Obama's budget FOUR TIMES THE DEFICITS OF BUSH

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-233039

Obama budget could bring $9.3 trillion in deficits
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090320/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_budget

 U.S. Budget Deficit Forecast to Hit $1.8 Trillion This Year The
Congressional Budget Office says the deficit under President Obama's
policies would never go below 4 percent of the size of the economy, figures
that economists agree are unsustainable.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/20/budget-deficit-forecast-hit-trillion-year/




On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> Keith you want to give some figures for this
> outrageous comment? 4 times the size of
> of all eight years of the Bush Administration budgets?
>
> That would make it $20 Trillion!
>
> On Apr 16, 5:17 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The "record deficit" that you reference, is a small drop in the bucket as
> > compared to the current "record deficit" which is four times the size of
> all
> > eight years of the Bush Administration's budgets.....
> >
> > You still don't get it!!!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>  >
> >
> >
> > > OK, lets remember what this post is about,
> > > It is not about the insults or the nickname you
> > > are trying to give me, LMAO.
> >
> > > It is not about the FUBAR called Bush trickle
> > > down economics.
> >
> > > It is about the fact that Bush inherited an annual
> > > Budget Surplus, turned this surplus into a record deficit
> > > and doubled the National Debt while robbing working class
> > > Americans future Social Security benefits in the greatest transfer of
> > > wealth
> > > in history through the Bush Tax cuts that bought the 2004
> > > election and gutted the future of America and destroyed the
> > > Bush Republicans as was shown by the 2006 and 2008 election results
> > > and the subsequent economic collapse that resulted in the
> > > multiple Bailouts begun in the fall of 2008 to keep
> > > the country from experiencing another Economic collapse of 1929,
> > > and the GOP's effort to remain in power by hi-jacking yet
> > > another grass roots movement like they did with the
> > > Religious Right.
> >
> > > The Teabaggers are the new grass roots movement
> > > to be plundered by the GOP.
> >
> > > On Apr 16, 4:43 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hey SugarShack!!
> >
> > > > All folks named "Sean" or "Shawn" have a nickname of "SugarShack"
>  Just
> > > ask
> > > > former Buccaneer QB Shawn "SugarShack" King, or former Buccaneer RB
> > > Reggie
> > > > Sean "SugarShack" Cobb.
> >
> > > > I was opposed to the bailouts, and believed them to be a mistake.
>  The
> > > only
> > > > way for market corrections if for the market to correct itself, not
> by
> > > > government bailouts. They have never worked, and this is once again a
> > > part
> > > > of failed Kenysian economics that don't work!!
> >
> > > > Do we once again want to revisit how we got to this financial
> quagmire
> > > > Sean?  Do we want to once again play the "Blame Game" and point out
> who
> > > is
> > > > responsible for this economic quagmire??  It wasn't George Bush or
> the
> > > Bush
> > > > Administration!!
> >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > LMAO, as you see the argument slipping away, the insults begin.
> >
> > > > > Once again Obama INHERITED these Bail outs
> > > > > he did not create them.. try again.
> >
> > > > > The AIG Bailout began in 2008
> > > > > The Auto Bailout Began in 2008
> > > > > The TARP Bailout began in 2008
> > > > > The Merrill Lynch Bailout Began in 2008
> > > > > The majority of the additional spending was already
> > > > > COMMITTED before Obama took office.
> >
> > > > > On Apr 16, 4:06 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Hey SugarShack:
> >
> > > > > > Here ya go:
> >
> > > > > >http://www.federalbudget.com/
> >
> > > > > > This is all Obama's.....
> >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:53 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Really?
> >
> > > > > > > The AIG Bailout began in 2008
> > > > > > > The Auto Bailout Began in 2008
> > > > > > > The TARP Bailout began in 2008
> > > > > > > The Merrill Lynch Bailout Began in 2008
> > > > > > > The majority of the additional spending was already
> > > > > > > COMMITTED before Obama took office.
> >
> > > > > > > You want to try again with this erroneous statement
> > > > > > > or better yet you want to supply FACTS proving this statement?
> >
> > > > > > > On Apr 16, 3:31 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Except for the current Administration who within less than 90
> > > days,
> > > > > has
> > > > > > > > expanded the federal bureauacracy ten fold, and increased the
> > > size of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > budget larger than all budgets combined in our entire 230
> year
> > > > > history.
> > > > > > > > President Obama makes George Bush look like a fiscal
> > > conservative,
> > > > > and we
> > > > > > > > all know that he wasn't.   The point being, is that your
> > > comparison
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > moot.   America made a mistake, and it is time to limit the
> > > damage
> > > > > now
> > > > > > > > Sean!!!
> >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Sounds great but we all have seen what REALLY happens when
> > > > > Republicans
> > > > > > > > > have no one to challenge their fiscal actions or policies.
> They
> > > > > > > > > doubled the Debt
> > > > > > > > > took a budget surplus and turned it into a record deficit
> and
> > > grew
> > > > > > > > > government
> > > > > > > > > faster than any other Administration in history.
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 3:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > What point does this make?  That Clinton was a Tax &
> Spend
> > > > > Democrat,
> > > > > > > > > wherein
> > > > > > > > > > a Republican Congress and their "Contract With America"
> held
> > > his
> > > > > feet
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > fire?
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Nothing in this audio report disputes the facts that I
> > > submitted
> > > > > > > earlier.
> > > > > > > > > > You have Newt Gingrich, and a Republican controlled
> Congress
> > > that
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > responsible for a budgetary surplus, period.   Clinton
> had
> > > > > literally
> > > > > > > > > nothing
> > > > > > > > > > to do with the surplus, and if it were not for a
> Republican
> > > > > > > controlled
> > > > > > > > > > fiscally conservative Congress, who Clinton successfully
> > > fought
> > > > > over
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > vetoed their balanced budget Amendments, we would have
> had
> > > > > deficit
> > > > > > > > > > spending!!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 3:08 PM, VT VirtualTruth
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will let the actual news reports of November 11, 1995
> > > > > > > > > > > make my point.
> >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6KRnWkh45U&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcrooksan.
> > > > > > > > > ..
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Clinton invested in the future US economy and the
> result
> > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > robust GDP growth that grew the economy out of
> deficits.
> > > > > > > > > > > Republicans consider this incorrectly as wasted money.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Bush decided to give the surplus away as tax cuts to
> > > > > > > > > > > the rich with the ridiculous idea that the money would
> > > > > > > > > > > bleed down to others. The result was Bush starved the
> > > > > > > > > > > country of much needed future investments.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Obama now must maintain the normal amout of forward
> > > > > > > > > > > investment in the country's future AND make up for the
> > > > > > > > > > > 8 years Bush starved the economy of stimulus investment
> > > > > > > > > > > capital.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 2:01 pm, Keith In Tampa <
> [email protected]
> >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >  > Hello Sean!!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Good to see ya!!
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for sharing your homoerotic far left
> extremist
> > > > > talking
> > > > > > > > > points
> > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > the group!  I know that members such as Fritzie,
> Biffie,
> > > > > Cosmo-ie
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > > > > > far left extremists are proud of you for picking up
> on
> > > and
> > > > > > > mimicking
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > likes of that gal who is the husband and splashes
> diesel
> > > > > behind
> > > > > > > her
> > > > > > > > > ears
> > > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > perfume....Whuz-Her-Name....Rachael Maddow, and the
> other
> > > > > crazed,
> > > > > > > > > > > demented
> > > > > > > > > > > > Moonbat, Keithie Olberman, but I digress.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Let's review your premise, and I quote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > "That the Republican Congress was NOT the reason for
> this
> > > > > > > balanced
> > > > > > > > > > > > budget (during
> > > > > > > > > > > > the Clinton Administration). That Clinton stood up to
> the
> > > > > Rhino's
> > > > > > > > > (Rhino
> > > > > > > > > > > > being a derogatory term for Republican)"
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > =====
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sean, let us actually review the facts, and not
> > > revisionist
> > > > > > > history.
> > > > > > > > >  Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > course, all of the data I have attached here can be
> > > > > documented.
> > > > > > > > >  Please
> > > > > > > > > > > feel
> > > > > > > > > > > > free to ask questions if there is anything that you
> get
> > > > > confused
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > frustrated over not comprehending:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It is true, that the federal budget deficit  tumbled
> from
> > > > > $255
> > > > > > > > > billion in
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1993 to approximately  $117 billion in 1996, and that
> by
> > > > > 1999,
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > actual surplus versus a deficit in our national
> budget.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In February 1993 President Clinton announced his new
> > > > > > > Administration's
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > economic program: a $16-billion "fiscal stimulus."
> The
> > > > > spending
> > > > > > > > > package
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > later abandoned by the Democratic Congress as too
> > > fiscally
> > > > > > > > > irresponsible.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > >  In February 1993 President Clinton wins passage of
> his
> > > > > > > $250-billion
> > > > > > > > > tax
> > > > > > > > > > > > hike; which New York Senator Pat Moynihan accurately
> > > > > describes as
> > > > > > > > > "the
> > > > > > > > > > > > largest tax increase in world history."
> >
> > > > >
> http://www.archive.org/stream/proposedconstitu00unit/proposedconstitu.
> > > > > > > ..
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Nevertheless, President Clinton's "Tax and Spend"
> policy
> > > > > passes
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Democrat
> > > > > > > > > > > > Controlled
> >
>  > ...
> >
> > read more ยป
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to