jgg,

Guess that's something courts will have to figure out.
Wait a minute here, you've gone from "demand" to "want" already? No
laws, or proposed laws I know that would make it illegal to "hurt
someone's feelings".

On May 16, 10:19 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> What about the grey areas as "Obama is a Nigger"???  which contain NO
> bodily threats and cause merely hurt feelings???  Many want to make
> these "hate speech"...  Yet your 1st example did just that FOR SOME
> FOLKS...  If one argues "Rule of Law" the ANY speech that hurts anyone
> should be treated as equal (i.e. no special protected classes or
> minorities)...   One problem with the proposed hate laws to date is
> that "hurt feelings" of only some groups is considered as justifying a
> specific speech as "hate speech"...
>
> Second under current law speech without action is not a crime (with
> limited exceptions - yelling Fire in a crowded theater (as many
> politicians do) or slander damaging reputation)...   Are we to
> overthrow that standard to shield bigots who shout "all whites are
> racist bigots"" who happen to be AA???  But to imprison a white bigot
> for the same???
>
> Was not the actions of the Duke professors organized "hate speech"
> deliberately aimed to defame innocent Duke Lacrosse players???
> Should not they be inprisioned for their KKK like actions???
>
> But to include all offender would make a hate speech law
> impassable...  Why???  The purpose of laws in fundamentally impose a
> speech code on only selected portions of citizens in the end...  If
> Liberal bigotry and hate speech fell under the same law Liberals would
> vigorously oppose it...   Just think of how many Liberals would be
> charged with hate crimes today for their remarks about Miss
> California...   Or the comic at the WH who told a joke(non joke?)
> about wishing Rush dead)....
>
> On May 15, 6:55 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > jjg,
>
> > Please explain to me the positives of hate speech, how the world might
> > be worse if it were to be banned.
>
> > Please do not confuse hate speech with exercising the Constituion
> > right of freedom of speech.
>
> > Not a damn thing wrong to say "I despise George Bush/Barrack Obama
> > (whoeverthefuck)i urge all my fellow citizens to votes against him and
> > oppose his policies at every opportunity." Freedom of speech.
>
> > "I despise George Bush/Barrack Obama (whoeverthefuck) and urge you to
> > KILL the S.O.B. and the traitors that voted for him". Hate speech.
>
> > On May 15, 3:12 pm, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > I can say the same about hateful speech...  Yet many Liberal demand an
> > > absolute ban...
>
> > > On May 15, 12:50 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > jgg,
>
> > > > Look at it this way. There can be absilutely no question that firearms
> > > > are frequently used in immoral ways.
> > > > Shall we remove the right to own and carry firearms in an attempt to
> > > > stop this immoral behaviour?
>
> > > > On May 15, 11:17 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > This is a question that folks favoring abortion must face...  What
> > > > > reason are "moral" for deciding to have an abortion???   If any reason
> > > > > will do, then clearly one sees a fetus as a life "without
> > > > > rights"....   When do human right start and/or stop???  But morality
> > > > > is a tangled web of contrary rhymes and reasoning...
>
> > > > > In Sweden, it is state approval was given to abort a female fetus...
> > > > > Should or Could the State make such decisions???   Is this what is
> > > > > meant by "State Religion"???
>
> > > > >http://hotair.com/archives/2009/05/13/sweden-approves-gender-based-ab...
>
> > > > > >> Swedish women will be permitted to abort their children based on 
> > > > > >> the sex of the fetus, according to a ruling by Sweden’s National 
> > > > > >> Board of Health and Welfare.
>
> > > > > The ruling was spurred by a request from Kai Wedenberg, head of the
> > > > > clinic where a woman twice requested, and received, an abortion based
> > > > > on sex.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to