Posters who have BDS should now all be UNEMPLOYED...  Alas, it has not
happened...

On Jan 30, 4:06 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
> So what’s up with the Democrats putting lobbyists in top cabinet
> positions?  Do you simply turn the other way when Democrats are in
> office?  I guess you should revise your tag line to "Republicans AND
> Democrats: All propaganda. No patriotism."  Hmm… I might start using
> that myself.
>
> As I said, you’re interested in trying to score political points, not
> discussing the problem. How is this episode any different than the
> ones that occurred during the Clinton administration?
>
> The simple truth is the FDA, like every other government agency, is
> too big, too ineffective and too corrupt. It’s been this way for a
> very long time. Historical data clearly shows this. To suggest that
> Bush is the cause of something that has been going on long before he
> became President is illogical - but your partisan hypocrisy has been
> duly noted.
>
> On Jan 30, 2:50 pm, Fritz_da_Cat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Is it really? Putting a lobbyist who disregarded regulations and let
> > food producers do whatever the fuck they wanted is what was really
> > dumb and hs endangered our nation's food supply on multiple
> > occasions.
>
> > Republicans: All propaganda. No patriotism.
>
> > On Jan 30, 11:07 am, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Sorry Fritz, but this is just dumb. To put this into perspective I
> > > offer the following *sample* of contaminated food problems that
> > > occurred in just one year during the Clinton administration (not
> > > attacking Clinton, he just happens to have been the president before
> > > Bush);
>
> > > - A parasite, Cyclospora, on raspberries from Guatemala caused over
> > > 1000 consumer illnesses all over the country and in Canada.
> > > - E. coli poisoning outbreaks traced to lettuce caused at least 100
> > > consumer illnesses in three states.
> > > - E. coli and Cryptosporidium poisoning from unpasteurized juice
> > > products, including Odwalla juice, caused over 100 consumer illnesses
> > > and one death in at least 5 states.
> > > - 23 deaths were traced to one bacteria, Vibrio vulnificus, in raw
> > > shellfish.
> > > - Over 70 consumer illnesses from shellfish were traced to raw oysters
> > > from Louisiana. In January 1997, in another major outbreak, over 400
> > > consumers became ill from oysters.
>
> > > Oddly enough, I don't recall that vast right wing conspiracy team ever
> > > blaming Clinton for these problems. The truth of the matter is it's
> > > impossible to police everyone, and these things will happen. It
> > > usually turns out to be careless and indifferent producers who figure
> > > they can take shortcuts and not get caught. Normally they do, until
> > > someone gets hurt.
>
> > > Here's a quote from the same story, which was written in June 1997,
> > > right in the middle of Clinton's presidency;
>
> > > "Last year, there was a bumper crop of food borne illnesses from FDA-
> > > regulated foods," said Caroline Smith DeWaal, director of food safety
> > > at the CSPI. "Years of inadequate funding have left FDA with a food
> > > safety program that is little more than a recall agency for
> > > contaminated foods."
>
> > > From a May 1997 report titled; "Scrambled Eggs: How a broken food
> > > safety system let contaminated eggs become a national food poisoning
> > > epidemic"  (http://www.cspinet.org/reports/eggs.html)
>
> > > "The history of the federal government's failure to curb the
> > > [Salmonella] epidemic illustrates the ineffectiveness of having
> > > multiple government agencies responsible for regulating the same food.
> > > The agencies were further hamstrung by a Congress that cut funding for
> > > a pilot control program just as it was beginning to show results and
> > > an industry that, except for producers in Pennsylvania, resisted
> > > attempts to prevent egg contamination on the farm."
>
> > > This problem has existed for a loooong time. It's just a shame there
> > > are still disingenuous people more interested in scoring political
> > > points than addressing the problem.
>
> > > On Jan 30, 12:36 pm, Fritz_da_Cat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/us/29Peanut.html?_r=1&8au&emc=au
>
> > > > Bush didn't protect us. He poisoned us.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to