What happen to Change??


On Jun 12, 6:27 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: *Travis*
> Date: Fri, Jun 12, 2009
> Subject:  Obama Lies
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/11/AR200...
>
> *Obama Hovers From on High
> *
>
> By Charles Krauthammer
> Friday, June 12, 2009
>
> *"And the Spirit of God hovered upon the face of the waters"*
>
> -- *Genesis 1:2*
>
>  When President Obama returned from his first European trip, I
> observed<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/09/AR200...>that
> while over there he had been "acting the philosopher-king who hovers
> above the fray mediating" between America and the world. Now that Obama has
> returned from his "Muslim world" pilgrimage, even the left agrees. "Obama's
> standing above the country, above -- above the world. He's sort of God,"
> Newsweek's Evan Thomas
> said<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/06/05/newsweek_editor_eva...>to
> a concurring Chris Matthews, reflecting on Obama's lofty perception of
> himself as the great transcender.
>
> Not that Obama considers himself divine. (He sees himself as merely
> messianic, or, at worst, apostolic.) But he does position himself as
> hovering above mere mortals, mere country, to gaze benignly upon the
> darkling plain beneath him where ignorant armies clash by night, blind to
> the common humanity that only he can see. Traveling the world, he brings the
> gospel of understanding and godly forbearance. We have all sinned against
> each other. We must now look beyond that and walk together to the sunny
> uplands of comity and understanding. He shall guide you. Thus:
>
> (A) He told Iran that, on the one hand, America once helped overthrow an
> Iranian government, while on the other hand "Iran has played a role in acts
> of hostage-taking and violence against U.S. troops and civilians." (Played a
> role?!) We have both sinned; let us bury the past and begin anew.
>
> (B) On religious tolerance, he gently referenced the Christians of Lebanon
> and Egypt, then lamented that the "divisions between Sunni and Shia have led
> to tragic violence" (note the use of the passive voice). He then criticized
> (in the active voice) Western religious intolerance for regulating the
> wearing of the hijab -- after citing America for making it difficult for
> Muslims to give to charity.
>
> (C) Obama offered Muslims a careful admonition about women's rights, noting
> how denying women education impoverishes a country -- balanced, of course,
> with this: "Issues of women's equality are by no means simply an issue for
> Islam." Example? "The struggle for women's equality continues in many
> aspects of American life."
>
> Well, yes. On the one hand, there certainly is some American university
> where the women's softball team has received insufficient Title IX funds --
> while, on the other hand, Saudi women showing ankle are beaten in the
> street, Afghan school girls have acid thrown in their faces, and Iranian
> women are publicly stoned to death for adultery. (Gays, as well -- but then
> again we have Prop 8.) We all have our shortcomings, our national foibles.
> Who's to judge?
>
> That's the problem with Obama's transcultural evenhandedness. It gives the
> veneer of professorial sophistication to the most simple-minded observation:
> Of course there are rights and wrongs in all human affairs. Our species is a
> fallen one. But that doesn't mean that these rights and wrongs are of equal
> weight.
>
> A CIA rent-a-mob in a coup 56 years ago does not balance the
> hostage-takings, throat-slittings, terror bombings and wanton slaughters
> perpetrated for 30 years by a thug regime in Tehran (and its surrogates)
> that our own State Department
> calls<http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2008/122436.htm>the world's
> "most active state sponsor of terrorism."
>
> True, France prohibits the wearing of the hijab in certain public places, in
> part to allow the force of law to protect Muslim women who might be coerced
> into wearing it by neighborhood fundamentalist gangs. But it borders on the
> obscene to compare this mild preference for secularization (seen in Muslim
> Turkey as well) to the violence that has been visited upon Copts, Maronites,
> Bahais, Druze and other minorities in Muslim lands, and to the unspeakable
> cruelties perpetrated by Shiites and Sunnis upon each other.
>
> Even on freedom of religion, Obama could not resist the compulsion to find
> fault with his own country: "For instance, in the United States, rules on
> charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious
> obligation" -- disgracefully giving the impression to a foreign audience not
> versed in our laws that there is active discrimination against Muslims, when
> the only restriction, applied to all donors regardless of religion, is on
> funding charities that serve as fronts for terror.
>
> For all of his philosophy, the philosopher-king protests too much. Obama
> undoubtedly thinks he is demonstrating historical magnanimity with all these
> moral equivalencies and self-flagellating apologetics. On the contrary. He's
> showing cheap condescension, an unseemly hunger for applause and a
> willingness to distort history for political effect.
>
> Distorting history is not truth-telling but the telling of soft lies.
> Creating false equivalencies is not moral leadership but moral abdication.
> And hovering above it all, above country and history, is a sign not of
> transcendence but of a disturbing ambivalence toward one's own country.
>
>  If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we
> are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the
> intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
> … We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to
> tolerate the intolerant.  –Sir Karl Popper
>   <[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> __,_._,___
>
> --
> *~@):~{>
>
> --
> *~@):~{>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to