KIT, Bullshit, my point was perfectly clear to anyyone with even average reading comprehension skills.
On May 2, 8:21 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Holly!! > > I actually understood your point, (believe it or not!!!) and don't > necessarily disagree. I just think that you were purposely attempting to > mix a bunch of apples in with the oranges, and we needed to clarify a little > bit!!! > > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > KIT, > > > My point was just because it was ONE of the MANY "standards" of the > > 17th or 18th century it does not AUTOMATICALLY follow that it is STILL > > a good or worthy standard to uphold today. > > > On May 2, 10:27 am, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As I said in another thread, I am catching up, its been a busy week. > > > > Hey Rigs!! > > > > I only wish that I had a whole lotta women hangin' out here at the Keith > > In > > > Tampa Hacienda. I would be delighted to put on a little show!! No, > > Renee > > > still comes around, mainly to bitch, gripe, and make me take her out > > > somewhere expensive. She would definitely be quashing/putting the hiatus > > on > > > gals coming over here in the front lawn....It ain't gonna happen I don't > > > think..... > > > > Sugarshack and Holly, > > > > The standard still exists in this Nation, which is that most, the > > majority > > > of Americans, believe that it is wrong by a bunch of secularist far left > > > socialists attempting to change the definition of marriage. Marriage is > > > still to this day, an ecclisiastical function, there is no such thing as > > a > > > "civil marriage" as hard as secularists want to make it so. > > > > Most Americans have no problem with civil unions, in fact, California has > > a > > > civil union law in place now. That was not good enough for folks like > > Perez > > > Hilton, they want to redefine marriage, and they want to shove their > > > lifestyle down our throats, if you disagree, then you are immediately > > > branded a "homophobe". It has nothing whatsoever to do with equal > > rights. > > > NOTHING!!! > > > > My point being, is your "standards" from the mid to late 19th century is > > > misplaced Holly, and Sugarshack, wake up and smell the coffee!!! Put > > down > > > the cocktails, step away from the pharmaceuticals, and no more ganja for > > > you!!! > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:40 PM, VT VirtualTruth < > > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Let's rewind the tape, The STANDARD is stupidity > > > > and that is the dumb blond and YOU identify with > > > > the dumb blond's ideas. So the TWO of you have the > > > > same STANDARDS, So if attaining the STANDARD is > > > > Nirvana, do you need me to continue connecting the dots, or are you > > > > to stupid to make it to nirvana, Dick? > > > > > On Apr 30, 7:51 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nirvana is when you attained the standard. Since stupidity is the > > > > > standard, you are not being intelligent and I am not being stupid. > > You > > > > > really need to think things through before you respond. > > > > > > VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > And you are merely average, Nirvana meaning in my case > > > > > > being intelligent and in your case, stupid. > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 7:32 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> You must have attained nirvana then. > > > > > > >> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>> Stupidity is a standard we should all be striving for? > > > > > > >>> On Apr 30, 7:25 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>> You really are a putz. The US had standards for a long while > > and > > > > this > > > > > >>>> girl reflected those standards well. They served us just fine > > until > > > > the > > > > > >>>> people like Perez Hilton came along. Believe it or not > > California > > > > has > > > > > >>>> been a part of the US for a good long while and a lot of the > > country > > > > > >>>> does agree with the standards Miss California talked about. > > > > > > >>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> California is a country? > > > > > >>>>> That made sense to you? > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 30, 7:02 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>> She sure made a lot of sense to anyone who cares about the > > > > standards the > > > > > >>>>>> country lived by when it was building this nation. She made a > > lot > > > > of > > > > > >>>>>> sense to anyone who stands for their beliefs rather than spin > > in > > > > the > > > > > >>>>>> wind to point whatever direction is the latest fad. Maybe you > > > > just > > > > > >>>>>> failed to understand anyone with standards? > > > > > > >>>>>> VT VirtualTruth wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>> The fact that the woman made no sense had nothing to do with > > > > > >>>>>>> her losing? So made the dumb blond stereotype seem to be a > > > > reality. > > > > > > >>>>>>> When did the Miss America contest become an important issue? > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 12:15 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/29/finding-her-new-cause...quoted > > > > text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
