Keith try to develop your own ironic responses, I used the same response to you in another group. Did you really think that using it HERE you would be clever? You are merely unoriginal, and you let me know this stung when I used it against you.
Now would you like to address the second post? On May 3, 7:10 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Sugarshack!!! > > I have missed you!! > > I am a strong supporter of civil unions for homos. It's the oxymoronic > "same sex marriage" concept that I have trouble with. > > How are ya? > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 7:05 PM, VT VirtualTruth > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Oh and by the way, the majority of the country voted INTO office > > those 'secularists far left socialists' otherwise known as moderates > > who govern from practical reality and not impractical ideology of > > people > > like yourself. > > > On May 2, 11:27 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As I said in another thread, I am catching up, its been a busy week. > > > > Hey Rigs!! > > > > I only wish that I had a whole lotta women hangin' out here at the Keith > > In > > > Tampa Hacienda. I would be delighted to put on a little show!! No, > > Renee > > > still comes around, mainly to bitch, gripe, and make me take her out > > > somewhere expensive. She would definitely be quashing/putting the hiatus > > on > > > gals coming over here in the front lawn....It ain't gonna happen I don't > > > think..... > > > > Sugarshack and Holly, > > > > The standard still exists in this Nation, which is that most, the > > majority > > > of Americans, believe that it is wrong by a bunch of secularist far left > > > socialists attempting to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is > > > still to this day, an ecclisiastical function, there is no such thing as > > a > > > "civil marriage" as hard as secularists want to make it so. > > > > Most Americans have no problem with civil unions, in fact, California has > > a > > > civil union law in place now. That was not good enough for folks like > > Perez > > > Hilton, they want to redefine marriage, and they want to shove their > > > lifestyle down our throats, if you disagree, then you are immediately > > > branded a "homophobe". It has nothing whatsoever to do with equal > > rights. > > > NOTHING!!! > > > > My point being, is your "standards" from the mid to late 19th century is > > > misplaced Holly, and Sugarshack, wake up and smell the coffee!!! Put > > down > > > the cocktails, step away from the pharmaceuticals, and no more ganja for > > > you!!! > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, VT VirtualTruth < > > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Let's rewind the tape, The STANDARD is stupidity > > > > and that is the dumb blond and YOU identify with > > > > the dumb blond's ideas. So the TWO of you have the > > > > same STANDARDS, So if attaining the STANDARD is > > > > Nirvana, do you need me to continue connecting the dots, or are you > > > > to stupid to make it to nirvana, Dick? > > > > > On Apr 30, 7:51 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nirvana is when you attained the standard. Since stupidity is the > > > > > standard, you are not being intelligent and I am not being stupid. > > You > > > > > really need to think things through before you respond. > > > > > > VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > And you are merely average, Nirvana meaning in my case > > > > > > being intelligent and in your case, stupid. > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 7:32 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> You must have attained nirvana then. > > > > > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>> Stupidity is a standard we should all be striving for? > > > > > > >>> On Apr 30, 7:25 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> You really are a putz. The US had standards for a long while > > and > > > > this > > > > > >>>> girl reflected those standards well. They served us just fine > > until > > > > the > > > > > >>>> people like Perez Hilton came along. Believe it or not > > California > > > > has > > > > > >>>> been a part of the US for a good long while and a lot of the > > country > > > > > >>>> does agree with the standards Miss California talked about. > > > > > > >>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> California is a country? > > > > > >>>>> That made sense to you? > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 30, 7:02 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>> She sure made a lot of sense to anyone who cares about the > > > > standards the > > > > > >>>>>> country lived by when it was building this nation. She made a > > lot > > > > of > > > > > >>>>>> sense to anyone who stands for their beliefs rather than spin > > in > > > > the > > > > > >>>>>> wind to point whatever direction is the latest fad. Maybe you > > > > just > > > > > >>>>>> failed to understand anyone with standards? > > > > > > >>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>> The fact that the woman made no sense had nothing to do with > > > > > >>>>>>> her losing? So made the dumb blond stereotype seem to be a > > > > reality. > > > > > > >>>>>>> When did the Miss America contest become an important issue? > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/29/finding-her-new-cause/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
