bruce, Wouldn't bet on that if I were you.
On Jun 20, 8:33 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > I suspect you will be crying soon enough. > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Hollywood <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > bruce, > > > Boo-fucking-hoo. > > > On Jun 20, 8:05 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For those of us without low impulse control it would be easier just to > > have > > > you subhumans committed, so we could still be free. We don't need > > fascism > > > just because you urinate in public flower boxes. > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Hollywood <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > bruce, > > > > > Hey, the "sin-taxes" are fucking great. I was even able to quit > > > > smoking as I was not about the pay that much for the cigarettes I used > > > > to smoke. Best thing that ever happened. I think he should raise the > > > > taxes again, I save about $150.00 a month bt not smoking. > > > > > On Jun 19, 8:57 am, bruce majors <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The ones your master is imposing even though he said he would not > > raise > > > > > taxes on 95% of the voters? > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Hollywood < > > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > > Syntax? Ain't that them thar' heavy taxes on booze and smokes? > > > > > > > On Jun 19, 8:18 am, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > You should take a course on understanding syntax, Holly. You > > clearly > > > > > > > do not. > > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 10:39 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > KIT, > > > > > > > > > STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil > > > > cililization"???? > > > > > > > > Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just > > assume > > > > > > > > that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" > > without > > > > > > > > being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > > > > > > > > Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see > > how > > > > they > > > > > > > > could be much of a threat to anyone. > > > > > > > > > AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > > > > > > > > On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > > > > > > > > > ================ > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > > > > > > > > > by Ann Coulter > > > > > > > > > Posted 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > > > > > Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > > > > > > > > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > > > > > > > > > Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, > > > > Central > > > > > > Park > > > > > > > > > rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, > > > > welfare > > > > > > > > > recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, > > > > > > strippers or > > > > > > > > > common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the > > enemies > > > > of > > > > > > > > > civilization against civilization. > > > > > > > > > > In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is > > a > > > > > > shocking > > > > > > > > > miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are > > > > shocking > > > > > > > > > miscarriages of justice. > > > > > > > > > > Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a > > shocking > > > > > > > > > miscarriage of justice being carried out against a > > > > "high-spirited" > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > > girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, > > Italy. > > > > > > > > > > Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the > > case > > > > as > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet > > every > > > > > > American > > > > > > > > > news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for > > the > > > > > > accused. > > > > > > > > > > Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and > > > > another > > > > > > man, > > > > > > > > > Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, > > Meredith > > > > > > Kercher, on > > > > > > > > > Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two > > other > > > > > > girls in > > > > > > > > > Perugia. > > > > > > > > > > Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" > > who > > > > > > calls > > > > > > > > > Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does > > not > > > > > > mention that > > > > > > > > > the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence > > > > > > Project," whose > > > > > > > > > investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is > > being > > > > > > railroaded. > > > > > > > > > > Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by > > Egan > > > > -- > > > > > > is that > > > > > > > > > the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, > > > > acted > > > > > > alone. > > > > > > > > > > Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his > > theory is > > > > > > > > > contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a > > > > leading > > > > > > forensic > > > > > > > > > geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's > > massive > > > > > > injuries > > > > > > > > > could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > > > > > > > > > It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, > > released > > > > in > > > > > > January, > > > > > > > > > explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox > > and > > > > > > Sollecito on > > > > > > > > > bail. > > > > > > > > > > Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse > > Ciolino's > > > > > > > > > preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know > > > > every > > > > > > piece of > > > > > > > > > data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > > > > > > > > > Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside > > > > > > investigator" to > > > > > > > > > look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS > > "outside > > > > > > > > > investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd > > if > > > > he > > > > > > didn't > > > > > > > > > mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > > > > > > > > > Why yes there was! > > > > > > > > > > The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce > > judgment, > > > > but > > > > > > he did > > > > > > > > > cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > > > > > > > > > -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators > > to > > > > have > > > > > > caused > > > > > > > > > at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's > > > > house. > > > > > > Despite > > > > > > > > > having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on > > the > > > > handle > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > > > > > > > > > -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches > > > > Sollecito's. > > > > > > The floor > > > > > > > > > had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the > > naked > > > > > > eye, but > > > > > > > > > was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > > > > > > > > > -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were > > > > found > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to > > make > > > > it > > > > > > look like > > > > > > > > > there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately > > by > > > > > > > > > investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but > > were > > > > > > discovered > > > > > > > > > with Luminol. > > > > > > > > > > -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had > > > > abundant > > > > > > amounts > > > > > > > > > of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > > > > > > > > > Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it > > > > exists. > > > > > > > > > > Delusionally, he writes: > > > > > > > > > > "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > > > > > > > > > blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from > > them > > > > on > > > > > > the body? > > > > > > > > > A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died > > > > after a > > > > > > brutal > > > > > > > > > strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife > > > > pokes in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > neck." > > > > > > > > > > Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > > > > > > > > > Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with > > > > Sollecito's > > > > > > DNA, butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp > > nearly > > > > six > > > > > > weeks > > > > > > > > > > after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of > > > > evidence > > > > > > from a > > > > > > > > > contaminated crime scene." > > > > > > > > > > Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time > > that > > > > > > passed > > > > > > > > > before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found > > during > > > > the > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- > > and > > > > > > then was > > > > > > > > > collected for testing during the second search of the sealed > > > > crime > > > > > > scene > > > > > > > > > some weeks later. > > > > > > > > > > True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by > > > > throwing > > > > > > out the > > > > > > > > > old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic > > > > > > contamination > > > > > > > > > of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much > > like > > > > "but > > > > > > he hit > > > > > > > > > me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the > > "real > > > > > > killer.") > > > > > > > > > > Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with > > Knox's > > > > DNA on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife > > > > contained > > > > > > only "a > > > > > > > > > tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I > > know > > > > I'm > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
