Studio, Studio, Studio, In my adult life, of which I have been politically active, I have seen predicted, and witnessed folks like you profess the demise of the Republican Party at least three times. When I was just able to vote, shortly after the Nixon/Watergate era, (and which was the first and only time I ever voted for a Democrat Presidential candidate) folks like you were predicting that the demise of the Republican Party was imminent, that it was a "Brand New Day, A Brand New World". After four years of Jimmy Carter, our Nation overwhelmingly elected Ronald Reagan, the greatest American President in yours and my lifetime, (Despite what my most esteemed moderator "The Annointed One" believes!!! LOL!!!)
Then, after "A thousand Points of Light" and the mediocrity of George Herbert Walker Bush and his wife who remarkably resembled George Washington, the Nation went into "Clinton-Mania". After two years of "I feel your pain" and folks like you once again professing that "The Republican Party Is Toast"; it wasn't two years later, that the Republicans gained control of both the Senate and the House, as well as most all State legislatures and local elected offices. I will concede, as I have previously, that the Republicans are a House in disarray right now. That we lost our way, with a number of individuals who infiltrated our Party who are not conservatives, and who were for the most part, big spending egalitarians who hurt our Nation. Having said that, what has happened on your side of the aisle, (and Sean "Sugarshack" VT's) is far more sinister. Americans are catching on to the whole concept of "Change We Can Believe In", the tea parties were just a taste. In eighteen months, the House will once again be controlled by thinking Americans. Your socialist party os over my friend! Enjoy it while you can!!! On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:17 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 2, 2:22 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Studio!! > > > > Well, first, if we were going to get into political parties and, > "racism", > > you clearly identified the wrong party. I am unaware of any policy or any > > plank of the Republican National Comittee that could even remotely be > > construed as "racist"; albeit I know that a lot of "clueless" individuals > > would somehow attempt to frame or promote such platforms as racist. > > First off, the thread was started by Travis, not a political party, > but one in > which he clearly supports calling the President a "Muzzie", which he > is clearly not. > > Second, you must not think your party is very smart not to have > included policy > which would obviously shrink their ranks even further than it is now. > > Third, there is no such stated policy in the Democrat platform > either, > so by your logic, would nullify all that you just stated. > > > What was it you were saying about Republicans being, "racist"? Do you > care > > to revise this position Studio?? > > No I don't, they are. > But it's not a stated policy, rather a understated "soft racism" with > a nod and a wink. > Both parties have it, I never said they didn't. > But it's slightly worse in the Republican Party. > You won't find any statistics supporting this, I generally use my own > ears and eyes > instead of some phony Web site or reporters claims. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
