why did al qaeda go to Iraq? Because the war we intiated left
a power vaccuum and ample oppurtunities to kill Americans.

If not for the war, there would not have been al qaeda.

On Feb 23, 4:26 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bush won the then central front in Iraq...  The Central front has
> moved back to the Afghani-Paki border --AS IT HAD TO DO...  AQ went to
> Iraq and made it the central front and LOST...   Now it returned back
> to the tribal areas of Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan where government
> rarely existed for the last 500 years...
>
> On Feb 22, 1:20 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Lew,
>
> > First didn't "Bushs' War" include Afghanistan ?? Robert Gates who was
> > Bushs' SecDef says there is NO way to win....
>
> > Second I would like a reliable/cerdible source quote to add any
> > credence that Obama or any one else for that matter is in favor of any
> > serviceman or woman being killed or an admission that is solely YOUR
> > opinion.
>
> > Third I was under the impression that this was a "war on terror". Your
> > claim is is to insinuate and flat out state that there are no more
> > terrorists.... please explain your statement in connection with the
> > Bush claim (and only claim) throughout that this is a "war on terror".
>
> > Last if the war was "won" I would like a date/link for that formal
> > expression and an explanation in explicit and coherent terms the need
> > for continued US occupation.
>
> > Failing in your ability to do the above a simple statement covering
> > your bias and lack of situational grasp will suffice.
>
> > On Feb 22, 11:52 am, lew <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Republicans haven't reached the point of Democrat desperation a couple
> > > of years ago when DEMOCRATS cheered each WOUNDED  and each DEAD
> > > military report as a victory to defeat the hated George W. Bush.
>
> > > Republicans can NEVER stoop so low as to promote a losing strategy
> > > (Vote against the Surge) just to attain more Ameican woundings and
> > > deaths to gain politically.
>
> > > Our own presidemt, Barack Obama, voted against the surge because he
> > > knew that could/would lead to more woundings and deaths.
>
> > > BUSH WON IN IRAQ.   Democrats lovingly referred to Iraq as "Bush's
> > > War."
>
> > > BUSH WON BUSH'S WAR.
>
> > > On Feb 22, 6:53 am, VT Sean Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Why do Republicans Desperately need President Obama
> > > > and the Democrat controlled Congress to fail?
>
> > > > Sean Lewis
> > > > February 22, 2009
>
> > > > President Obama has been President for barely
> > > > a month.
>
> > > > He is facing a Crisis equal if not greater that the
> > > > Crisis Bush faced after 9/11.
>
> > > > After 9/11 the country unified behind President Bush
> > > > and gave him almost unanimous support to deal
> > > > with the crisis. It was about country first, not party.
>
> > > > Yet even BEFORE President Obama took office
> > > > Republicans, their surrogates and the press have
> > > > ridiculed and second guessed EVERYTHING
> > > > President Obama has done.
>
> > > > President Obama has asked for input from all corners because
> > > > he NEEDS the help of ALL AMERICANS to deal with
> > > > this crisis the same way ALL AMERICANS rallied behind
> > > > President Bush on 9/11.
>
> > > > Republicans instead of offering their advice and then understanding
> > > > that they DO NOT HAVE THE FINAL SAY on what Obama
> > > > decides and backing him in a unified effort to deal with the
> > > > economic problems are instead ridiculing every decision and
> > > > proclaiming failure before the ink is even dry on the BILLS leaving
> > > > Committees!
>
> > > > The Country is facing multiple crisis of which any one could
> > > > create disaster for America and Americans. Yet the Republicans
> > > > seem hell bent on being obstructionists, and adding to the chaos.
>
> > > > Why?
>
> > > > Because the simple fact is that if Obama and the Democratic
> > > > lead Congress fixes the many problems left behind by the
> > > > Republican controlled Congress and Republican Administration
> > > > it will CONFIRM and VALIDATE that the Republicans were
> > > > irresponsible and incompetent during the years they had Majority
> > > > Control in the Government.
>
> > > > Republicans are not thinking about the Country or American
> > > > people first, they are thinking about the REPUBLICAN party
> > > > first!
>
> > > > The American people said 'we want change' and that change was
> > > > to let the Democrats run things. That Republicans no longer get
> > > > to demand it is 'their way or the highway', yet this is
> > > > still how they are governing.
>
> > > > The Republicans use the guise of they are the Minority party
> > > > and their job is to oppose the Democrats. The problem is the
> > > > Country is on the brink of a monumental collapse and this is
> > > > a time for cooperation, NOT opposition. So why do it?
>
> > > > Because for the Republican Party to be of consequence again
> > > > in the future, the Republican party needs the President and the
> > > > Democratic controlled Congress to fail. If the Democrats do fail,
> > > > then the Republicans can say " see this wasn't our fault NO ONE
> > > > could have prevented this from happening.
>
> > > > However if President Obama and the Democratically controlled Congress
> > > > succeeds, it only emphasises that not only did the Republicans not
> > > > acknowledge the crisis as they arose but even after they finally
> > > > admitted the problem they did nothing to remedy the problem either
> > > > through
> > > > ignorance or incompetence.
>
> > > > So do not be fooled by the insincere arguments that Republicans
> > > > are trying to be bipartisan and want to help. They have an agenda,
> > > > and that agenda is for the failure of the Democrats, even if it
> > > > destroys the Country in the process.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to