dick, Funny, the article says the bill was INTRODUCED. Said nothing at all about it being passed by Congress and signed into actual law by the President. A typo on your part I'm sure. US laws subject to UN control? Bull-fucking-shit. Show me where such a law was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.
BTW, I would be very much against such a law and will e-mail my Congressman and Senators advising them to NOT vote for it. On May 1, 10:35 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > Subject:More on HR45 > > Anti-Mullah <http://noiri.blogspot.com/> > > OBAMA SIGNS BILLS AND CREATES NEW LAWS DISARMING AMERICANS NATIONWIDE > AND SUBMITS USA LAWS TO UNITED NATIONS CONTROL > <http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-signs-bills-and-creates-new-l...> > > Posted: 30 Apr 2009 11:40 AM PDT > > *OBA-HUSSEIN-KHOMEINI, making sure that he makes the Constitutional > right to bear arms by new legislation totally impossible, > > H E R E- I T- C O M E S !!! - HR45 Gun Licensing Bill > HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009 > > ... this is "Obama's Gun Control by Secrecy". * > ** > *Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into > the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act > of 2009.* > ** > *We heard this yesterday on the Peter Boyles radio program.* > ** > *_/Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because it is flying > under the radar/_.* > ** > *To find out about this go to any government website and type in HR 45 > or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of > 2009. You will get all the information. * > ** > *Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with > a clip or ANY pistol unless: It is registered.* > ** > *You are fingerprinted.* > ** > *You supply a current Driver's License.* > ** > *You supply your Social Security #.* > ** > *You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their > choosing.* > ** > *Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must > be reported and costs $25. * > ** > *Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and > are subject up to a year in jail.* > ** > *There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a > child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child > under 18. * > ** > *The Government would have the right to come and inspect that you are > storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is > punishable for up to 5 years in prison. * > ** > *The gun owner's license would expire in 5 years and would _not_ > automatically renew.* > ** > *If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of > many options to read this ...* > ** > *http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/textItis lengthy. * > ** > *But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word along.* > ** > *FAILURE TO DO SO AT YOUR PERIL!* > ** > *This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and > disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a > little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone > realizes it. * > ** > *It's another example of the slowly-boiled frog: put a frog in a pan of > water and slowly heat it; the frog will be boiled to death without > realizing it. This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not. The > Second Amendment: America's original homeland security.* > ** > *You may phone the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A > switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office > you request. > * > > ** > > *ALSO* > > /Just received this from a friend. Haven't heard anything about this > from the NRA, etc: > / > /I don't know if you are aware of this but Obama signed the treaty on > guncontrol with the UN...everyone must start now contacting their > Senators to tell them not to ratify this treaty./ > > http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin507.htmhttp://gunowners.o... > > Please pass this on to everyone you know so that they may start > contactingtheir Senators > > Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading > > -- Even BB guns could be on the chopping block > > Tuesday, April 21, 2009 > > Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who "wasn't going to take away > our guns"? Well, guess what? > > Less than 100 days into his administration, he's never met a gun he > didn't hate. > > A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and > bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn't have the > political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that > didn't keep him from pushing /_additional restrictions_/ on American gun > owners. > > It's called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing > of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other > Related Materials. > > To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really nasty piece of work. > > First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the "illicit" manufacture > of firearms, what does that mean? > > 1. "Illicit manufacturing" of firearms is defined as "assembly of > firearms [or] ammunition ... without a license...." Hence, reloading > ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit -- is > clearly "illicit manufacturing." > > Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be "illicit manufacturing." > And, _while it would be a_ _stretch_, _/assembling a firearm after > cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the > screwy definition of "illicit manufacturing." /_ > > 2. "Firearm" has a similarly questionable definition. "[A]ny other > weapon" is a "firearm," according to the treaty -- and the term "weapon" > is nowhere defined. > > So, is a BB gun a "firearm"? Probably. A toy gun? Possibly. A pistol > grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else. > > If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama > administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of > the other provisions in the treaty: > > * Banning reloading. > > /BANNING SALE OF BRASS, ALREADY FIRED, CARTRIDGES BY THE MILITARY TO THE > PRIVATE SECTOR IS IN PROCESS AND HAS BEEN LURCHED BACK AND FORTH AND WAS > PREVENTED FROM TAKING EFFECT BUT NOW SEEMS TO HAVE COME BACK TO LIFE./ > > In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to adopting "necessary > legislative or other measures" to criminalize illicit manufacturing and > trafficking in firearms. Remember that "illicit manufacturing" includes > reloading and modifying or assembling a firearm in any way. > > This would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate > regulations banning reloading on the basis of this treaty -- just as it > is currently circumventing Congress to write legislation taxing > greenhouse gases. > > * Banning gun clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized > acts should include "association or conspiracy" in connection with said > offenses -- which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by > regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun > clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership. > > * /_Extraditing US gun dealers_/. Article V requires each party to > "adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction > over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention" > under a variety of circumstances. > > We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its > streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico to > define offenses "committed in its territory" in a very broad way. And we > know that we have an _extradition obligation under Article XIX of the > proposed treaty. _ > > So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty to demand to > extradition of American gun dealers. Under Article XXIX, if Mexico > demands the extradition of a lawful American gun dealer, the U.S. would > be required to resolve the dispute through "other means of peaceful > settlement." > > Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on > the proposition that the Obama administration would apply this provision > in a pro-gun manner? > > * Microstamping. > > Article VI requires "appropriate markings" on firearms. And, it is not > inconceivable that this provision could be used to require microstamping > of firearms and/or ammunition -- a requirement which is clearly > /_intended to impose specifications which are not technologically > possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost. _/ > > * Gun registration. > > Article XI requires the maintenance of any records, for a "reasonable > time," that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. > This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer > and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database. > > ACTION: Write your Senators and urge them to oppose the Inter-American > Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, > Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials. > > Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center > <http://gunowners.org/activism.htm> to send your Senators the > pre-written e-mail message below. > > ----- Pre-written letter ----- > > Dear Senator: > > I am urging you, in the strongest terms, to oppose the Inter-American > Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, > Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.This anti-gun treaty > was written by international bureaucrats who are either stupid or > virulently anti-gun -- or both. > > This treaty could very well ban the ability to reload ammunition, to put > new stocks on rifles lawfully owned by American citizens, and, possibly, > even ban BB guns! (Air Guns) > > There are too many problems with this treaty to mention them all in this > letter. The rest can be read on the website of Gun Owners of America at: > > http://gunowners.org/fs0901.htm > > Please do not tell me the treaty has not yet been abused in this way by > the bevy of Third World countries which have signed it. We do not expect > the real ramifications of the treaty to become clear until the big prize > -- the U.S. -- has stepped into the trap. > > For all of these reasons, I must insist that you oppose ratification of > the treaty. Sincerely, > > MEANWHILE ....... > > Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , > Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the > Presidential election: > > · Number of States won by: Democrats:19 Republicans: 29 > > · Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000 > > · Population of counties won by: Democrats:127 million Republicans: 143 > million > > · Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 > Republicans: 2.1 > > Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican > won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. > > Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in > government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government > welfare..." > > Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the > "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of > democracy, with some /_forty percent of the nation's population already > having reached the "governmental dependency" phase_/. > > If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal > invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the > USA in fewer than five years. > > If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. > > If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how > much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom. > > /_AMERICA! WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? ARE YOU STILL SO BLIND? WAKE UP!_/ > /__/ > /_AND REMEMBER AMERICANS, WITH THE OBAMA HOUSE TAKING OVER THE NATIONAL > CENSUS AND ALREADY SENDING OUT OPERATIVES ALL OVER TO COLLECT GPS > LOCATIONS OF YOUR FRONT AND BACK DOORS, -----T H E Y -- K N O W -- W H E > R E -- Y O U -- L I VE -- T O -- COME AND GET YOU!!!_/ > > <$BlogFeedsVertical$> > > <http://feeds2.feedburner.com/%7Eff/Anti-mullah?a=zn9BWVBEkLs:NNowTWxq...> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
