Geez Dick?? What news channel, or what web site, or what radio station are you listening too?
Who is it that you perceive is wanting to intervene? The Hutsis and the Tutus? How is that in any way, shape form or fashion even remotely resembling what is going on in Iran? And you believe that our "intervention" is what caused the attacks on September 11th? Our intervention in what? Our intervention of whom? Are you at all familiar with the tenets of Islam? On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:59 PM, RICHARD BROWN < [email protected]> wrote: > > Why bother with Iran having a bogus election? We didn't interfere > with other nations that did that. Heck we didn't even interfere with > Hutu genocide of Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994 that claimed the lives of > about 800,000 people. Why are we so eager to intervene? Because we > know best, right? > Intervention is one of the main reasons we were attacked on 9-11. > When will we ever learn? Probably never...we love to play parent to > others in our lives and we expect our leaders to do the same with > other nations. > I think I will start the Paternal Party. I could probably get most of > the folks in this nation to join. > Dik > > On Jun 20, 5:52 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes Keith, > > > > Point well taken ! > > > > > *************************************************************************8 > > > > On Jun 20, 8:11 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Sage, > > > > > My only concern, is the potential for harm and death for those who are > > > standing in the streets fighting those tyrannous Mullahs/thugs who > stand > > > behind a purported "Religion Of Peace", and what it is that they are > > > obviously doing to their own citizenry. I fear that an outcry of > support > > > from our government, without committing to use force, (whcih we will > not do, > > > and rightfully so) will only cause more of those who are out there > fighting > > > these Mullahs to lose their lives. > > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Keith, > > > > Lets not forget this is the same regime that supports > > > > Hamas, Hezbolla and countless other terrorist puppets and works > behind > > > > the scenes to dump on the USA. Why should Obama back off ? They > don't! > > > > The little monkey came here on our own soil and spewed hate and > hurled > > > > insults @ our president. So why are we supposed to show restraint to > a > > > > medieval age Ayhatolla. Where is their restraint in the streets of > > > > Tehran? Obama should be more forcefull in his words. > > > > > > > *************************************************************************** > ************************************************************************** > ************************************************************************** > ***************** > > > > > > On Jun 20, 3:55 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hey Sage, > > > > > > > I agree that our President is clearly not experienced nor is he an > astute > > > > > diplomat. Having said that, Washington is truly in a situation > where we > > > > > can't say much. To offer too much encouragement will look as if > we are > > > > > supporting such demonstrations, and there is no chance in Hell that > we > > > > are > > > > > going to go in and support these people, other than some chin > music. > > > > > > > This same scenario was played out in the Soviet satellite > Nation-States > > > > > thirty years ago, (Poland) forty, and fifty years ago, (East > Germany, > > > > > Hungary and Poland) and the United States was blamed for inciting > the > > > > > protests and not coming to the aid of the demonstrators aftere > > > > encouraging > > > > > their actions before the Soviets. I don't know what the Obama > > > > > Administration could say or do, other than what has already been > offered. > > > > > > > D.B., > > > > > > > I hadn't thought about the Iranian Mullahs contemplating an attack > on > > > > > Israel. The train of thought makes some sense, depending on how > bad the > > > > > internal situation gets. > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Sage2 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I know that " coming out of the shadows " often refers > to > > > > > > Illegal Immigration but today it refers to the messiah Obama. He > came > > > > > > out with a more stringent statement minutes ago on the situation > in > > > > > > Iran. He had too because the developments were acting against his > > > > > > ignorant agenda with Admehdinejad and their face to face talks. > Even > > > > > > congress knew that they have to support the demonstrators for > > > > > > democracy. But for the great OBA it is just a political game. > He's > > > > > > got alot of catching up to do !- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
