Nor was it, at one point, considered discriminatory to be opposed to interracial marriage.
On May 15, 9:18 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey J.C.!! > > (LOL, Here We Go Again!!) > > First, I am not a Biblical scholar, as you are!! Having said that, I note > that you only reference the Old Jewish Testament, and not the New > Covenants, Christians believe Christ released them from the bonds of strict > adherence to the Old Testament Law and superimposed God's judgment with > Grace. For those who read the Old testament and find harshness, this means > the New covenant supersedes anything in the Old Testament. > > Moreover, Jesus Christ told us that the whole law, *e.g.;* the "Old > Testament" could be summarized in two commands: "*Love God with all your > heart, soul and mind*"; and "*Love your neighbor as yourself*" *See* Luke > 12:28-32. > Further, Christ also taught us that, “*B**ecause this is my blood of the > new covenant that is being poured out for many people for the forgiveness of > sins*.” (*See* Matthew 26:28); and. “*For if there had been nothing wrong > with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another*.” * > See* Hebrews 8:7; and, “*By calling this covenant "new," he has made the > first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear*.” * > See* Hebrews 8:13. > > From our messages back in February of this year: > > With purposeful , extensive, methodical propaganda, planning, massive > amounts of funding by the likes of George Soros, Hollywood elitists and > others, and with controlled, extensive media manipulation, it is my opinion > that you, and many Americans have been intentionally misled and mislead. > There has been a concerted effort by a select hard core group of socialists > and secularists, who want to destroy the traditional values of this Nation, > the very core values that made this Nation great. > > By example, there is no other definition of and for marriage, other than the > term's religious connotation. The premise that there is some kind of > "civil definition" of marriage is incorrect. Marriage is in total, an > ecclesiastical function; marriage always has been and continues to be. If > one studies the history of marriage in this Nation, the several States got > involved in the contract of "Marriage", only because of the conflict of > varying religious tenets, and in part, to regulate miscegenation back in the > early to mid nineteenth century. As stated, marriage is now, and has always > been between a man and a woman, and this is at the very core of traditional > values in western civilization. The definition of marriage extends > throughout recorded history of western civilization. > > The term, "same sex marriage" is an oxymoron, there can be no such thing, > without literally changing the definition of marriage. That is the goal of > these socialists and secularists; e.g.; to redefine the definition of > marriage. This would be the equivalent of changing the definition of > "Murder", or "giraffe"; or any other noun, adjective or adverb. > > Despite the concept that many individuals and entities are trying to sell > the American public, (including Mags, and this Moonbat "ThosPayne) in his > article that Mags posted captioned: "When Same-Sex Marriage Was a Christian > Rite") most of which are from socialist-elitist movements here in the > United States, and in this particular case, e.g.; the push for "gay > marriage"; it is the militant gay movements within the United States, that > has, and attempts to portray any individual that is opposed to gay marriage > as somehow being bigoted, and equivalent to being racist, comparing > themselves to the black community and the black leadership that pushed for > racial equality who were treated unjustly during the mid to late 20th > century. > > It is not discriminatory for Americans to be opposed to, and rejecting same > sex marriages as being a part of normal, mainstream behavior > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:58 PM, J.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Oh, are we back to the biblical definition of marriage? Would that be > > Abraham taking his handmaiden? Jacob and his two wives? Lot's > > daughters getting him drunk and sleeping with him? David having the > > husband of the woman he wanted killed? All the other plural marriages > > and concubines that show up? Or are we talking about the property > > aspect of it? > > > Come on, Baby...you can do better than that. > > > On May 15, 8:35 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The term, "Gay Marriage" or "Same Sex Marriage" is an oxymoron, but we > > have > > > been down this road before J.C.!!! > > > > (LOL!!) > > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM, J.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You can look, but don't touch. > > > > > On May 15, 8:20 pm, SgtUSMC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well, I'm sure she practices abstinence, at least. > > > > > > On May 15, 9:53 pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Ms. Rambo? I don't think so. She is nothing more than a hypocrite > > of > > > > > > the highest order. It is alright for her to pose semi-nude and to > > > > > > prance around in a bikini while her chosen party tells all the > > other > > > > > > girls how modest they should be, just as long as she espouses their > > > > > > views on gay marriage. She is nothing more than a pretty little > > > > > > convenience - and more likely than not with implants. > > > > > > > On May 15, 7:02 pm, "d.b.baker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 15, 8:25 pm, "J.C." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You're kidding, right? No one forced her to be in the Miss > > America > > > > > > > > pageant, or forced her to pose semi-nude, or forced her to do > > > > > > > > anything... > > > > > > > > Yes they did do something; they tried to force her "out." > > > > > > > > Fools, they thought they were setting up a bimbo, but instead > > they > > > > got > > > > > > > Ms. Rambo. > > > > > > > > And we can still hear those raging queens screaming. - Hide > > quoted > > > > text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
