without any D.C. deal, Utah officials already
expect to get an additional US House seat - from redistricting after
the 2010 census.
Chaffetz said he agrees with backers of D.C. voting rights on the
underlying issue, saying, "Taxation without representation is
fundamentally wrong."
But the Republican said the way to gain that representation would
be for Washington's residents either to win congressional support for
statehood or to try to reunite with Maryland, which once owned the
land on which Washington is situated. (Virginia also gave land for
Washington, but recovered it in the 19th century.) It is considered
highly unlikely such a measure would be supported either in the
District of Columbia or Maryland.
For now, the emphasis is on having a full-voting representative
in
the House. Holmes Norton, who is confident that the larger Democratic
majority in the incoming Congress will pass the measure, has
suggested
that the bill be approved in time for Obama to sign it by Feb. 12,
the
birthday of Abraham Lincoln, his political hero who signed the
Emancipation Proclamation.
But the measure remains controversial, with the main opposition
coming from Republicans who believe it will inevitably lead to a
follow-up bill calling for the district to also get two senators,
which would probably increase Democratic power in the Senate.
Now that it appears the city may get its full-fledged US
representative, the bigger question has become whether Obama would
lead a broader effort for senators or statehood, which even some of
the strongest advocates view as politically unrealistic in the
immediate future.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat and a
leading advocate of broader representation for the city's residents,
said through a spokeswoman that he "supports the idea of D.C.
statehood, but the reality is that the DC Voting Rights Act has the
best chance of passing at this time."
While there have been a number of reports that suggest that Obama
has said he supports statehood, the word is sometimes used in a
general way to indicate support for the more limited voting rights
bill.
An Obama spokesman, asked whether the president-elect supports
statehood, declined to respond directly, instead issuing a statement
that said: "The president-elect is a strong supporter of D.C. voting
rights because he believes that all Americans should have a voice in
our Democratic process."
While Washington, D.C., has more residents than Wyoming, and
nearly as many as Vermont, the city's residents have been denied full
representation in Congress on grounds that such rights were withheld
in the Constitution, which says Congress has the exclusive right to
legislate in the district that holds the national seat of government.
Supporters of voting representation for Washington say that the
Constitution gives Congress the authority to seat a House member from
the district, while opponents vow to take the matter to the US
Supreme
Court if necessary.
The Constitution was amended in 1961 to allow Washington
residents
to vote in presidential elections, and the city was granted home rule
in the 1970s, enabling its citizens to elect a mayor and its
government to make many decisions for itself. But Congress has
regularly tried to step into local matters.
Backers of voting rights for D.C. residents have asked for a
meeting with Obama to discuss his views. Meanwhile, they are hoping
that when he rides in the presidential limousine on the day of his
inauguration, he will approve the use of the license plate that says
"Taxation Without Representation," symbolizing his sympathy with the
cause.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
