As you sow, so you reap. If you vote a Taliban, Hamas, Hizbollahs --> You will get US/israli/ NATO/Indian bombs in your backyard.
Wise people think the consequences before voting Hamas and its likes. Gullible /fools repent after affected, then mend their mistakes. But, sometimes, it cost them their life. 900+ dead. 300 children. We all can feel sorry about this civilian loss. But they have to bear the repercussions of their decision to vote HAMAs. West bank people are OK. - Why ? Let the Muslim/Arab world do some introspection and let the world know - "Why the people of Israel deserve big holes in their house/schools/ buildings ?"; courtesy - Hamas brand rocket ? On Jan 13, 10:51 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > There is only ONE political source worse than the US and thats France > (italy runs a close third). > > To get "any slant or misinformation available" one must first be multi > lingual to understand the explanation of the video ... If not back to > square one for 90%. As to the subject of the post, phosphorous is > hardly illegal, most houses in the middle east have little that burns. > Wood and its by-products are just too expensive. > > On 1/13/09, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> I probably get better video coverage than you. It does not go through > > >>> the US filter. > > > Now this is funny.. All country, including Europe, have there biases > > and blind spots... So with the internet you, or can get in the US, > > any slant of information or misinformation available... Wasn't it the > > fake photos pushed by the French Media which start a round of violence > > some years back... They were taken to court and the court said in > > effect "the French Media lied and sought to defend those lies with > > more lies"... > > > On Jan 12, 10:39 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes doc, I know. I probably get better video coverage than you. It > > > does not go through the US filter. They are dual purpose... they light > > > it up on the way down and keep it lit with bright white smoke when > > > they hit. Standard stuff. It is what you see on all the nigh shots. > > > Scares the bejeezus out of people as well. > > > > Next election maybe they won't vote for a terrorist organization that > > > does not have the common mans interests at heart.... > > > > On 1/12/09, Doc Holliday <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > d Saturday. > > > > > "We went by Israeli artillery units that had white phosphorus rounds > > > > with the fuses in them," Marc Garlasco, a senior military analyst at > > > > Human Rights Watch, told Al Jazeera. > > > > > "Clearly it is [white phosphorus], we can tell by the explosions and > > > > the tendrils that go down [and] the fires that were burning," he said. > > > > > "Today there were massive attacks in Jabaliya when we were there. We > > > > saw that there were numerous fires once the white phosphorus had gone > > > > in." > > > > > 'Obscurant' > > > > > International law permits the use of white phopshorus as an > > > > "obscurant" to cover troop movements and prevent enemies from using > > > > certain guided weapons, but its use is controversial as it can injure > > > > people through painful chemical burns. > > > > > IN DEPTH > > > > > Analysis and features from Gaza and Israel > > > > > Track the war and submit your own reports > > > > > Send us your views and eyewitness videos > > > > > Watch our coverage of the war on Gaza > > > > "Even if they are using it as an obscurant, they are using it in a > > > > very densely populated area," Garlasco said. > > > > > "The problem is it covers such a wide area that when the white > > > > phosphorus wafers come down, over 100 in each artillery shell, they > > > > burn everything they touch and they don't stop burning until they are > > > > done. > > > > > "You are talking about skin damage, potentially homes going on fire, > > > > damage to infrastructure." > > > > > Human Rights Watch said that it believed the use of the chemical in > > > > Gaza violated the requirement under international humanitarian law to > > > > take all feasible precautions to avoid civilian injury and loss of > > > > life. > > > > > The Israeli military has previously denied using white phosphorus > > > > during the 15-day offensive in the Gaza Strip, but has said that any > > > > munitions that it does use comply with international law. > > > > > Israel used white phophorus during its 34-day war against Lebanon's > > > > Hezbollah movement in 2006, while the United States used it during the > > > > controversial siege of the Iraqi city of Fallujah in 2004. > > > > > Peace, > > > > Doc > > > > > On Jan 12, 5:16 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Those phosphorous weapons are flares. Hamas ALSO refused to abide by > > > > > it. > > > > > > Why did you COOOSE to ignore the HAMAS refusal ?? I would like an > > > > > answer. > > > > > > On Jan 12, 3:21 pm, darkangel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Israel refused to abide by Security Council resolution calling for > > > > > > ceasefire and continued killing of Palestinian civilians in the > > > > > > seventeenth day of the war on Gaza, the number of Palestinians > > > > > > killed > > > > > > to more than 910, including 280 children, as well as Israel is using > > > > > > internationally prohibited weapons like phosphorus White > > > > > > >http://electronicintifada.net/v2/humanrightswire.shtml > > > > -- > > > Mark M. Kahle > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me > > -- > Mark M. Kahle > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
