dick,

You post certainly gives no evidence of that.

On May 1, 12:28 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Probably a whole lot better than you do.
>
>
>
> VT VirtualTruth wrote:
> > LMAO....
>
> > Then what does this mean in your mind?
>
> > OBAMA SIGNS BILLS AND CREATES NEW LAWS DISARMING AMERICANS NATIONWIDE
> > AND SUBMITS USA LAWS TO UNITED NATIONS CONTROL
>
> > Do you KNOW how bills become law?
>
> > On May 1, 12:44 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Did not have anything to do with its being passed.  I don't want it
> >> passed.  I merely said I don't like the sounds of this one and if it is
> >> introduced there is at least some chance it might be passed.  Got my
> >> dislike in early on the subject.
> >> Do you
> >> Hollywood wrote:
>
> >>> dick,
>
> >>> Funny, the article says the bill was INTRODUCED. Said nothing at all
> >>> about it being passed by Congress and signed into actual law by the
> >>> President. A typo on your part I'm sure.
> >>> US laws subject to UN control? Bull-fucking-shit. Show me where such a
> >>> law was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.
>
> >>> BTW, I would be very much against such a law and will e-mail my
> >>> Congressman and Senators advising them to NOT vote for it.
>
> >>> On May 1, 10:35 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Subject:More on HR45
>
> >>>>   Anti-Mullah <http://noiri.blogspot.com/>
>
> >>>> OBAMA SIGNS BILLS AND CREATES NEW LAWS DISARMING AMERICANS NATIONWIDE
> >>>> AND SUBMITS USA LAWS TO UNITED NATIONS CONTROL
> >>>> <http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-signs-bills-and-creates-new-l...>
>
> >>>> Posted: 30 Apr 2009 11:40 AM PDT
>
> >>>> *OBA-HUSSEIN-KHOMEINI, making sure that he makes the Constitutional
> >>>> right to bear arms by new legislation totally impossible,
>
> >>>> H E R E- I T- C O M E S !!! - HR45 Gun Licensing Bill
> >>>> HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of 2009
>
> >>>> ... this is "Obama's Gun Control by Secrecy". *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *Very Important for you to be aware of a new bill HR 45 introduced into
> >>>> the House. This is the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sale Act
> >>>> of 2009.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *We heard this yesterday on the Peter Boyles radio program.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *_/Even gun shop owners didn't know about this because it is flying
> >>>> under the radar/_.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *To find out about this go to any government website and type in HR 45
> >>>> or Google HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing & Record of Sales Act of
> >>>> 2009. You will get all the information. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm - any rifle with
> >>>> a clip or ANY pistol unless: It is registered.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *You are fingerprinted.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *You supply a current Driver's License.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *You supply your Social Security #.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their
> >>>> choosing.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *Each update - change or ownership through private or public sale must
> >>>> be reported and costs $25. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and
> >>>> are subject up to a year in jail.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a
> >>>> child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child
> >>>> under 18. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *The Government would have the right to come and inspect that you are
> >>>> storing your gun safely away from accessibility to children and fine is
> >>>> punishable for up to 5 years in prison. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *The gun owner's license would expire in 5 years and would _not_
> >>>> automatically renew.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *If you think this is a joke - go to the website and take your pick of
> >>>> many options to read this ...*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/textItislengthy. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *But, more and more people are becoming aware of this. Pass the word 
> >>>> along.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *FAILURE TO DO SO AT YOUR PERIL!*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *This is just a "termite" approach to complete confiscation of guns and
> >>>> disarming of our society to the point we have no defense - chip away a
> >>>> little here and there until the goal is accomplished before anyone
> >>>> realizes it. *
> >>>> **
> >>>> *It's another example of the slowly-boiled frog: put a frog in a pan of
> >>>> water and slowly heat it; the frog will be boiled to death without
> >>>> realizing it. This is one to act on whether you own a gun or not. The
> >>>> Second Amendment: America's original homeland security.*
> >>>> **
> >>>> *You may phone the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121. A
> >>>> switchboard operator will connect you directly with the Senate office
> >>>> you request.
> >>>> *
>
> >>>> **
>
> >>>> *ALSO*
>
> >>>> /Just received this from a friend. Haven't heard anything about this
> >>>> from the NRA, etc:
> >>>> /
> >>>> /I don't know if you are aware of this but Obama signed the treaty on
> >>>> guncontrol with the UN...everyone must start now contacting their
> >>>> Senators to tell them not to ratify this treaty./
>
> >>>>http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin507.htmhttp://gunowners.o...
>
> >>>> Please pass this on to everyone you know so that they may start
> >>>> contactingtheir Senators
>
> >>>> Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading
>
> >>>> -- Even BB guns could be on the chopping block
>
> >>>> Tuesday, April 21, 2009
>
> >>>> Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who "wasn't going to take away
> >>>> our guns"? Well, guess what?
>
> >>>> Less than 100 days into his administration, he's never met a gun he
> >>>> didn't hate.
>
> >>>> A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and
> >>>> bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn't have the
> >>>> political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that
> >>>> didn't keep him from pushing /_additional restrictions_/ on American gun
> >>>> owners.
>
> >>>> It's called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing
> >>>> of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other
> >>>> Related Materials.
>
> >>>> To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really nasty piece of work.
>
> >>>> First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the "illicit" manufacture
> >>>> of firearms, what does that mean?
>
> >>>> 1. "Illicit manufacturing" of firearms is defined as "assembly of
> >>>> firearms [or] ammunition ... without a license...." Hence, reloading
> >>>> ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit -- is
> >>>> clearly "illicit manufacturing."
>
> >>>> Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be "illicit manufacturing."
> >>>> And, _while it would be a_ _stretch_, _/assembling a firearm after
> >>>> cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the
> >>>> screwy definition of "illicit manufacturing." /_
>
> >>>> 2. "Firearm" has a similarly questionable definition. "[A]ny other
> >>>> weapon" is a "firearm," according to the treaty -- and the term "weapon"
> >>>> is nowhere defined.
>
> >>>> So, is a BB gun a "firearm"? Probably. A toy gun? Possibly. A pistol
> >>>> grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else.
>
> >>>> If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama
> >>>> administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of
> >>>> the other provisions in the treaty:
>
> >>>> * Banning reloading.
>
> >>>> /BANNING SALE OF BRASS, ALREADY FIRED, CARTRIDGES BY THE MILITARY TO THE
> >>>> PRIVATE SECTOR IS IN PROCESS AND HAS BEEN LURCHED BACK AND FORTH AND WAS
> >>>> PREVENTED FROM TAKING EFFECT BUT NOW SEEMS TO HAVE COME BACK TO LIFE./
>
> >>>> In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to adopting "necessary
> >>>> legislative or other measures" to criminalize illicit manufacturing and
> >>>> trafficking in firearms. Remember that "illicit manufacturing" includes
> >>>> reloading and modifying or assembling a firearm in any way.
>
> >>>> This would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate
> >>>> regulations banning reloading on the basis of this treaty -- just as it
> >>>> is currently circumventing Congress to write legislation taxing
> >>>> greenhouse gases.
>
> >>>> * Banning gun clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized
> >>>> acts should include "association or conspiracy" in connection with said
> >>>> offenses -- which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by
> >>>> regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun
> >>>> clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.
>
> >>>> * /_Extraditing US gun dealers_/. Article V requires each party to
> >>>> "adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction
> >>>> over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention"
> >>>> under a variety of circumstances.
>
> >>>> We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its
> >>>> streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico to
> >>>> define offenses "committed in its territory" in a very broad way. And we
> >>>> know that we have an _extradition obligation under Article XIX of the
> >>>> proposed treaty. _
>
> >>>> So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty to demand to
> >>>> extradition of American gun dealers. Under Article XXIX, if Mexico
> >>>> demands the extradition of a lawful American gun dealer, the U.S. would
> >>>> be required to resolve the dispute through "other means of peaceful
> >>>> settlement."
>
> >>>> Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on
> >>>> the
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to