LOL, Keith the Republican party you used as an example no longer exists, the new GOP is the haven for the KKK, Skin Heads, White Supremacists, and the Nazis party.
Also pointing this FACT out does not mean I am intolerant to racist, I am just saying these groups reside within the NEW Republican Party! In regard to Reagan you said he was the most popular president in recent history, I was merely correcting your error, Clinton had a higher final Approval Rating at the end of his term than Reagan did. Again stating facts, rather than erroneous opinion. You should try that once in a while. On May 4, 9:42 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Sugarshack, > > If you heard that "talking point" from three other "talking heads" this > week, then I am quite flattered! That means that whoever you are listening > too, is reading my posts here on PoliticalForum! > > With regard to your "spin"; for you to attempt to pin Nazi's, Skin-Heads > and the KKK on the Republican Party is laughable, when clearly, the only > announced members of the KKK were Democrats and socialists. Once again, > it demonstrates my point about those who claim to be "more tolerant, kinder, > gentler, and more enlightened", are none of the above, and genuinely have an > agenda. If one crosses that agenda or disagrees with it, then the far left > extremist smear machine gears up, and all folks like you can do is start > tossing personal barbs and insults. > > Again, for you to attempt to compare Bill Clinton to Ronald Reagan shows > your naivety, or just plain, outright ignorance. > > But I still enjoy ya!!! > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:53 PM, VT VirtualTruth > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Clinton had higher approval ratings than Reagan at the end of their > > Presidency's so your comment is not true. > > > Also once again you are repeating words and ideas other have spoon fed > > you or you have heard from the talking heads. > > > I heard the exact phase of 3 times in my lifetime the Republican > > party..... > > from 3 different talking heads this week end. Keith please try to be > > original or at least change the words! > > > On May 2, 8:36 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Studio, Studio, Studio, > > > > In my adult life, of which I have been politically active, I have seen > > > predicted, and witnessed folks like you profess the demise of the > > Republican > > > Party at least three times. When I was just able to vote, shortly after > > > the Nixon/Watergate era, (and which was the first and only time I ever > > voted > > > for a Democrat Presidential candidate) folks like you were predicting > > that > > > the demise of the Republican Party was imminent, that it was a "Brand New > > > Day, A Brand New World". After four years of Jimmy Carter, our Nation > > > overwhelmingly elected Ronald Reagan, the greatest American President in > > > yours and my lifetime, (Despite what my most esteemed moderator "The > > > Annointed One" believes!!! LOL!!!) > > > > Then, after "A thousand Points of Light" and the mediocrity of George > > > Herbert Walker Bush and his wife who remarkably resembled George > > Washington, > > > the Nation went into "Clinton-Mania". After two years of "I feel your > > pain" > > > and folks like you once again professing that "The Republican Party > > > Is Toast"; it wasn't two years later, that the Republicans gained > > control > > > of both the Senate and the House, as well as most all State legislatures > > and > > > local elected offices. > > > > I will concede, as I have previously, that the Republicans are a House in > > > disarray right now. That we lost our way, with a number of individuals > > who > > > infiltrated our Party who are not conservatives, and who were for the > > most > > > part, big spending egalitarians who hurt our Nation. > > > > Having said that, what has happened on your side of the aisle, (and Sean > > > "Sugarshack" VT's) is far more sinister. Americans are catching on to > > the > > > whole concept of "Change We Can Believe In", the tea parties were just a > > > taste. > > > > In eighteen months, the House will once again be controlled by thinking > > > Americans. Your socialist party os over my friend! Enjoy it while you > > > can!!! > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:17 PM, studio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On May 2, 2:22 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Studio!! > > > > > > Well, first, if we were going to get into political parties and, > > > > "racism", > > > > > you clearly identified the wrong party. I am unaware of any policy or > > any > > > > > plank of the Republican National Comittee that could even remotely be > > > > > construed as "racist"; albeit I know that a lot of "clueless" > > individuals > > > > > would somehow attempt to frame or promote such platforms as racist. > > > > > First off, the thread was started by Travis, not a political party, > > > > but one in > > > > which he clearly supports calling the President a "Muzzie", which he > > > > is clearly not. > > > > > Second, you must not think your party is very smart not to have > > > > included policy > > > > which would obviously shrink their ranks even further than it is now. > > > > > Third, there is no such stated policy in the Democrat platform > > > > either, > > > > so by your logic, would nullify all that you just stated. > > > > > > What was it you were saying about Republicans being, "racist"? Do > > you > > > > care > > > > > to revise this position Studio?? > > > > > No I don't, they are. > > > > But it's not a stated policy, rather a understated "soft racism" with > > > > a nod and a wink. > > > > Both parties have it, I never said they didn't. > > > > But it's slightly worse in the Republican Party. > > > > You won't find any statistics supporting this, I generally use my own > > > > ears and eyes > > > > instead of some phony Web site or reporters claims. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
