Well said Lew, and good to see ya over here in this neck of the woods!!
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM, lewcoop <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The Dems will discover that from 2001-2008, the U.S. had a president > who put the lives and rights and dignity of innocent Americans AHEAD > of Killer/Terrorists who would kill and maim innocent Americans. > > What nobler action is there for a United States President than to > protect and defend the people of the nation who selected him to do > just that. > > On May 18, 12:27�pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > Zeb, > > > > Yeah, and I agreed that Nixon was never impeached. So what are you > > whining about now? > > > > On May 18, 11:08�am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Like I said and VT was deluded about, Nixon was never impeached. > > > Unlike another President who perjured himself to a federal judge and > > > encouraged perjury in others, thereby disgracing himself and his > > > office, not to mention breaking federal law, Nixon resigned rather > > > than torture the country. > > > > > On May 18, 11:15�am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > Nope, he resigned in disgrace before he could be impeached. > > > > > > On May 18, 10:08�am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > What school did you go to? Nixon was never impeached. Delusions > become > > > > > reality for libs. > > > > > > > On May 17, 3:26�am, VT VirtualTruth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > If we tried the little guys for what happened at Abu Gharib > > > > > > then the precedent has already been set for the ENTIRE > > > > > > Bush Administration. > > > > > > > > I believe Nixon was also Impeached for his crimes > > > > > > during the Vietnam war. > > > > > > > > Nixon resigned rather than face impeachment for his crimes > > > > > > while in office, and Republicans pushed all out to �impeach > > > > > > Clinton while in office about a lie over a BJ. > > > > > > > > So both your reasons for calling me a traitor have both been > > > > > > proven false based on previous precedent. > > > > > > > > You have nothing left to say, because you have run > > > > > > out of realistic arguments. > > > > > > > > On May 16, 4:47�pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Sean!! > > > > > > > > > Actually, I thought my post was rather witty!! > > > > > > > > > In all honesty, you seem like a bright, intelligent, (I am > assuming younger > > > > > > > than me) man. � It is one thing to question our governments' > policies, and > > > > > > > quite another to jump on a traitorous bandwagon, accusing our > President, > > > > > > > (any President!) during a time of war, of war crimes. > > > > > > > > > I have nothing else to say on the subject. �Based on all of the > information > > > > > > > that has been released to date, I don't believe that we ever > "tortured" > > > > > > > anyone. �That this is just a hyped up term used by far left > extremists who > > > > > > > are either uninformed, and/or have an Anti-American agenda. > �One or the > > > > > > > other.... > > > > > > > > > Until such time as more information has been released, (which > initially I > > > > > > > was opposed to, but now, because the Obama Administration chose > to release > > > > > > > the several Memoranda by Bybee and Bradbury) I want to see > everything > > > > > > > released, including the documents from July 2004 that former > Vice President > > > > > > > Cheney has requested be released. > > > > > > > > > Until such time, I can add nothing to the conversation.....I've > said my > > > > > > > piece, both here in PF, as well as that Den of Moonbats, > Euwetopia. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:43 PM, VT VirtualTruth > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > That was the best you could do? > > > > > > > > > > Keith you want to try again? > > > > > > > > > > On May 16, 1:38 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:53 PM, VT Sean Lewis > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The shifting denial about torture. > > > > > > > > > > > > May 16, 2009 > > > > > > > > > > Sean Lewis > > > > > > > > > > > > Torture is just one more nail into the coffin > > > > > > > > > > for the Republican Party. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheney is just trying to protect himself and > > > > > > > > > > doing preemptive damage control. It is clear > > > > > > > > > > the torture policy was his decision. Cheney > > > > > > > > > > is hoping for another terror attack so he can > > > > > > > > > > be vindicated the same way the entire GOP > > > > > > > > > > party wants President Obama to fail so the > > > > > > > > > > GOP policies can be vindicated. > > > > > > > > > > > > The water down spin on torture is that water > > > > > > > > > > boarding is not torture. Dunking someones > > > > > > > > > > head is hardly torture, it is like getting baptised! > > > > > > > > > > The rough questioning was needed to get results! > > > > > > > > > > > > However a few things are being left out, 98 > > > > > > > > > > dead prisoners, the torture did not work, and > > > > > > > > > > torture is against the both US and International > > > > > > > > > > law. > > > > > > > > > > > > If all the CIA was doing was 'questioning' prisoners > > > > > > > > > > why was a doctor needed to be present? > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been questioned by the police, no doctor was > present. > > > > > > > > > > > > In previous questioning by the FBI, no doctor was > present, > > > > > > > > > > so what changed? > > > > > > > > > > > > What changed was there was now a chance that the prisoner > > > > > > > > > > might die from the harsh interrogation. In fact 98 > prisoners > > > > > > > > > > who were being held for 'questioning died. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://opendebateforum2.blogspot.com/2009/04/98-prisoners-died-in-us-. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > This article had 623 footnotes verifying the deaths. > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.humanrightsfirst.info/pdf/06221-etn-hrf-dic-rep-web.pdf > > > > > > > > > > I posted one of those footnotes at the end of this > article. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Torture Apologists want you to believe that water > boarding > > > > > > > > > > is not dangerous, problem is water boarding wasn't the > only > > > > > > > > > > harsh treatment the prisoners received. A point the > Torture Apologist > > > > > > > > > > conveniently do not bring up. Also if it wasn't torture > > > > > > > > > > explain the 98 dead prisoners? > > > > > > > > > > > > Next comes the issue of why the prisoners were being > tortured > > > > > > > > > > and what were the results of the torture. > > > > > > > > > > > > We were told that the torture was to protect Americans > from future > > > > > > > > > > attack, and that valuable information came as a result of > the torture. > > > > > > > > > > This was after we were told that the US does not torture > by the way. > > > > > > > > > > > > The truth is that the CIA was torturing prisoners. not to > protect > > > > > > > > > > America or Americans, but to find a connection between > Iraq and > > > > > > > > > > 9/11 or a connection between Iraq and Al qaeda. This was > to > > > > > > > > > > give cover to the Bush Administration after no WMD's were > found > > > > > > > > > > in Iraq. > > > > > > > > > > > > The torture how ever did not work, In fact it had the > opposite effect. > > > > > > > > > > Prisoners who were cooperating and freely giving valuable > Intel about > > > > > > > > > > Al qaeda without torture to the FBI, stopped cooperation > when the > > > > > > > > > > CIA began torturing them about non existent connections > between > > > > > > > > > > Iraq and 9/11 or Iraq and Al Qaeda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://opendebateforum2.blogspot.com/2009/05/timeline-history-of-hars. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://opendebateforum2.blogspot.com/2009/05/report-links-cia-to-mili. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://opendebateforum2.blogspot.com/2009/05/harsh-interrogation-tech. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > The legality of torture is, there is none. The Bush > Administration > > > > > > > > > > knew > > > > > > > > > > this so in an effort to do a work around, the Bush > Administration > > > > > > > > > > redefined the status of the prisoners to a classification > the Bush > > > > > > > > > > Administration > > > > > > > > > > deemed outside of the Geneva Convention. > > > > > > > > > > > > Next came the justification of 'Harsh Interrogation' > because of the > > > > > > > > > > 'ticking > > > > > > > > > > time bomb' scenario. The White House ordered White House > attorneys to > > > > > > > > > > write briefs not only saying that harsh interrogation was > not torture, > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > instances when harsh interrogation was prudent and > advised. > > > > > > > > > > > > Two problems with this, the need for a doctor during > 'questioning' and > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > 98 dead prisoners, also the questioning of the prisoners > had nothing > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > do with an imminent threat that was time sensitive. It > was about > > > > > > > > > > getting > > > > > > > > > > back fill Intel to justify the Iraq invasion. > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently the Torture Apologists are trying to say that > key democratic > > > > > > > > > > leaders > > > > > > > > > > were also culpable in the torture. The belief is, if > everyone is > > > > > > > > > > guilty then > > > > > > > > > > no one is guilty. The Torture Apologists are floating out > the Pelosi > > > > > > > > > > knew > > > > > > > > > > so it;s her fault the torture occurred. > > > > > > > > > > > > The CIA said that the Leaders of the Democratic and > Republican Parties > > > > > > > > > > were > > > > > > > > > > briefed about the torture already being used against > prisoners. When > > > > > > > > > > asked > > > > > > > > > > for the dates of the briefings, the CIA gave four dates > two in April > > > > > > > > > > of '02, > > > > > > > > > > two in September." When these dates were checked, it was > discovered > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > three of these meetings never occurred. The fourth > meeting was on the > > > > > > > > > > topic > > > > > > > > > > of prisoner interrogation. The CIA says they INFORMED the > Leaders of > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > torture, even though it was already occurring without > Congressional > > > > > > > > > > Approval > > > > > > > > > > or Knowledge for a month or more. �The Congressional > Leaders disagree > > > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > these facts and based on the erroneous dates already > supplied, one has > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > wonder what else the CIA has wrong? > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://opendebateforum2.blogspot.com/2009/05/floridas-graham-backs-pe. > > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > So the Torture Apologists have shifted reasons for > Torture each time > > > > > > > > > > their > > > > ... > > > > read more �- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
