Palin is in office! She is a Governor. Ashley Judd is an idiot if you care to take up that topic.// This woman is running for celebrity/ publicity/therapy for her lonliness/depression, etc. It's child abuse carried to a new level of creativity in my opinion to balance the teeter-totter of multiple abortions used as birth control.
On Feb 6, 7:02�am, "liberal mike532 !" <[email protected]> wrote: > palin as running for office this women isn't > > On Feb 6, 7:09�am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Is she getting different treatment than Sarah Palin and her daughter? > > I think so. > > > On Feb 6, 5:01 am, "liberal mike532 �!" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > yes and it is coming from you travis ! > > > > On Feb 6, 5:40 am, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > She draws disability for a back injury yet she is strong enough to carry > > > > babies? there is some BS here somewhere. > > > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:35 AM, liberal mike532 ! > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > travis you have shown yourself to be a lying piece of scum ! no where > > > > > has it even been hinted at that this women cheated anyone out of > > > > > 165,000 in welfare payments . > > > > > [ Suleman, who now has 14 children, told doctors she battled with > > > > > depression for years after she was injured in a riot in 1999 at the > > > > > state mental hospital where she worked. > > > > > > The doctors' reports were included in more than 300 pages of documents > > > > > released to The Associated Press by the state Division of Workers' > > > > > Compensation on the same day NBC released excerpts of Suleman's first > > > > > interview since giving birth last month. Among other things, the > > > > > documents reveal that Suleman collected more than $165,000 in > > > > > disability payments between 2002 and 2008 for an injury she said left > > > > > her in near-constant pain and helped end her marriage.] > > > > > i am getting really tired of your racists remarks and attacks ! WNCS > > > > > is there a board rule against using a slanderous title to a thread ? > > > > > if there is could you please make a ruling on this one ? > > > > > > On Feb 5, 11:09 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > From: Travis > > > > > > Date: 2009/2/5 > > > > > > Subject: Records: Octuplets ho mom cheated govt for $165,000 in > > > > > > welfare > > > > > > >http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,488627,00.html > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *~@):~{> > > > > > -- > > > > *~@):~{>- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
