You should take a course on understanding syntax, Holly. You clearly do not.
On Jun 18, 10:39 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > KIT, > > STRIPPERS are "enemies of civilization against civil cililization"???? > Isn't that a bit redundant? Maybe it's just me, but i'd just assume > that an "enemy of civilization" was "against civilization" without > being told. Duuuuuuh.... > > Aren't Jim Jones and his followers dead and buried? Don't see how they > could be much of a threat to anyone. > > AC seem to be pretty much an idiot. > > On Jun 17, 10:13 pm, Keith In Tampa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Another good article from CW....I mean Ann Coulter: > > > ================ > > ** > > ** > > ** > > *NYT: Duke Lacrosse Players Killed Meredith Kercher* > > by Ann Coulter > > Posted 06/17/2009 ET > > Updated 06/17/2009 ET > > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32351 > > > Whether it is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Weather Underground, Central Park > > rapists, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Jim Jones and the People's Temple, welfare > > recipients, Palestinian terrorists, murderers, abortionists, strippers or > > common criminals -- liberals always take the side of the enemies of > > civilization against civilization. > > > In the view of The New York *Times*, every criminal trial is a shocking > > miscarriage of justice -- except the ones that actually are shocking > > miscarriages of justice. > > > Thus, in last week's *Times*, Timothy Egan wrote about a shocking > > miscarriage of justice being carried out against a "high-spirited" American > > girl accused of murder by a crazed prosecutor in Perugia, Italy. > > > Egan's column bears as much relationship to the facts of the case as -- > > well, I guess as anything printed in the *Times*. And yet every American > > news network has embraced Egan's version and is flacking for the accused. > > > Amanda Knox, her erstwhile boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, and another man, > > Rudy Guede, stand accused of murdering Knox's roommate, Meredith Kercher, on > > Nov. 1, 2007, at the house Knox and Kercher shared with two other girls in > > Perugia. > > > Egan triumphantly cites an "outside expert hired by CBS News" who calls > > Knox's prosecution, "the railroad job from hell." Egan does not mention that > > the "outside investigator" is Paul Ciolino of the "Innocence Project," whose > > investigations always seem to conclude that the accused is being railroaded. > > > Ciolino's theory of the crime -- adopted unquestioningly by Egan -- is that > > the third man, Guede, who has already confessed to the crime, acted alone. > > > Despite Ciolino's careful analysis of the evidence, his theory is > > contradicted by Guede himself, as well as the coroner and a leading forensic > > geneticist, both of whom have testified that Kercher's massive injuries > > could only have been inflicted by multiple assailants. > > > It is also contradicted by the court's 106-page report, released in January, > > explaining the judge's reasons for refusing to release Knox and Sollecito on > > bail. > > > Even the "48 Hours" executive producer doesn't endorse Ciolino's > > preposterous "single knifeman" theory, admitting: "Do we know every piece of > > data? No. Is there some troubling DNA? Yes." > > > Hey, does anyone know if CBS hired more than one "outside investigator" to > > look at the Knox case? Because if Egan considers one CBS "outside > > investigator" the Rosetta Stone of this case, it would be odd if he didn't > > mention the conclusions of another CBS outside investigator. > > > Why yes there was! > > > The second investigator, Paolo Sfriso, didn't pronounce judgment, but he did > > cite some of the evidence. The evidence includes: > > > -- a large kitchen knife, believed by forensic investigators to have caused > > at least one of Kercher's three wounds, found at Sollecito's house. Despite > > having been thoroughly washed, the knife had Knox's DNA on the handle and > > the murder victim's DNA on the blade. > > > -- a bloody footprint at the crime scene that matches Sollecito's. The floor > > had been cleaned so that the footprint was invisible to the naked eye, but > > was revealed with Luminol (just like on "CSI"). > > > -- Knox's bloody footprints, mixed with Kercher's blood, were found in > > another roommate's room, where a window had been broken to make it look like > > there had been a break-in -- a theory discounted immediately by > > investigators. Knox's footprints, too, had been scrubbed but were discovered > > with Luminol. > > > -- Kercher's bloody bra strap at the crime scene that had abundant amounts > > of Sollecito's DNA on it. > > > Egan explains away the devastating DNA evidence by denying it exists. > > > Delusionally, he writes: > > > "(I)f Knox and Sollecito had killed Kercher, and were in that > > blood-splattered room, why is there no physical trace from them on the body? > > A print? A swap of DNA somewhere? After all, Kercher had died after a brutal > > strangulation, evidence of considerable struggle, with knife pokes in the > > neck." > > > Read the trial transcript, Matlock. > > > Egan does acknowledge the bloody bra strap covered with Sollecito's DNA, > > butdismissively writes: "(T)hey discovered Kercher's clasp nearly six weeks > > > after the murder -- a highly suspect and tainted piece of evidence from a > > contaminated crime scene." > > > Even the defense isn't complaining about the amount of time that passed > > before the bra strap was tested. The bra strap was found during the initial > > search of the crime scene -- which was promptly sealed off -- and then was > > collected for testing during the second search of the sealed crime scene > > some weeks later. > > > True, the defense has tried to minimize all the evidence by throwing out the > > old "contamination" chestnut, but without proof of systematic contamination > > of the evidence, this is just a boilerplate defense, much like "but he hit > > me first." (Next the defense will be vowing to look for the "real killer.") > > > Egan also dismissed the knife at Sollecito's house with Knox's DNA on the > > handle and Kercher's DNA on the blade, claiming the knife contained only "a > > tiny amount of DNA that might match that of the victim." (I know I'm > > constantly finding small amounts of other people's DNA on the blades of my > > kitchen knives.) > > > When the defense tried the "small amount of DNA" argument at trial, forensic > > biologist Patrizia Stefanoni replied, "If the blood evidence is a positive > > match, it is not always important how much there is -- and the material on > > the blade matches the victim." > > > Even the accused murderess has a better theory to explain the DNA on the > > knife. Knox wrote in her prison diary: "I think it is possible Raffaele went > > to Meredith's house, raped her, then killed her and then when he got home, > > while I was sleeping, he pressed my fingerprints on the knife." > > > These are only a few examples of the wildly deceptive account of the Amanda > > Knox trial printed in the *Times*. The reason this is important is that this > > is how the *Times* portrays all criminal prosecutions: Ruthless prosecutor > > railroads innocent bystanders for mysterious reasons. (Unless the victim is > > a late-term abortionist or the accused is a Duke lacrosse player.) > > > The only difference in the Knox case, compared to run-of-the-mill criminal > > cases, is that the copious foreign reporting on the case makes it child's > > play to see how egregiously the *Times* is lying this time. > > > I don't know if Knox murdered her roommate, but I am sure that America's > > news coverage of this case is a crime. > > > AnnLookin'Tight!.jpg > > 66KViewDownload --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
