Keith the rest of the world and most of America disagrees with you. On Apr 23, 10:20 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Waterboarding as it was applied to THE THREE HOMICIDAL MURDERERS THAT WERE > ATTEMPTING TO KILL YOU was not specifically against any international law or > treatise that the United States was a signatory. > > Waterboarding as we applied it, was not torture! > > MoonbatMyths!!!! > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:26 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 10:21 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think a better way of framing your question Studio, is, "That if the > > > enhanced interrogation technique of waterboarding is 'torture', then how > > > does one survive the procedure after 183 times?" > > > I don't know, let's try it on you to make sure. > > > The fact is the US was a International signatory against torture, > > which also > > includes water boarding. > > It was and is against the law, period. > > > It's really nice how you conservative moralists love telling everyone > > how > > moral and effective torture is. > > > INTERROGATOR: > > Have you been ripping the American people off for the last eight > > years? > > > BUSH - CHENEY: > > No, we were protecting... > > > INTERROGATOR: > > Fill 'em up boys, they'll tell us what we want to hear even if it > > takes 183 times. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
